The effect of height of lifting on dynamic postural control in low back pain patients and healthy subjects.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Majid Shahbazi, Javad Sarrafzadeh, Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani, Hossein Negahban
{"title":"The effect of height of lifting on dynamic postural control in low back pain patients and healthy subjects.","authors":"Majid Shahbazi, Javad Sarrafzadeh, Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani, Hossein Negahban","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2024.12768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study investigated the influence of starting load position during lifting on postural control in nonspecific chronic low back pain (LBP) and healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study included 20 healthy males (mean age: 31.8±7.4 years; range, 18 to 55 years) and 52 male patients (mean age: 33.4±9.2 years; range, 18 to 55 years) with chronic LBP between February 2016 and April 2018. Postural control characteristics were assessed by a force plate system. Center of pressure signals were obtained at a frequency of 100 Hz, and the mean of three trials was calculated. The participants were told to place their feet hip-width apart on the force plate while standing barefoot. They were then asked to lift a box weighing 10% of their body weight from the ground to waist height and then from waist height to overhead with straight elbows. They moved the box at their selected speed. The examinations began upon the examiner's command.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated a significant difference (p<0.001) in all postural control variables in chronic LBP patients who lifted a load at different heights. In addition, there was a significant difference between all of the postural control measures of this study in healthy participants during load lifting at different heights (p<0.05), with the exception of the mediolateral standard deviation of velocity (p=0.067).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different lifting heights impact LBP patients' and healthy people's postural control differently. Postural control was more challenging during waist-to-overhead lifting in the patient group. This may be due to a stiffening strategy. The central nervous system reduces postural sway at higher centers of mass.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"70 4","pages":"460-467"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11868857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.12768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study investigated the influence of starting load position during lifting on postural control in nonspecific chronic low back pain (LBP) and healthy volunteers.

Patients and methods: The cross-sectional study included 20 healthy males (mean age: 31.8±7.4 years; range, 18 to 55 years) and 52 male patients (mean age: 33.4±9.2 years; range, 18 to 55 years) with chronic LBP between February 2016 and April 2018. Postural control characteristics were assessed by a force plate system. Center of pressure signals were obtained at a frequency of 100 Hz, and the mean of three trials was calculated. The participants were told to place their feet hip-width apart on the force plate while standing barefoot. They were then asked to lift a box weighing 10% of their body weight from the ground to waist height and then from waist height to overhead with straight elbows. They moved the box at their selected speed. The examinations began upon the examiner's command.

Results: Results indicated a significant difference (p<0.001) in all postural control variables in chronic LBP patients who lifted a load at different heights. In addition, there was a significant difference between all of the postural control measures of this study in healthy participants during load lifting at different heights (p<0.05), with the exception of the mediolateral standard deviation of velocity (p=0.067).

Conclusion: Different lifting heights impact LBP patients' and healthy people's postural control differently. Postural control was more challenging during waist-to-overhead lifting in the patient group. This may be due to a stiffening strategy. The central nervous system reduces postural sway at higher centers of mass.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信