Zennure Adıgüzel Şahin, Mehmet Üzel, Fatma Güler Kahraman Yıldırım, Mahmut Ercan Tanyeli, Ahmet Ertaş, Deniz Palamar, Tuğçe Özekli Mısırlıoğlu, Kenan Akgün, Ahmet Dirican
{"title":"Sensitivity and specificity assessment of four clinical tests for palmaris longus muscle by ultrasound.","authors":"Zennure Adıgüzel Şahin, Mehmet Üzel, Fatma Güler Kahraman Yıldırım, Mahmut Ercan Tanyeli, Ahmet Ertaş, Deniz Palamar, Tuğçe Özekli Mısırlıoğlu, Kenan Akgün, Ahmet Dirican","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2024.13746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of four clinical tests confirmed by ultrasonography (USG) and to evaluate the role of age, sex, handedness, subcutaneous tissue thickness (STT), tendon thickness (TT), and STT/TT in determining the absence of the palmaris longus muscle.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this descriptive study, 282 wrists of 141 healthy individuals (71 females, 70 males; mean age: 29±9.6 years; range, 21 to 55 years) were included between September 2021 and November 2022. The palmaris longus muscle tendon was identified by Schaeffer's test, Mishra's test I, Thompson's test, and Pushpakumar's test and then evaluated with USG. Before the tests, age, sex, and dominant hand information of the individuals were obtained. The STT and TT were measured with USG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity values by side were as follows (right/left respectively): Schaeffer's 92%/73%, Mishra's I 91%/93%, Thompson's 84%/87%, and Pushpakumar's 86%/91%. Specificity values by side were as follows (right/left respectively): Schaeffer's 87%/95%, Mishra's I 78%/82%, Thompson's 78%/79%, and Pushpakumar's 84%/82%. Sensitivity values by sex were as follows (female/male respectively): Schaeffer's 81%/96%, Mishra's I 92%/94%, Thompson's 85%/90%, and Pushpakumar's 91%/92%. Specificity values by sex were as follows (female/male respectively): Schaeffer's 68%/90%, Mishra's I 72%/90%, Thompson's 72%/85%, and Pushpakumar's 78%/85%. The intraclass correlation coefficient between clinical tests and USG was 0.94 for the left side and 0.95 for the right side.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mishra's test I and Pushpakumar's test can be used in females, while Schaeffer's test and Mishra's test I can be used in males as a mutually supportive clinical test. Furthermore, while there may be false negative and false positive test results due to muscle variations, it should be noted that STT/TT is also effective, particularly on the right side.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"70 4","pages":"525-531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11868856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.13746","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of four clinical tests confirmed by ultrasonography (USG) and to evaluate the role of age, sex, handedness, subcutaneous tissue thickness (STT), tendon thickness (TT), and STT/TT in determining the absence of the palmaris longus muscle.
Patients and methods: In this descriptive study, 282 wrists of 141 healthy individuals (71 females, 70 males; mean age: 29±9.6 years; range, 21 to 55 years) were included between September 2021 and November 2022. The palmaris longus muscle tendon was identified by Schaeffer's test, Mishra's test I, Thompson's test, and Pushpakumar's test and then evaluated with USG. Before the tests, age, sex, and dominant hand information of the individuals were obtained. The STT and TT were measured with USG.
Results: Sensitivity values by side were as follows (right/left respectively): Schaeffer's 92%/73%, Mishra's I 91%/93%, Thompson's 84%/87%, and Pushpakumar's 86%/91%. Specificity values by side were as follows (right/left respectively): Schaeffer's 87%/95%, Mishra's I 78%/82%, Thompson's 78%/79%, and Pushpakumar's 84%/82%. Sensitivity values by sex were as follows (female/male respectively): Schaeffer's 81%/96%, Mishra's I 92%/94%, Thompson's 85%/90%, and Pushpakumar's 91%/92%. Specificity values by sex were as follows (female/male respectively): Schaeffer's 68%/90%, Mishra's I 72%/90%, Thompson's 72%/85%, and Pushpakumar's 78%/85%. The intraclass correlation coefficient between clinical tests and USG was 0.94 for the left side and 0.95 for the right side.
Conclusion: Mishra's test I and Pushpakumar's test can be used in females, while Schaeffer's test and Mishra's test I can be used in males as a mutually supportive clinical test. Furthermore, while there may be false negative and false positive test results due to muscle variations, it should be noted that STT/TT is also effective, particularly on the right side.
目的:本研究旨在评估超声(USG)证实的四项临床检查的准确性,并评估年龄、性别、利手性、皮下组织厚度(STT)、肌腱厚度(TT)和STT/TT在判断掌长肌缺失中的作用。患者和方法:在这项描述性研究中,141名健康个体(71名女性,70名男性;平均年龄:29±9.6岁;范围为21至55岁),包括2021年9月至2022年11月。通过Schaeffer试验、Mishra试验I、Thompson试验和Pushpakumar试验确定掌长肌肌腱,然后用USG进行评估。测试前,获得受试者的年龄、性别和优势手信息。用USG测量STT和TT。结果:两侧敏感性值分别为:Schaeffer的92%/73%,Mishra的91%/93%,Thompson的84%/87%,Pushpakumar的86%/91%。两侧特异性值分别为(右/左):Schaeffer为87%/95%,Mishra为78%/82%,Thompson为78%/79%,Pushpakumar为84%/82%。性别敏感性值分别为:Schaeffer为81%/96%,Mishra为92%/94%,Thompson为85%/90%,Pushpakumar为91%/92%。性别特异性值分别为:Schaeffer为68%/90%,Mishra为72%/90%,Thompson为72%/85%,Pushpakumar为78%/85%。左侧和右侧临床试验与USG的类内相关系数分别为0.94和0.95。结论:Mishra’s test I和Pushpakumar’s test可用于女性,而Schaeffer’s test和Mishra’s test I可用于男性,作为一种相互支持的临床测试。此外,虽然由于肌肉变化可能会出现假阴性和假阳性的测试结果,但应该注意的是,STT/TT也是有效的,特别是在右侧。
期刊介绍:
The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).