Addressing spirituality-related moral challenges in palliative care: perspectives of spiritual counselors.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Shanti Bolt, Suzanne Metselaar, Tonke Versteeg, Charlotte Kröger
{"title":"Addressing spirituality-related moral challenges in palliative care: perspectives of spiritual counselors.","authors":"Shanti Bolt, Suzanne Metselaar, Tonke Versteeg, Charlotte Kröger","doi":"10.1080/08854726.2025.2471740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spiritual beliefs are increasingly important toward the end-of-life as they shape perspectives on good care, life, and death. However, in pluralistic societies, the spiritual beliefs of patients and care providers may differ. Care providers can find it difficult to be responsive to spiritual diversity and to how different belief systems of patients and their families may influence perspectives on care and dying. This can lead to moral challenges. Dialogical clinical ethics support (CES) helps care providers to jointly reflect on and deal with moral challenges. However, while spirituality shapes perspectives on good care, it is rarely addressed explicitly in CES sessions. We interviewed ten spiritual counselors of different denominations in The Netherlands to explore spirituality-related moral challenges in the delivery of palliative care, and to gain insight into their perspectives on what is needed to make both dialogues with patients and family and dialogical CES more responsive to spiritual diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":45330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2025.2471740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spiritual beliefs are increasingly important toward the end-of-life as they shape perspectives on good care, life, and death. However, in pluralistic societies, the spiritual beliefs of patients and care providers may differ. Care providers can find it difficult to be responsive to spiritual diversity and to how different belief systems of patients and their families may influence perspectives on care and dying. This can lead to moral challenges. Dialogical clinical ethics support (CES) helps care providers to jointly reflect on and deal with moral challenges. However, while spirituality shapes perspectives on good care, it is rarely addressed explicitly in CES sessions. We interviewed ten spiritual counselors of different denominations in The Netherlands to explore spirituality-related moral challenges in the delivery of palliative care, and to gain insight into their perspectives on what is needed to make both dialogues with patients and family and dialogical CES more responsive to spiritual diversity.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy
Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy publishes peer-reviewed, scholarly articles based on original research, quality assurance/improvement studies, descriptions of programs and interventions, program/intervention evaluations, and literature reviews on topics pertinent to pastoral/spiritual care, clinical pastoral education, chaplaincy, and spirituality in relation to physical and mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信