Outperforming Traditional Staging: A Novel Nomogram for HR-Positive Breast Cancer.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S485685
Chaoxing Liu, Jiabin Ding, Jinbiao Xu, Chen Fang, GuoHua Zhang, Chao Shi, Feng Qiu
{"title":"Outperforming Traditional Staging: A Novel Nomogram for HR-Positive Breast Cancer.","authors":"Chaoxing Liu, Jiabin Ding, Jinbiao Xu, Chen Fang, GuoHua Zhang, Chao Shi, Feng Qiu","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S485685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR-positive BC), the most prevalent subtype, typically has a favorable prognosis. However, treatment decision-making and survival prediction remain challenging due to the limitations of traditional staging systems like AJCC. Improved prognostic tools are needed to enhance individualized risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Clinical information from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were analyzed to evaluate outcomes across HR-positive BC subtypes. Patients were divided into training and validation cohorts. A prognostic nomogram was developed using factors identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and evaluated through C-index, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 156,378 patients (training) and 67,016 (validation) for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and 165,047 (training) and 70,732 (validation) for overall survival (OS), along with 232 external validation cases. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the ER-positive/PR-negative (HR=2.317 (2.219-2.419)) and ER-negative/PR-positive (HR=3.498 (3.143-3.894)) subtypes had worse prognosis than ER-positive/PR-positive patients. The prognosis of ER-negative/PR-positive subtype (HR=1.511 (1.686-1.351)) was also worse than that of ER-positive/PR-negative subtype. A nomogram integrating age, race, tumor size, grade, histology, bone, brain, lung, and liver metastases, tumor stage, HER2, marital status, positive lymph node numbers, and radiation therapy. The nomogram had a good C-index values and area under curve values for predicting OS and BCSS in both the training and validation set. Moreover, the DCA revealed that the nomogram performed better than the AJCC (TNM) staging system in predicting the three- and five-year OS and BCSS in both the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study introduces and validates a novel prognostic nomogram for HR-positive BC, providing enhanced risk stratification, particularly in regions with limited access to comprehensive genetic testing. Further validation through multicenter clinical studies is recommended to confirm its clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"21 ","pages":"191-208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S485685","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR-positive BC), the most prevalent subtype, typically has a favorable prognosis. However, treatment decision-making and survival prediction remain challenging due to the limitations of traditional staging systems like AJCC. Improved prognostic tools are needed to enhance individualized risk stratification.

Materials and methods: Clinical information from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were analyzed to evaluate outcomes across HR-positive BC subtypes. Patients were divided into training and validation cohorts. A prognostic nomogram was developed using factors identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and evaluated through C-index, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: The study included 156,378 patients (training) and 67,016 (validation) for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and 165,047 (training) and 70,732 (validation) for overall survival (OS), along with 232 external validation cases. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the ER-positive/PR-negative (HR=2.317 (2.219-2.419)) and ER-negative/PR-positive (HR=3.498 (3.143-3.894)) subtypes had worse prognosis than ER-positive/PR-positive patients. The prognosis of ER-negative/PR-positive subtype (HR=1.511 (1.686-1.351)) was also worse than that of ER-positive/PR-negative subtype. A nomogram integrating age, race, tumor size, grade, histology, bone, brain, lung, and liver metastases, tumor stage, HER2, marital status, positive lymph node numbers, and radiation therapy. The nomogram had a good C-index values and area under curve values for predicting OS and BCSS in both the training and validation set. Moreover, the DCA revealed that the nomogram performed better than the AJCC (TNM) staging system in predicting the three- and five-year OS and BCSS in both the groups.

Conclusion: This study introduces and validates a novel prognostic nomogram for HR-positive BC, providing enhanced risk stratification, particularly in regions with limited access to comprehensive genetic testing. Further validation through multicenter clinical studies is recommended to confirm its clinical utility.

优于传统分期:一种新的hr阳性乳腺癌Nomogram。
背景:激素受体阳性乳腺癌(hr阳性BC)是最常见的亚型,通常具有良好的预后。然而,由于AJCC等传统分期系统的局限性,治疗决策和生存预测仍然具有挑战性。需要改进预后工具来加强个体化风险分层。材料和方法:分析来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库和南昌大学第一附属医院的临床信息,评估hr阳性BC亚型的结局。患者被分为训练组和验证组。使用单因素和多因素Cox回归分析确定的因素,并通过c指数、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估预后nomogram。结果:该研究包括乳腺癌特异性生存期(BCSS) 156,378例(培训)和67,016例(验证),总生存期(OS) 165,047例(培训)和70,732例(验证),以及232例外部验证病例。多因素Cox回归分析显示,er阳性/ pr阴性亚型(HR=2.317(2.219 ~ 2.419))和er阴性/ pr阳性亚型(HR=3.498(3.143 ~ 3.894))预后较er阳性/ pr阳性患者差。er阴性/ pr阳性亚型(HR=1.511(1.686-1.351))预后也较er阳性/ pr阴性亚型差。结合年龄、种族、肿瘤大小、分级、组织学、骨、脑、肺和肝转移、肿瘤分期、HER2、婚姻状况、阳性淋巴结数和放射治疗的nomogram放射图。在训练集和验证集上,nomogram均具有较好的预测OS和BCSS的c指数值和曲线下面积值。此外,DCA显示nomogram在预测两组患者的3年和5年OS和BCSS方面优于AJCC (TNM)分期系统。结论:本研究引入并验证了一种新的hr阳性BC预后图,提供了增强的风险分层,特别是在无法获得全面基因检测的地区。建议通过多中心临床研究进一步验证其临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信