Nomogram-Based Prediction of 3-Month Unfavorable Outcome and Early Neurological Deterioration After Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S505897
Yixuan Wu, Jiaxin Han, Yawen Cheng, Meng Wei, Fude Liu, Chen Chen, Ying Tan, Wenlong Ma, Jia Yu, Jianfeng Han, Guogang Luo, Kang Huo
{"title":"Nomogram-Based Prediction of 3-Month Unfavorable Outcome and Early Neurological Deterioration After Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Yixuan Wu, Jiaxin Han, Yawen Cheng, Meng Wei, Fude Liu, Chen Chen, Ying Tan, Wenlong Ma, Jia Yu, Jianfeng Han, Guogang Luo, Kang Huo","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S505897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients due to large-vessel occlusion, who underwent endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), continue to experience unfavorable outcomes. Furthermore, the impact of internal carotid artery (ICA) tortuosity remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the value of ICA tortuosity and clinical features in predicting 3-month unfavorable outcome and early neurological deterioration (END) after EVT in AIS patients through nomograms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 313 AIS patients treated with EVT at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University were retrospectively analyzed and randomized into two cohorts: training cohort (n=219) and validation cohort (n=94). After the selection of relevant features, nomograms for predicting the 3-month unfavorable outcome (mRS > 2) and END (an increase in NIHSS score of ≥4 within 24 hours) were established. The predictive accuracy of the nomograms was evaluated using ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 313 patients, ICA tortuosity was observed in 19.50% (extracranial) and 21.10% (cavernous) of patients. Furthermore, 53.30% of patients experienced a 3-month unfavorable outcome, while END occurred in 15.70%. The independent predictors for the 3-month unfavorable outcome included age, NIHSS score, puncture-to-recanalization time, eTICI score, and blood glucose. The addition of two tortuosity features (extracranial and cavernous ICA tortuosity) resulted in a significant improvement in model differentiation. The nomogram that included ICA tortuosity achieved an AUC of 0.826 and 0.803 in the training and validation cohorts. ASPECT score, occlusion site, number of retriever passes, and blood glucose were identified as factors associated with END. The AUC was 0.770 and 0.772 in the training and validation cohorts. However, the incorporation of ICA tortuosity did not significantly enhance the model for predicting END.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICA tortuosity characteristics significantly improve the discrimination of the nomogram model in predicting the 3-month unfavorable outcome. This can be used as guidance in clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"21 ","pages":"239-256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S505897","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Some acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients due to large-vessel occlusion, who underwent endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), continue to experience unfavorable outcomes. Furthermore, the impact of internal carotid artery (ICA) tortuosity remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the value of ICA tortuosity and clinical features in predicting 3-month unfavorable outcome and early neurological deterioration (END) after EVT in AIS patients through nomograms.

Methods: A total of 313 AIS patients treated with EVT at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University were retrospectively analyzed and randomized into two cohorts: training cohort (n=219) and validation cohort (n=94). After the selection of relevant features, nomograms for predicting the 3-month unfavorable outcome (mRS > 2) and END (an increase in NIHSS score of ≥4 within 24 hours) were established. The predictive accuracy of the nomograms was evaluated using ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: Among 313 patients, ICA tortuosity was observed in 19.50% (extracranial) and 21.10% (cavernous) of patients. Furthermore, 53.30% of patients experienced a 3-month unfavorable outcome, while END occurred in 15.70%. The independent predictors for the 3-month unfavorable outcome included age, NIHSS score, puncture-to-recanalization time, eTICI score, and blood glucose. The addition of two tortuosity features (extracranial and cavernous ICA tortuosity) resulted in a significant improvement in model differentiation. The nomogram that included ICA tortuosity achieved an AUC of 0.826 and 0.803 in the training and validation cohorts. ASPECT score, occlusion site, number of retriever passes, and blood glucose were identified as factors associated with END. The AUC was 0.770 and 0.772 in the training and validation cohorts. However, the incorporation of ICA tortuosity did not significantly enhance the model for predicting END.

Conclusion: ICA tortuosity characteristics significantly improve the discrimination of the nomogram model in predicting the 3-month unfavorable outcome. This can be used as guidance in clinical decision-making.

急性缺血性卒中血管内取栓术后3个月不良预后及早期神经功能恶化的影像学预测。
背景:一些急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者由于大血管闭塞,接受血管内血栓切除术(EVT),继续经历不利的结果。此外,颈内动脉(ICA)扭曲的影响仍不确定。本研究旨在通过影像学检查确定ICA弯曲度和临床特征在预测AIS患者EVT术后3个月不良预后和早期神经功能恶化(END)中的价值。方法:回顾性分析在西安交通大学第一附属医院接受EVT治疗的AIS患者313例,随机分为训练组(219例)和验证组(94例)。选择相关特征后,建立预测3个月不良结局(mRS > 2)和END(24小时内NIHSS评分增加≥4)的nomogram。使用ROC曲线、校正图和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估nomogram预测准确性。结果:313例患者中,19.50%(颅外)和21.10%(海绵体)患者出现ICA扭曲。此外,53.30%的患者出现了3个月的不良结果,而发生END的患者比例为15.70%。3个月不良预后的独立预测因子包括年龄、NIHSS评分、穿刺至再通时间、eTICI评分和血糖。两种扭曲特征(颅外和海绵状ICA扭曲)的增加导致模型分化的显著改善。在训练组和验证组中,包含ICA扭曲的nomogram AUC分别为0.826和0.803。ASPECT评分、闭塞部位、猎犬通过次数和血糖被确定为与END相关的因素。训练组和验证组的AUC分别为0.770和0.772。然而,ICA扭曲度的加入并没有显著增强预测END的模型。结论:ICA扭曲特征显著提高了诺图模型预测3个月不良预后的识别率。这可以作为临床决策的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信