Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with New-Onset ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-21 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.31083/RCM25758
Min Chen, Cuiling Sun, Li Yang, Ting Zhang, Jing Zhang, Chunli Chen
{"title":"Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with New-Onset ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Min Chen, Cuiling Sun, Li Yang, Ting Zhang, Jing Zhang, Chunli Chen","doi":"10.31083/RCM25758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with new-onset ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) using four machine learning (ML) algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 250 new-onset STEMI patients were retrospectively collected. Feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm. Four ML algorithms-K-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Complement Naive Bayes (CNB), and logistic regression-were applied to predict MACE risk. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis was used to rank feature importance, and a nomogram was constructed for risk visualization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Logistic regression showed the best performance (AUC = 0.814 in training, 0.776 in validation) compared to KNN, SVM, and CNB. SHAP analysis identified seven key predictors, including Killip classification, Gensini score, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), heart rate (HR), creatinine (CR), glutamine transferase (GLT), and platelet count (PCT). The nomogram provided accurate risk predictions with strong agreement between predicted and observed outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The logistic regression model effectively predicts MACE risk after PCI in STEMI patients. The nomogram serves as a practical tool for clinicians, supporting personalized risk assessment and improving clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"25758"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11868916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM25758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with new-onset ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) using four machine learning (ML) algorithms.

Methods: Data from 250 new-onset STEMI patients were retrospectively collected. Feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm. Four ML algorithms-K-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Complement Naive Bayes (CNB), and logistic regression-were applied to predict MACE risk. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis was used to rank feature importance, and a nomogram was constructed for risk visualization.

Results: Logistic regression showed the best performance (AUC = 0.814 in training, 0.776 in validation) compared to KNN, SVM, and CNB. SHAP analysis identified seven key predictors, including Killip classification, Gensini score, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), heart rate (HR), creatinine (CR), glutamine transferase (GLT), and platelet count (PCT). The nomogram provided accurate risk predictions with strong agreement between predicted and observed outcomes.

Conclusions: The logistic regression model effectively predicts MACE risk after PCI in STEMI patients. The nomogram serves as a practical tool for clinicians, supporting personalized risk assessment and improving clinical decision-making.

应用机器学习算法预测新发 ST 段抬高心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的主要不良心血管事件。
背景:本研究旨在利用四种机器学习(ML)算法建立并验证新发st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的预测模型。方法:回顾性收集250例新发STEMI患者的资料。采用Boruta算法进行特征选择。四种ML算法- k近邻(KNN),支持向量机(SVM),补充朴素贝叶斯(CNB)和逻辑回归-被用于预测MACE风险。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性评估模型的性能。使用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)分析对特征重要性进行排序,并构建nomogram用于风险可视化。结果:与KNN、SVM和CNB相比,Logistic回归的训练AUC = 0.814,验证AUC = 0.776。SHAP分析确定了7个关键预测因子,包括Killip分类、Gensini评分、血尿素氮(BUN)、心率(HR)、肌酐(CR)、谷氨酰胺转移酶(GLT)和血小板计数(PCT)。nomogram提供了准确的风险预测,预测结果和观察结果非常一致。结论:logistic回归模型可有效预测STEMI患者PCI术后MACE风险。nomogram是临床医生的实用工具,支持个性化风险评估和改善临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信