Understanding Alignment in the Execution of Extractable Screening Studies Between Laboratories: Results of the ELSIE Lab Practices Sub-Team Industry Surveys.

Q3 Medicine
Steven A Zdravkovic, Qiang Fu, Aaron Flick, Bhargava Jana, Elizabeth Looney, Samuel Kikandi, Tim Verdonck, Lee Nagao, Mary Kate Bielinski
{"title":"Understanding Alignment in the Execution of Extractable Screening Studies Between Laboratories: Results of the ELSIE Lab Practices Sub-Team Industry Surveys.","authors":"Steven A Zdravkovic, Qiang Fu, Aaron Flick, Bhargava Jana, Elizabeth Looney, Samuel Kikandi, Tim Verdonck, Lee Nagao, Mary Kate Bielinski","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2024.012964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Substances that can be extracted (<i>extractables</i>) from the components of a medical device or a pharmaceutical product's manufacturing, packaging, and/or delivery system(s) are characterized as part of an extractable screening study to ensure the safety of the associated therapy. While the requirements of such studies have been established on a strategic level, the tactical approaches for their execution are less controlled, and as such, have been established on a laboratory-by-laboratory basis. Based on anecdotal accounts, differences in these tactical variables have resulted in inconsistent data obtained between laboratories when all other factors are equal. To better understand this potential issue, the Lab Practices Working Group within the Extractable & Leachable Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE) has conducted two surveys of the practices used by several pharmaceutical sponsors and contract research organizations for their execution of extractable screening studies. The results obtained from these surveys uncovered a lack of alignment in some experimental variables for the execution of these studies including selection and use of surrogate standard(s), establishment of system suitability, qualification of screening methods, and use of uncertainty factors. Accordingly, it was concluded that the potential exists for at least some differences in the data obtained from extractable screening studies between laboratories due to the inconsistencies in their execution uncovered in these surveys.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":"79 1","pages":"4-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024.012964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Substances that can be extracted (extractables) from the components of a medical device or a pharmaceutical product's manufacturing, packaging, and/or delivery system(s) are characterized as part of an extractable screening study to ensure the safety of the associated therapy. While the requirements of such studies have been established on a strategic level, the tactical approaches for their execution are less controlled, and as such, have been established on a laboratory-by-laboratory basis. Based on anecdotal accounts, differences in these tactical variables have resulted in inconsistent data obtained between laboratories when all other factors are equal. To better understand this potential issue, the Lab Practices Working Group within the Extractable & Leachable Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE) has conducted two surveys of the practices used by several pharmaceutical sponsors and contract research organizations for their execution of extractable screening studies. The results obtained from these surveys uncovered a lack of alignment in some experimental variables for the execution of these studies including selection and use of surrogate standard(s), establishment of system suitability, qualification of screening methods, and use of uncertainty factors. Accordingly, it was concluded that the potential exists for at least some differences in the data obtained from extractable screening studies between laboratories due to the inconsistencies in their execution uncovered in these surveys.

理解在实验室之间执行可提取筛选研究的一致性:ELSIE实验室实践子团队行业调查的结果。
可以从医疗器械或药品的制造、包装和/或输送系统的组件中提取(可提取)的物质被表征为可提取筛选研究的一部分,以确保相关治疗的安全性。虽然这类研究的需要是在战略一级确定的,但执行这些研究的战术方法较少受到控制,因此是在逐个实验室的基础上确定的。根据传闻,在所有其他因素相同的情况下,这些战术变量的差异导致实验室之间获得的数据不一致。为了更好地理解这一潜在问题,可提取和可浸出安全信息交换(ELSIE)的实验室实践工作组对几家制药赞助商和合同研究组织在执行可提取筛选研究时使用的实践进行了两次调查。从这些调查中获得的结果发现,在执行这些研究时,一些实验变量缺乏一致性,包括替代标准的选择和使用、系统适用性的建立、筛选方法的鉴定以及不确定因素的使用。因此,得出的结论是,由于这些调查中发现的执行不一致,实验室之间从可提取筛选研究中获得的数据至少存在一些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信