Cryoanalgesia for Pain Management After Pectus Excavatum Repair (COPPER) in Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pediatric Anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1111/pan.15090
M Bastianello, M Torre, R Bonfiglio, M G Calevo, L Palomba, P Uva, A Kanapari, G Lorenzoni, N Disma
{"title":"Cryoanalgesia for Pain Management After Pectus Excavatum Repair (COPPER) in Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"M Bastianello, M Torre, R Bonfiglio, M G Calevo, L Palomba, P Uva, A Kanapari, G Lorenzoni, N Disma","doi":"10.1111/pan.15090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing Pectus Excavatum repair with the minimally invasive approach frequently report severe postoperative pain. The goal of the study is to determine the superiority of cryoanalgesia compared to standard of care for return to normal quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, active controlled, parallel groups trial (category IIb medical device) was designed for patients undergoing pectus excavatum repair. Participants were screened from the elective surgical lists at Istituto Gaslini, Genova, Italy, and they all were part of the academic practice setting. Once enrolled, patients were randomly assigned to one of the two study arms: cryoanalgesia vs. standard of care (epidural-based analgesia). The primary outcome was the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) and the subcomponents (psychosocial and physical health) 14 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee (278/2021-DB id 11 421) and conducted between February 2022 and October 2023. Eighty-eight patients were enrolled in the study: forty-five to cryoanalgesia and forty-three in the epidural arm. The PedsQL median (IQR) at the 14th day was 59.8 (48.4, 71.2) vs. 67.9 (58.7, 73.9) (95% CI: 0.46-13; difference 6.5; p = 0.07) with ITT analysis, and 59.8 (48.37, 71.20) vs. 69.02 (58.70, 73.91) (95% CI: 0.82, 14; difference 7.4; p = 0.028) with PP analysis, in the cryoanalgesia and in the standard of care group, respectively. Irrespective of treatment, a significant decrease in both the PedsQL total score and its subcomponents was found. This effect persisted when stratified by treatment: physical health showed a decrease in both arms, while psychosocial health demonstrated a more marked decrease in the standard of care arm (q-value = 0.028), but not in the cryoanalgesia arm (q-value = 0.056).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cryoanalgesia did not improve return to baseline quality of life 2 weeks after surgery. However, it showed to be beneficial in the psychosocial component of the PedsQL scale.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05201820.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"347-358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975181/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.15090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing Pectus Excavatum repair with the minimally invasive approach frequently report severe postoperative pain. The goal of the study is to determine the superiority of cryoanalgesia compared to standard of care for return to normal quality of life.

Methods: A randomized, active controlled, parallel groups trial (category IIb medical device) was designed for patients undergoing pectus excavatum repair. Participants were screened from the elective surgical lists at Istituto Gaslini, Genova, Italy, and they all were part of the academic practice setting. Once enrolled, patients were randomly assigned to one of the two study arms: cryoanalgesia vs. standard of care (epidural-based analgesia). The primary outcome was the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) and the subcomponents (psychosocial and physical health) 14 days after surgery.

Results: Protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee (278/2021-DB id 11 421) and conducted between February 2022 and October 2023. Eighty-eight patients were enrolled in the study: forty-five to cryoanalgesia and forty-three in the epidural arm. The PedsQL median (IQR) at the 14th day was 59.8 (48.4, 71.2) vs. 67.9 (58.7, 73.9) (95% CI: 0.46-13; difference 6.5; p = 0.07) with ITT analysis, and 59.8 (48.37, 71.20) vs. 69.02 (58.70, 73.91) (95% CI: 0.82, 14; difference 7.4; p = 0.028) with PP analysis, in the cryoanalgesia and in the standard of care group, respectively. Irrespective of treatment, a significant decrease in both the PedsQL total score and its subcomponents was found. This effect persisted when stratified by treatment: physical health showed a decrease in both arms, while psychosocial health demonstrated a more marked decrease in the standard of care arm (q-value = 0.028), but not in the cryoanalgesia arm (q-value = 0.056).

Conclusions: Cryoanalgesia did not improve return to baseline quality of life 2 weeks after surgery. However, it showed to be beneficial in the psychosocial component of the PedsQL scale.

Trial registration: NCT05201820.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信