{"title":"Myostatin Knockout Mice Have Larger Muscle Fibers With Normal Function and Morphology.","authors":"Hans Degens, Ketan Patel, A Matsakas","doi":"10.1002/mus.28389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We assessed whether muscle fibers in myostatin knockout (MSTN-/-) mice are just larger or also exhibit morphological, metabolic, and functional differences from MSTN+/+ mice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared single fiber contractile properties and histological fiber properties in muscles from MSTN-/- and MSTN+/+ mice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Even though in permeabilized muscle fibers from the extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscle maximal force was higher (p < 0.001) there were no significant differences in specific power (power per unit volume), specific tension (force per cross-sectional area), maximal shortening velocity, or curvature of the force-velocity relationship between MSTN-/- and MSTN+/+ mice. In histological sections of the soleus muscle, fibers were larger (p < 0.001), but the succinate dehydrogenase staining intensity and capillary density did not differ significantly between MSTN-/- and MSTN+/+ mice, which was explicable by the larger number of capillaries around a fiber (p < 0.001). A model showed no significant differences in soleus muscle oxygenation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The larger force-generating capacity of fibers from MSTN-/- mice is explicable by the larger fiber cross-sectional area. The data indicate that muscle fibers from MSTN-/- mice are quantitatively, but not qualitatively different from muscle fibers from MSTN+/+ mice. Myostatin inhibition may help increase muscle mass in conditions accompanied by muscle weakness without a detrimental impact on muscle quality, but systemic side effects need to be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: We assessed whether muscle fibers in myostatin knockout (MSTN-/-) mice are just larger or also exhibit morphological, metabolic, and functional differences from MSTN+/+ mice.
Methods: We compared single fiber contractile properties and histological fiber properties in muscles from MSTN-/- and MSTN+/+ mice.
Results: Even though in permeabilized muscle fibers from the extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscle maximal force was higher (p < 0.001) there were no significant differences in specific power (power per unit volume), specific tension (force per cross-sectional area), maximal shortening velocity, or curvature of the force-velocity relationship between MSTN-/- and MSTN+/+ mice. In histological sections of the soleus muscle, fibers were larger (p < 0.001), but the succinate dehydrogenase staining intensity and capillary density did not differ significantly between MSTN-/- and MSTN+/+ mice, which was explicable by the larger number of capillaries around a fiber (p < 0.001). A model showed no significant differences in soleus muscle oxygenation.
Discussion: The larger force-generating capacity of fibers from MSTN-/- mice is explicable by the larger fiber cross-sectional area. The data indicate that muscle fibers from MSTN-/- mice are quantitatively, but not qualitatively different from muscle fibers from MSTN+/+ mice. Myostatin inhibition may help increase muscle mass in conditions accompanied by muscle weakness without a detrimental impact on muscle quality, but systemic side effects need to be considered.
期刊介绍:
Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.