Association with perceived stress and feasibility of an app for patient-reported stressor experiences during treatment in an intensive care unit: a nonrandomized controlled study (ICU Feel Better App).

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Laura Hancke, Nick Schmid, Henning Krampe, Claudia Denke, Vivian Mauersberger, Patrick Heeren, Maximilian M Wunderlich, Enrico Dähnert, Felix Balzer, Claudia D Spies
{"title":"Association with perceived stress and feasibility of an app for patient-reported stressor experiences during treatment in an intensive care unit: a nonrandomized controlled study (ICU Feel Better App).","authors":"Laura Hancke, Nick Schmid, Henning Krampe, Claudia Denke, Vivian Mauersberger, Patrick Heeren, Maximilian M Wunderlich, Enrico Dähnert, Felix Balzer, Claudia D Spies","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18331-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critically ill patients often experience substantial stress during their ICU treatment. The ICU Feel Better App is a novel mobile application that patients can use to evaluate ICU-related stressors during their stay. We aimed to investigate if using the app, without feedback to the ICU staff, would be associated with changes in perceived acute stress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study used a before-and-after design. Data were collected at the beginning of ICU treatment (T1) and at discharge from ICU (T2). The comparison group (N.=20) received treatment as usual, i.e. standard critical care including assessment and treatment of pain and delirium. The App group (N.=20) used the ICU Feel Better App, which included 24 common ICU-related stressors, between T1 and T2. Secondary outcomes included app use extent and patients' ratings of acceptance and usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in clinical characteristics or stress levels between treatment groups at T1, T2, and from T1 to T2. Each app session averaged a median of 1.82 minutes (IQR: 1.54-2.66), with users averaging 8.5 sessions over 3.5 days, totaling 16.16 minutes of use (IQR: 9.72-27.51). Patients found the app highly usable and acceptable, with assistance needed in only one session for three users and no premature terminations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lack of significant stress reduction suggests that the effectiveness of the app could be improved by incorporating feedback mechanisms to communicate patients' stressor evaluations to staff, prompting stress-reducing measures. Data on app use, acceptability, and usability indicate feasibility of the ICU Feel Better App.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":"91 1-2","pages":"58-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18331-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Critically ill patients often experience substantial stress during their ICU treatment. The ICU Feel Better App is a novel mobile application that patients can use to evaluate ICU-related stressors during their stay. We aimed to investigate if using the app, without feedback to the ICU staff, would be associated with changes in perceived acute stress.

Methods: This prospective cohort study used a before-and-after design. Data were collected at the beginning of ICU treatment (T1) and at discharge from ICU (T2). The comparison group (N.=20) received treatment as usual, i.e. standard critical care including assessment and treatment of pain and delirium. The App group (N.=20) used the ICU Feel Better App, which included 24 common ICU-related stressors, between T1 and T2. Secondary outcomes included app use extent and patients' ratings of acceptance and usability.

Results: No significant differences were observed in clinical characteristics or stress levels between treatment groups at T1, T2, and from T1 to T2. Each app session averaged a median of 1.82 minutes (IQR: 1.54-2.66), with users averaging 8.5 sessions over 3.5 days, totaling 16.16 minutes of use (IQR: 9.72-27.51). Patients found the app highly usable and acceptable, with assistance needed in only one session for three users and no premature terminations.

Conclusions: The lack of significant stress reduction suggests that the effectiveness of the app could be improved by incorporating feedback mechanisms to communicate patients' stressor evaluations to staff, prompting stress-reducing measures. Data on app use, acceptability, and usability indicate feasibility of the ICU Feel Better App.

在重症监护病房治疗期间,患者报告压力源体验的应用程序与感知压力的关联和可行性:一项非随机对照研究(ICU Feel Better app)。
背景:危重症患者在ICU治疗期间经常经历巨大的压力。ICU Feel Better App是一款新颖的移动应用程序,患者可以在住院期间使用它来评估ICU相关的压力源。我们的目的是调查在没有向ICU工作人员反馈的情况下使用该应用程序是否与感知急性压力的变化有关。方法:前瞻性队列研究采用前后对照设计。在ICU治疗开始时(T1)和出院时(T2)收集数据。对照组(20例)照常治疗,即标准重症监护,包括疼痛和谵妄的评估和治疗。应用程序组(n =20)在T1和T2之间使用ICU Feel Better应用程序,其中包括24种常见的ICU相关压力源。次要结果包括应用程序的使用程度和患者的接受度和可用性评分。结果:治疗组在T1、T2、T1至T2时的临床特征及应激水平均无显著差异。每个应用会话的平均中位数为1.82分钟(IQR: 1.54-2.66),用户在3.5天内平均使用8.5次,总计使用16.16分钟(IQR: 9.72-27.51)。患者发现这款应用非常有用,也很容易接受,三个用户只需一次就能获得帮助,而且不会过早终止妊娠。结论:该应用缺乏显著的压力缓解效果,表明可以通过加入反馈机制,将患者的压力源评估传达给工作人员,促使采取减压措施,从而提高应用的有效性。应用程序的使用、可接受性和可用性数据表明ICU Feel Better应用程序的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信