Heart Transplant Equity: Effect of 2018 Allocation Policy Change on Recipient Mortality and Morbidity by Race and Ethnicity.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Alisa Pugacheva, Selena S Li, Seyed Alirez Rabi, Thais Faggion Vinholo, Eriberto Michel, Ruby Singh, Asishana A Osho
{"title":"Heart Transplant Equity: Effect of 2018 Allocation Policy Change on Recipient Mortality and Morbidity by Race and Ethnicity.","authors":"Alisa Pugacheva, Selena S Li, Seyed Alirez Rabi, Thais Faggion Vinholo, Eriberto Michel, Ruby Singh, Asishana A Osho","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2018, the US heart allocation policy was changed from 3 tiers to 6 tiers for a more granular assessment of patients' medical urgency. Given previous studies showing significant discrepancies in posttransplantation outcomes among Black and Hispanic minority groups, we investigated the effects of the allocation policy change on these groups.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Adult heart transplantation patients from October 18, 2014, to October 18, 2022, were included from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Multiorgan transplants and retransplants were excluded. One to one propensity matching was performed by race and ethnicity and allocation score era. The primary outcome was overall (4-year) survival assessed using multivariable Cox regression in an unmatched cohort; secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 1-year rejection, short-term mortality, and graft failure, assessed using conditional logistic regression in the matched cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cohort included 19,731 patients; 13,001 White, 4,784 Black, and 1,946 Hispanic. White, Black, and Hispanic cohorts in matched analysis demonstrated postallocation change improvements in in-hospital and 1-year rejection (all p < 0.05) and comparable short-term mortality and graft failure (all p > 0.05). In adjusted analyses, Black recipients had comparable overall mortality to White recipients both pre- (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.04 [0.92, 1.18], p = 0.514) and postallocation change (aHR 1.10 [0.95, 1.27], p = 0.194). Postallocation change, Black recipients had a higher risk of overall mortality (aHR 1.20 [1.01, 1.42], p = 0.033), whereas Hispanic recipients had lower risk of mortality (aHR 0.72 [0.55, 0.94], p = 0.015) compared with White recipients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis demonstrates improved acute rejection rates postallocation change, by race and ethnicity; however, there remain disparities in short- and long-term recipient mortality for Black recipients in the postallocation change era. Future studies will explore the factors impacting long-term survival among these groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"884-896"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001374","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2018, the US heart allocation policy was changed from 3 tiers to 6 tiers for a more granular assessment of patients' medical urgency. Given previous studies showing significant discrepancies in posttransplantation outcomes among Black and Hispanic minority groups, we investigated the effects of the allocation policy change on these groups.

Study design: Adult heart transplantation patients from October 18, 2014, to October 18, 2022, were included from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Multiorgan transplants and retransplants were excluded. One to one propensity matching was performed by race and ethnicity and allocation score era. The primary outcome was overall (4-year) survival assessed using multivariable Cox regression in an unmatched cohort; secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 1-year rejection, short-term mortality, and graft failure, assessed using conditional logistic regression in the matched cohort.

Results: The total cohort included 19,731 patients; 13,001 White, 4,784 Black, and 1,946 Hispanic. White, Black, and Hispanic cohorts in matched analysis demonstrated postallocation change improvements in in-hospital and 1-year rejection (all p < 0.05) and comparable short-term mortality and graft failure (all p > 0.05). In adjusted analyses, Black recipients had comparable overall mortality to White recipients both pre- (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.04 [0.92, 1.18], p = 0.514) and postallocation change (aHR 1.10 [0.95, 1.27], p = 0.194). Postallocation change, Black recipients had a higher risk of overall mortality (aHR 1.20 [1.01, 1.42], p = 0.033), whereas Hispanic recipients had lower risk of mortality (aHR 0.72 [0.55, 0.94], p = 0.015) compared with White recipients.

Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates improved acute rejection rates postallocation change, by race and ethnicity; however, there remain disparities in short- and long-term recipient mortality for Black recipients in the postallocation change era. Future studies will explore the factors impacting long-term survival among these groups.

心脏移植公平性:2018年分配政策变化对不同种族和民族受者死亡率和发病率的影响
背景:2018年,美国心脏分配政策从3级改为6级,以更细致地评估患者的医疗紧迫性。鉴于先前的研究显示黑人和西班牙裔少数群体移植后预后存在显著差异,我们调查了分配政策变化对这些群体的影响。方法:2014年10月18日至2022年10月18日的成人心脏移植患者从美国器官共享网络(UNOS)数据库中纳入。排除多器官移植和再移植。按种族/民族和分配分数时代进行1:1倾向匹配。主要结局是在未匹配队列中使用多变量Cox回归评估总(4年)生存率;次要结局是住院和1年排斥反应、短期死亡率和移植物衰竭,在匹配队列中使用条件logistic回归进行评估。结果:总队列包括19,731例患者;13001名白人,4784名黑人,1946名西班牙裔。匹配分析中的白人、黑人和西班牙裔队列显示,分配后的院内排异反应和1年排异反应有所改善(均p0.05)。在调整分析中,黑人受者与白人受者在分配前(aHR=1.04[0.92,1.18], p=0.514)和分配后的死亡率变化(aHR=1.10[0.95,1.27], p=0.194)的总体死亡率相当。分配改变后,与白人受试者相比,黑人受试者的总死亡率风险较高(aHR=1.20[1.01,1.42], p=0.033),而西班牙裔受试者的死亡率风险较低(aHR=0.72[0.55,0.94], p=0.015)。结论:该分析表明,按种族/民族划分,分配改变后急性排异率有所改善,然而,分配改变后黑人受者的短期和长期死亡率仍然存在差异。未来的研究将探索影响这些群体长期生存的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信