Heart Transplant Equity: Effect of 2018 Allocation Policy Change on Recipient Mortality and Morbidity by Race and Ethnicity.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Alisa Pugacheva, Selena S Li, S Alireza Rabi, Thais Faggion Vinholo, Eriberto Michel, Ruby Singh, Asishana A Osho
{"title":"Heart Transplant Equity: Effect of 2018 Allocation Policy Change on Recipient Mortality and Morbidity by Race and Ethnicity.","authors":"Alisa Pugacheva, Selena S Li, S Alireza Rabi, Thais Faggion Vinholo, Eriberto Michel, Ruby Singh, Asishana A Osho","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2018, the US heart allocation policy was changed from 3-tiers to 6-tiers for a more granular assessment of patients' medical urgency. Given previous studies showing significant discrepancies in post-transplant outcomes among Black and Hispanic minority groups, we investigated the effects of the allocation policy change on these groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult heart transplant patients from 10/18/2014-10/18/2022 were included from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Multiorgan transplants and retransplants were excluded. 1:1 propensity-matching were performed by race/ethnicity and allocation score era. Primary outcome was overall(4-year) survival assessed using multivariable Cox regression in unmatched cohort; secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 1-year rejection, short-term mortality, and graft failure, assessed using conditional logistic regression in the matched cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cohort included 19,731 patients; 13,001 White, 4784 Black, and 1946 Hispanic. White, Black, and Hispanic cohorts in matched analysis demonstrated post-allocation change improvements in in-hospital and 1-year rejection (all p<0.05) and comparable short-term mortality and graft failure (all p>0.05). In adjusted analyses, Black recipients had comparable overall mortality to White recipients both pre- (aHR=1.04[0.92,1.18], p=0.514) and post-allocation change (aHR=1.10[0.95,1.27], p=0.194). Post-allocation change, Black recipients had a higher risk of overall mortality (aHR=1.20[1.01,1.42], p=0.033) while Hispanic recipients had lower risk of mortality (aHR=0.72[0.55,0.94], p=0.015) compared to White recipients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis demonstrates improved acute rejection rates post allocation change, by race/ethnicities however, there remain disparities in short and long-term recipient mortality for Black recipients in the post-allocation change era. Future studies will explore the factors impacting long-term survival among these groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001374","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2018, the US heart allocation policy was changed from 3-tiers to 6-tiers for a more granular assessment of patients' medical urgency. Given previous studies showing significant discrepancies in post-transplant outcomes among Black and Hispanic minority groups, we investigated the effects of the allocation policy change on these groups.

Methods: Adult heart transplant patients from 10/18/2014-10/18/2022 were included from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Multiorgan transplants and retransplants were excluded. 1:1 propensity-matching were performed by race/ethnicity and allocation score era. Primary outcome was overall(4-year) survival assessed using multivariable Cox regression in unmatched cohort; secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 1-year rejection, short-term mortality, and graft failure, assessed using conditional logistic regression in the matched cohort.

Results: The total cohort included 19,731 patients; 13,001 White, 4784 Black, and 1946 Hispanic. White, Black, and Hispanic cohorts in matched analysis demonstrated post-allocation change improvements in in-hospital and 1-year rejection (all p<0.05) and comparable short-term mortality and graft failure (all p>0.05). In adjusted analyses, Black recipients had comparable overall mortality to White recipients both pre- (aHR=1.04[0.92,1.18], p=0.514) and post-allocation change (aHR=1.10[0.95,1.27], p=0.194). Post-allocation change, Black recipients had a higher risk of overall mortality (aHR=1.20[1.01,1.42], p=0.033) while Hispanic recipients had lower risk of mortality (aHR=0.72[0.55,0.94], p=0.015) compared to White recipients.

Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates improved acute rejection rates post allocation change, by race/ethnicities however, there remain disparities in short and long-term recipient mortality for Black recipients in the post-allocation change era. Future studies will explore the factors impacting long-term survival among these groups.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信