Proactive inpatient diabetes service model of care observed to decrease severe hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia in a 'real-world' Australian hospital setting.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Karen Van, Xiao Wei Ma, Julie Loughran, Alexandra Brown, Sarah Lindsey, Henry Wong, Spiros Fourlanos, Suresh Varadarajan, Mervyn Kyi
{"title":"Proactive inpatient diabetes service model of care observed to decrease severe hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia in a 'real-world' Australian hospital setting.","authors":"Karen Van, Xiao Wei Ma, Julie Loughran, Alexandra Brown, Sarah Lindsey, Henry Wong, Spiros Fourlanos, Suresh Varadarajan, Mervyn Kyi","doi":"10.1111/imj.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia are associated with adverse outcomes in hospitalised patients. A cluster-randomised trial at an Australian quaternary hospital showed that an early intervention model of inpatient diabetes care decreased hyperglycaemia. This model of care was later implemented as a clinical service at Northern Health, where the inpatient diabetes service (IDS) performed virtual glycaemic surveillance and provided proactive bedside consultations for patients with unstable glycaemia.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess glycaemic and clinical outcomes of this IDS model of care in a real-world hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared hospital-wide cross-sectional cohorts of all inpatients with diabetes identified on two census days: in November 2017 (pre-IDS implementation) and in March 2021 (with IDS care in place). Bedside diabetes consultations, capillary glucose measurements and glycaemic treatment plans were compared. Standard glucometric analyses were performed on capillary glucose measurements to assess the incidence of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proactive IDS model significantly increased bedside consultations by the diabetes team (6% pre-IDS vs 47% with IDS care) and increased inpatient insulin prescribing. Compared to the pre-IDS group (n = 126), the IDS group (n = 139) had a lower incidence of severe hyperglycaemia (patient-days with mean glucose >15 mmol/L: 6.5% vs 4.5%, P = 0.03) and level 2 hypoglycaemia (patient-days with glucose <3 mmol/L: 1.1% vs 0.2%, P = 0.01). In patients younger than 75 years with admission HbA1c >7.0%, more patients had diabetes treatment intensification at hospital discharge with IDS care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following implementation of a proactive IDS model of care, a lower incidence of severe hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia are associated with adverse outcomes in hospitalised patients. A cluster-randomised trial at an Australian quaternary hospital showed that an early intervention model of inpatient diabetes care decreased hyperglycaemia. This model of care was later implemented as a clinical service at Northern Health, where the inpatient diabetes service (IDS) performed virtual glycaemic surveillance and provided proactive bedside consultations for patients with unstable glycaemia.

Aims: To assess glycaemic and clinical outcomes of this IDS model of care in a real-world hospital setting.

Methods: We compared hospital-wide cross-sectional cohorts of all inpatients with diabetes identified on two census days: in November 2017 (pre-IDS implementation) and in March 2021 (with IDS care in place). Bedside diabetes consultations, capillary glucose measurements and glycaemic treatment plans were compared. Standard glucometric analyses were performed on capillary glucose measurements to assess the incidence of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia.

Results: The proactive IDS model significantly increased bedside consultations by the diabetes team (6% pre-IDS vs 47% with IDS care) and increased inpatient insulin prescribing. Compared to the pre-IDS group (n = 126), the IDS group (n = 139) had a lower incidence of severe hyperglycaemia (patient-days with mean glucose >15 mmol/L: 6.5% vs 4.5%, P = 0.03) and level 2 hypoglycaemia (patient-days with glucose <3 mmol/L: 1.1% vs 0.2%, P = 0.01). In patients younger than 75 years with admission HbA1c >7.0%, more patients had diabetes treatment intensification at hospital discharge with IDS care.

Conclusions: Following implementation of a proactive IDS model of care, a lower incidence of severe hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia was observed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信