Prediction of Clinical Response of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder Using Hyperdimensional Computing.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Lulu Ge, Aaron N McInnes, Alik S Widge, Keshab K Parhi
{"title":"Prediction of Clinical Response of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder Using Hyperdimensional Computing.","authors":"Lulu Ge, Aaron N McInnes, Alik S Widge, Keshab K Parhi","doi":"10.1109/JBHI.2025.3537757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive control dysregulation is nearly universal across disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD). Achieving comparable response rates to medication, the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mechanism and its effect on cognitive control have not been well understood yet. This paper investigates the predictive capability of the clinical response to TMS treatment using 34 cognitive variables measured from TMS treatment of 22 MDD subjects over an eight-week period. We employ a novel brain-inspired computing paradigm, hyperdimensional computing (HDC), to classify the effectiveness of TMS using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation (LOSOCV). Four performance metrics-accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC-are used, with AUC being the primary metric. Experimental results reveal that: i). Although SVM outperforms HDC in terms of accuracy, HDC achieves an AUC of 0.82, surpassing SVM by 0.07. ii). The optimal performance for both classifiers is obtained with feature selection using SelectKBest. iii) Among the top features selected by SelectKBest for the two classifiers, ws_MedRT (median rate for the Websurf task) shows a more distinguishable distribution between clinical responses (\"1\") and no clinical responses (\"0\"). In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of HDC for predicting clinical responses to TMS and underscore the importance of feature selection in improving classification performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":13073,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3537757","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive control dysregulation is nearly universal across disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD). Achieving comparable response rates to medication, the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mechanism and its effect on cognitive control have not been well understood yet. This paper investigates the predictive capability of the clinical response to TMS treatment using 34 cognitive variables measured from TMS treatment of 22 MDD subjects over an eight-week period. We employ a novel brain-inspired computing paradigm, hyperdimensional computing (HDC), to classify the effectiveness of TMS using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation (LOSOCV). Four performance metrics-accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC-are used, with AUC being the primary metric. Experimental results reveal that: i). Although SVM outperforms HDC in terms of accuracy, HDC achieves an AUC of 0.82, surpassing SVM by 0.07. ii). The optimal performance for both classifiers is obtained with feature selection using SelectKBest. iii) Among the top features selected by SelectKBest for the two classifiers, ws_MedRT (median rate for the Websurf task) shows a more distinguishable distribution between clinical responses ("1") and no clinical responses ("0"). In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of HDC for predicting clinical responses to TMS and underscore the importance of feature selection in improving classification performance.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1151
期刊介绍: IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics publishes original papers presenting recent advances where information and communication technologies intersect with health, healthcare, life sciences, and biomedicine. Topics include acquisition, transmission, storage, retrieval, management, and analysis of biomedical and health information. The journal covers applications of information technologies in healthcare, patient monitoring, preventive care, early disease diagnosis, therapy discovery, and personalized treatment protocols. It explores electronic medical and health records, clinical information systems, decision support systems, medical and biological imaging informatics, wearable systems, body area/sensor networks, and more. Integration-related topics like interoperability, evidence-based medicine, and secure patient data are also addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信