When the Structural, Social, and Biological Domains Converge: The Case of Neighborhood Ethnic Density and Psychosis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Deidre M Anglin, Alexandria T Selloni
{"title":"When the Structural, Social, and Biological Domains Converge: The Case of Neighborhood Ethnic Density and Psychosis.","authors":"Deidre M Anglin, Alexandria T Selloni","doi":"10.1097/HRP.0000000000000420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Biological mechanisms associated with psychosis risk are often formed by generations of social-environmental experiences within families, communities, and neighborhoods, and further shaped by structural policies. This column first describes conceptual work that integrates macrolevel structural, individual-level social, and biological domains to better understand psychosis risk. It then highlights the interconnection of low neighborhood ethnic density and racial exclusion as an example of how social determinants connect to social and biological consequences associated with psychosis outcomes. Neighborhood ethnoracial diversity may be protective against social and biological mechanisms connected to psychosis outcomes among minoritized groups at risk for psychosis. This is particularly salient during childhood because such diversity attenuates stress processes associated with social exclusion and discrimination. Moreover, ethnoracially diverse communities foster close relationships and social connection. We provide supportive literature to illustrate the importance of multilevel/multifactorial approaches for identifying psychosis risk and protective factors. Investing further in integrative approaches for understanding psychosis risk and prognosis may translate into more substantial improvements for individuals with these lived experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":12915,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","volume":"33 2","pages":"78-82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000420","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Biological mechanisms associated with psychosis risk are often formed by generations of social-environmental experiences within families, communities, and neighborhoods, and further shaped by structural policies. This column first describes conceptual work that integrates macrolevel structural, individual-level social, and biological domains to better understand psychosis risk. It then highlights the interconnection of low neighborhood ethnic density and racial exclusion as an example of how social determinants connect to social and biological consequences associated with psychosis outcomes. Neighborhood ethnoracial diversity may be protective against social and biological mechanisms connected to psychosis outcomes among minoritized groups at risk for psychosis. This is particularly salient during childhood because such diversity attenuates stress processes associated with social exclusion and discrimination. Moreover, ethnoracially diverse communities foster close relationships and social connection. We provide supportive literature to illustrate the importance of multilevel/multifactorial approaches for identifying psychosis risk and protective factors. Investing further in integrative approaches for understanding psychosis risk and prognosis may translate into more substantial improvements for individuals with these lived experiences.

当结构、社会和生物领域趋于一致时:邻里种族密度与精神病》。
与精神病风险相关的生物学机制通常是由家庭、社区和邻里几代人的社会环境经验形成的,并进一步受到结构性政策的影响。本专栏首先描述了整合宏观层面结构、个人层面社会和生物领域的概念性工作,以更好地理解精神病风险。然后,它强调了低社区种族密度和种族排斥之间的相互联系,作为社会决定因素如何与与精神病结果相关的社会和生物后果联系起来的一个例子。社区种族多样性可能对与精神病风险少数群体的精神病结果相关的社会和生物机制具有保护作用。这在儿童时期尤为突出,因为这种多样性减轻了与社会排斥和歧视有关的压力过程。此外,多民族社区促进了密切的关系和社会联系。我们提供支持性文献来说明多层次/多因素方法对识别精神病风险和保护因素的重要性。进一步投资于了解精神病风险和预后的综合方法,可能会为有这些生活经历的个体带来更实质性的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Harvard Review of Psychiatry is the authoritative source for scholarly reviews and perspectives on important topics in psychiatry. Founded by the Harvard Medical School''s Department of Psychiatry, the Harvard Review of Psychiatry features review papers that summarize and synthesize the key literature in a scholarly and clinically relevant manner. Topics covered include: Schizophrenia and related disorders; Mood disorders; Personality disorders; Substance use disorders; Anxiety; Neuroscience; Psychosocial aspects of psychiatry; Ethics; Psychiatric education; and much more. In addition, a Clinical Challenges section presents a case with discussion from a panel of experts. Brief reviews are presented in topic-specific columns that include Cross-Cultural Psychiatry, History of Psychiatry, Ethics, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信