An Exploratory Comparison of Attitudes toward Stuttering and Cluttering of Chinese Practicing Speech and Language Therapists and SLT Students.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Yu-An Chen, Shoko Miyamoto, Kenneth O St Louis, Yao Liu, Haotian Liu, Ting Gong, Ying Yang, Sirui Liu
{"title":"An Exploratory Comparison of Attitudes toward Stuttering and Cluttering of Chinese Practicing Speech and Language Therapists and SLT Students.","authors":"Yu-An Chen, Shoko Miyamoto, Kenneth O St Louis, Yao Liu, Haotian Liu, Ting Gong, Ying Yang, Sirui Liu","doi":"10.1159/000543442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare attitudes toward stuttering and cluttering among speech and language therapists (SLTs) and speech and language therapy students in China and how they differ from those in other countries. It also seeks to explore factors that may influence these attitude differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized online versions of the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering (POSHA-S) and Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Cluttering (POSHA-Cl) instruments to conduct surveys of 54 SLTs and 99 SLT students at 6 Chinese universities offering speech and language therapy programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chinese SLTs had more positive attitudes than did SLT students. For example, rejecting learning and emotional trauma as a cause of stuttering or cluttering (a positive response) was more likely in SLTs than in SLT students. Both groups expressed more positivity about their knowledge sources than the average ratings from international samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased positive exposure opportunities with stuttering or cluttering will likely positively impact on attitudes toward stuttering and cluttering in China. It is crucial for speech and language professionals in China to recognize the widespread misinformation in various sources and actively combat misconceptions about stuttering and cluttering.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to compare attitudes toward stuttering and cluttering among speech and language therapists (SLTs) and speech and language therapy students in China and how they differ from those in other countries. It also seeks to explore factors that may influence these attitude differences.

Methods: We utilized online versions of the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering (POSHA-S) and Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Cluttering (POSHA-Cl) instruments to conduct surveys of 54 SLTs and 99 SLT students at 6 Chinese universities offering speech and language therapy programs.

Results: Chinese SLTs had more positive attitudes than did SLT students. For example, rejecting learning and emotional trauma as a cause of stuttering or cluttering (a positive response) was more likely in SLTs than in SLT students. Both groups expressed more positivity about their knowledge sources than the average ratings from international samples.

Conclusion: Increased positive exposure opportunities with stuttering or cluttering will likely positively impact on attitudes toward stuttering and cluttering in China. It is crucial for speech and language professionals in China to recognize the widespread misinformation in various sources and actively combat misconceptions about stuttering and cluttering.

汉语执业语言治疗师与学生对口吃和杂乱态度的探索性比较
本研究旨在比较中国语言治疗师和语言治疗学生对口吃和混乱的态度,以及他们与其他国家的差异。它还试图探索可能影响这些态度差异的因素。本研究利用在线版的“人的口吃属性民意调查”(POSHA-S)和“人的杂乱属性民意调查”(POSHA-Cl)工具,对中国六所提供语言治疗课程的大学的54名语言教师和99名语言教师学生进行了调查。汉语外语教师的积极态度高于外语学生。例如,拒绝学习和情感创伤作为口吃或混乱的原因(一种积极的反应)在特殊语言交际者中比在特殊语言交际学生中更可能出现。与国际样本的平均评分相比,这两组人对自己的知识来源都表达了更积极的态度。增加对口吃或乱的积极接触机会可能会对中国对口吃和乱的态度产生积极影响。对于中国的演讲和语言专业人士来说,认识到各种来源普遍存在的错误信息并积极消除对口吃和混乱的误解是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1947, ''Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica'' provides a forum for international research on the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of structures of the speech, language, and hearing mechanisms. Original papers published in this journal report new findings on basic function, assessment, management, and test development in communication sciences and disorders, as well as experiments designed to test specific theories of speech, language, and hearing function. Review papers of high quality are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信