Yu-An Chen, Shoko Miyamoto, Kenneth O St Louis, Yao Liu, Haotian Liu, Ting Gong, Ying Yang, Sirui Liu
{"title":"An Exploratory Comparison of Attitudes toward Stuttering and Cluttering of Chinese Practicing Speech and Language Therapists and SLT Students.","authors":"Yu-An Chen, Shoko Miyamoto, Kenneth O St Louis, Yao Liu, Haotian Liu, Ting Gong, Ying Yang, Sirui Liu","doi":"10.1159/000543442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare attitudes toward stuttering and cluttering among speech and language therapists (SLTs) and speech and language therapy students in China and how they differ from those in other countries. It also seeks to explore factors that may influence these attitude differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized online versions of the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering (POSHA-S) and Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Cluttering (POSHA-Cl) instruments to conduct surveys of 54 SLTs and 99 SLT students at 6 Chinese universities offering speech and language therapy programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chinese SLTs had more positive attitudes than did SLT students. For example, rejecting learning and emotional trauma as a cause of stuttering or cluttering (a positive response) was more likely in SLTs than in SLT students. Both groups expressed more positivity about their knowledge sources than the average ratings from international samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased positive exposure opportunities with stuttering or cluttering will likely positively impact on attitudes toward stuttering and cluttering in China. It is crucial for speech and language professionals in China to recognize the widespread misinformation in various sources and actively combat misconceptions about stuttering and cluttering.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to compare attitudes toward stuttering and cluttering among speech and language therapists (SLTs) and speech and language therapy students in China and how they differ from those in other countries. It also seeks to explore factors that may influence these attitude differences.
Methods: We utilized online versions of the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering (POSHA-S) and Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Cluttering (POSHA-Cl) instruments to conduct surveys of 54 SLTs and 99 SLT students at 6 Chinese universities offering speech and language therapy programs.
Results: Chinese SLTs had more positive attitudes than did SLT students. For example, rejecting learning and emotional trauma as a cause of stuttering or cluttering (a positive response) was more likely in SLTs than in SLT students. Both groups expressed more positivity about their knowledge sources than the average ratings from international samples.
Conclusion: Increased positive exposure opportunities with stuttering or cluttering will likely positively impact on attitudes toward stuttering and cluttering in China. It is crucial for speech and language professionals in China to recognize the widespread misinformation in various sources and actively combat misconceptions about stuttering and cluttering.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1947, ''Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica'' provides a forum for international research on the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of structures of the speech, language, and hearing mechanisms. Original papers published in this journal report new findings on basic function, assessment, management, and test development in communication sciences and disorders, as well as experiments designed to test specific theories of speech, language, and hearing function. Review papers of high quality are also welcomed.