Addressing the long-term risks of administering antenatal steroids.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sean W D Carter, Agnihotri Biswas, Hannah R S Watson, Han Lin Chelsea Ip, Erin L Fee, Kay Yi Michelle Seah, Yusaku Kumagai, Zubair Amin, Mahesh A Choolani, Alan H Jobe, Sebastian E Illanes, Matthew W Kemp
{"title":"Addressing the long-term risks of administering antenatal steroids.","authors":"Sean W D Carter, Agnihotri Biswas, Hannah R S Watson, Han Lin Chelsea Ip, Erin L Fee, Kay Yi Michelle Seah, Yusaku Kumagai, Zubair Amin, Mahesh A Choolani, Alan H Jobe, Sebastian E Illanes, Matthew W Kemp","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2025.2475190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A single course of antenatal steroid (ANS) therapy is standard of care for women at risk of preterm birth, reducing the risk of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal morbidity, and mortality. An unresolved challenge relates to the potential risk of adverse long-term effects, and how these risks might be balanced with therapeutic benefit.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We outline key concepts in glucocorticoid signaling, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and clinical use before presenting data on the potential long-term harms of ANS therapy.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Our assessment is that: i) Currently used, high dose ANS regimens can induce multi-system changes in the fetus that alter growth and development, potentially increasing long-term disease risk; and ii) relative risks likely increase proportionally to the magnitude and duration of steroid exposure, in late preterm and term ANS use, and in off-target treatments. A single course of ANS therapy to at risk women between 24- and 34-weeks' gestation is well justified. Efforts should be made to improve dosing and patient selection. At periviable gestations, the high immediate risk of serious disease or death justifies modest long-term risks. At late preterm and term gestations, where steroids do not provide notable survival or health benefits, supporting routine ANS use is more difficult.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2025.2475190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A single course of antenatal steroid (ANS) therapy is standard of care for women at risk of preterm birth, reducing the risk of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal morbidity, and mortality. An unresolved challenge relates to the potential risk of adverse long-term effects, and how these risks might be balanced with therapeutic benefit.

Areas covered: We outline key concepts in glucocorticoid signaling, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and clinical use before presenting data on the potential long-term harms of ANS therapy.

Expert opinion: Our assessment is that: i) Currently used, high dose ANS regimens can induce multi-system changes in the fetus that alter growth and development, potentially increasing long-term disease risk; and ii) relative risks likely increase proportionally to the magnitude and duration of steroid exposure, in late preterm and term ANS use, and in off-target treatments. A single course of ANS therapy to at risk women between 24- and 34-weeks' gestation is well justified. Efforts should be made to improve dosing and patient selection. At periviable gestations, the high immediate risk of serious disease or death justifies modest long-term risks. At late preterm and term gestations, where steroids do not provide notable survival or health benefits, supporting routine ANS use is more difficult.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信