Measuring the WHO Global Breast Cancer Initiative Pillars' key performance indicators in Sub-Saharan Africa: experience in the African Breast Cancer-Disparities in Outcomes hospital-based cohort study.
Pauline Boucheron, Annelle Zietsman, Angelica Anele, Awa U Offiah, Moses Galukande, Groesbeck Parham, Leeya Pinder, Tingting Mo, Milena Foerster, Joachim Schüz, Benjamin O Anderson, Mary Nyangasi, Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva, Valerie McCormack
{"title":"Measuring the WHO Global Breast Cancer Initiative Pillars' key performance indicators in Sub-Saharan Africa: experience in the African Breast Cancer-Disparities in Outcomes hospital-based cohort study.","authors":"Pauline Boucheron, Annelle Zietsman, Angelica Anele, Awa U Offiah, Moses Galukande, Groesbeck Parham, Leeya Pinder, Tingting Mo, Milena Foerster, Joachim Schüz, Benjamin O Anderson, Mary Nyangasi, Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva, Valerie McCormack","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization Global Breast Cancer Initiative aims to reduce breast cancer (BC) mortality through three pillars, whose key performance indicators (KPIs) and benchmarks are: (KPI-1) ≥60% BC diagnosed at early stage (I/II), (KPI-2) all suspected BC diagnosed ≤60 days from health system presentation, and (KPI-3) ≥80% of BC patients completing recommended treatment. We aimed to inform measurement of these KPIs in the context of a multi-country hospital-based study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all women who participated to the African Breast Cancer-Disparities in Outcomes (ABC-DO) prospective cohort study (excluding South Africa), recruited between 2014 and 2017, across five population-race groups spanning low to high survival: Nigeria, Uganda, Zambia, Namibian black and Namibian non-black women. Follow-up was up to five years post-diagnosis. For each KPI, we reported challenges, assumptions and consistencies in measuring them; completeness and group-level estimations of each KPI were assessed using descriptive analyses. To evaluate their discriminatory ability, we assessed group-level correlations between KPI estimates and five-year net survival.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>KPI-1 was extracted from study or medical records for 1389/1473 (94%). KPI-2 relied upon the woman's recall of her date of first contact with the healthcare system and a pathology date, both of which were available for 1222/1473 (83%) but inconsistent for 114/1222 (9.3%). KPI-3, estimated using dates of receipt of multiple therapies from medical records and patient interviews over 12 months, was estimated for 1129/1188 (95%), but uncertain in 113/1129 (10%). For each population group, KPIs achievements were similar for KPI-1 and KPI-2, at 22-49%, and lowest for KPI-3 (<30%). Highest KPIs values were observed in Namibian non-black women who had the highest survival.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Data collection systems specifically set up for prospective hospital-based studies can be used to collect the necessary data to measure these three GBCI KPIs.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Cancer Institute (United States).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"103104"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103104","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization Global Breast Cancer Initiative aims to reduce breast cancer (BC) mortality through three pillars, whose key performance indicators (KPIs) and benchmarks are: (KPI-1) ≥60% BC diagnosed at early stage (I/II), (KPI-2) all suspected BC diagnosed ≤60 days from health system presentation, and (KPI-3) ≥80% of BC patients completing recommended treatment. We aimed to inform measurement of these KPIs in the context of a multi-country hospital-based study.
Methods: We included all women who participated to the African Breast Cancer-Disparities in Outcomes (ABC-DO) prospective cohort study (excluding South Africa), recruited between 2014 and 2017, across five population-race groups spanning low to high survival: Nigeria, Uganda, Zambia, Namibian black and Namibian non-black women. Follow-up was up to five years post-diagnosis. For each KPI, we reported challenges, assumptions and consistencies in measuring them; completeness and group-level estimations of each KPI were assessed using descriptive analyses. To evaluate their discriminatory ability, we assessed group-level correlations between KPI estimates and five-year net survival.
Findings: KPI-1 was extracted from study or medical records for 1389/1473 (94%). KPI-2 relied upon the woman's recall of her date of first contact with the healthcare system and a pathology date, both of which were available for 1222/1473 (83%) but inconsistent for 114/1222 (9.3%). KPI-3, estimated using dates of receipt of multiple therapies from medical records and patient interviews over 12 months, was estimated for 1129/1188 (95%), but uncertain in 113/1129 (10%). For each population group, KPIs achievements were similar for KPI-1 and KPI-2, at 22-49%, and lowest for KPI-3 (<30%). Highest KPIs values were observed in Namibian non-black women who had the highest survival.
Interpretation: Data collection systems specifically set up for prospective hospital-based studies can be used to collect the necessary data to measure these three GBCI KPIs.
Funding: National Cancer Institute (United States).
期刊介绍：
eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
