Clinical and radiographic predictive factors for the favorable outcome of lumbar epidural steroid injection in lumbosacral radiculopathy: a prospective analytical study from Thailand.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Asian Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.31616/asj.2024.0412
Pornpan Chalermkitpanit, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Weerasak Singhatanadgige, Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Patt Pannangpetch, Sittisak Honsawek
{"title":"Clinical and radiographic predictive factors for the favorable outcome of lumbar epidural steroid injection in lumbosacral radiculopathy: a prospective analytical study from Thailand.","authors":"Pornpan Chalermkitpanit, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Weerasak Singhatanadgige, Teerachat Tanasansomboon, Patt Pannangpetch, Sittisak Honsawek","doi":"10.31616/asj.2024.0412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective analytic study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the clinical factors and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings that can predict a favorable outcome following transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>The efficacy of lumbar epidural steroid injection varies, and no clinical parameters have been established to predict a favorable response to TFESI reliably.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 120 patients diagnosed with lumbosacral radiculopathy underwent TFESI. At each index spinal level, 5.0 mg of a dexamethasone mixture in 2.0% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine was injected. At the 2-week follow-up, a favorable response to TFESI was defined as pain reduction upon movement of >50.0%. Pain manifestation and MRI findings were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A favorable response was observed in 60.8% of the patients 2 weeks post-TFESI. In the multivariate analysis, patients with mild central canal stenosis had 4.8 times higher odds of a favorable response to TFESI than those with severe central canal stenosis (adjusted odds ratio, 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-18.8; p =0.023). Favorable responders experienced a notable 29-week period of pain reduction (95% CI, 10.3-47.8), along with a significantly lower incidence of surgery at 12 months (13.7%) (p <0.01). The mean pain score differences of 3.5 out of 10 observed 2 weeks and 1 month post-TFESI represented the optimal sensitivity and specificity in forecasting favorable responder status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A pain reduction of 3.5 out of 10 within 1 month is considered a clinical benchmark for predicting long-term positive outcomes after TFESI. The presence of severe central canal stenosis is significantly associated with an unfavorable response to TFESI.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"422-431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12242257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A prospective analytic study.

Purpose: To investigate the clinical factors and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings that can predict a favorable outcome following transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Overview of literature: The efficacy of lumbar epidural steroid injection varies, and no clinical parameters have been established to predict a favorable response to TFESI reliably.

Methods: In total, 120 patients diagnosed with lumbosacral radiculopathy underwent TFESI. At each index spinal level, 5.0 mg of a dexamethasone mixture in 2.0% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine was injected. At the 2-week follow-up, a favorable response to TFESI was defined as pain reduction upon movement of >50.0%. Pain manifestation and MRI findings were evaluated.

Results: A favorable response was observed in 60.8% of the patients 2 weeks post-TFESI. In the multivariate analysis, patients with mild central canal stenosis had 4.8 times higher odds of a favorable response to TFESI than those with severe central canal stenosis (adjusted odds ratio, 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-18.8; p =0.023). Favorable responders experienced a notable 29-week period of pain reduction (95% CI, 10.3-47.8), along with a significantly lower incidence of surgery at 12 months (13.7%) (p <0.01). The mean pain score differences of 3.5 out of 10 observed 2 weeks and 1 month post-TFESI represented the optimal sensitivity and specificity in forecasting favorable responder status.

Conclusions: A pain reduction of 3.5 out of 10 within 1 month is considered a clinical benchmark for predicting long-term positive outcomes after TFESI. The presence of severe central canal stenosis is significantly associated with an unfavorable response to TFESI.

腰椎硬膜外类固醇注射治疗腰骶神经根病的临床和影像学预测因素:泰国的一项前瞻性分析研究。
研究设计:前瞻性分析研究。目的:探讨腰骶神经根病患者经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射(TFESI)后的临床因素和磁共振成像(MRI)结果。文献综述:腰椎硬膜外类固醇注射的疗效各不相同,目前还没有建立临床参数来可靠地预测对TFESI的良好反应。方法:对120例诊断为腰骶神经根病的患者行TFESI治疗。在每个脊柱指数水平处注射含2.0%利多卡因和0.5%布比卡因的地塞米松混合物5.0 mg。在2周的随访中,对TFESI的良好反应被定义为运动后疼痛减轻50.0%。评估疼痛表现和MRI表现。结果:60.8%的患者在tfesi后2周有良好的反应。在多因素分析中,轻度中枢管狭窄患者对TFESI的有利反应几率是严重中枢管狭窄患者的4.8倍(调整后的优势比为4.8;95%置信区间[CI], 1.2-18.8;p = 0.023)。良好应答者经历了显著的29周疼痛减轻期(95% CI, 10.3-47.8),并且在12个月时手术发生率显著降低(13.7%)(p)。结论:1个月内疼痛减轻3.5分(满分10分)被认为是预测TFESI后长期积极结果的临床基准。严重的中央管狭窄与TFESI的不良反应显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信