A 20-year case-series of distal intestinal obstruction syndrome at a state-wide cystic fibrosis service.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Chen Lew, Chelsea Lin, Matthew Lukies, Peter Wark, Sarah Birks, Maria K Vanguardia, Satish Warrier
{"title":"A 20-year case-series of distal intestinal obstruction syndrome at a state-wide cystic fibrosis service.","authors":"Chen Lew, Chelsea Lin, Matthew Lukies, Peter Wark, Sarah Birks, Maria K Vanguardia, Satish Warrier","doi":"10.1111/ans.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal intestinal obstruction syndrome (DIOS) presents significant management challenges for people with cystic fibrosis (pwC). We evaluated the treatment outcomes and identified risk factors associated with the need for surgical intervention in patients admitted with DIOS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case series of 96 encounters of DIOS over a 20-year period, observing outcomes between cases of medical management versus those requiring for operative intervention. To our knowledge, this is the largest Australian study to review intervention in DIOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the patients studied, 94.8% were successfully treated non-surgically. Using computed tomography (CT) confirmation of DIOS as the gold standard, only 9.1% of abdominal x-rays were accurate in finding DIOS. Gastrografin was used in half of cases and was associated with a shorter recovery time. One in 16 patients required operative management, with two cases experiencing surgery following prolonged medical treatment. A history of previous laparotomy increased the odds of requiring surgical intervention by 16 times (95% CI: 1.2-209.9, P = 0.035), while a history of meconium ileus increased the odds by 15.6 times (95% CI: 1.2-204.8, P = 0.036). All patients who underwent surgery also had pancreatic insufficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medical management was successful in the majority of DIOS presentations. Our study emphasizes a low threshold for abdominal CT scans to identify complete DIOS in high-risk patients, particularly those with a history of laparotomy or meconium ileus, who may require surgical intervention. Furthermore, we advocate for the adjunctive use of Gastrografin alongside medical management. Future research should refine protocols for these high-risk groups to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Distal intestinal obstruction syndrome (DIOS) presents significant management challenges for people with cystic fibrosis (pwC). We evaluated the treatment outcomes and identified risk factors associated with the need for surgical intervention in patients admitted with DIOS.

Method: We conducted a retrospective case series of 96 encounters of DIOS over a 20-year period, observing outcomes between cases of medical management versus those requiring for operative intervention. To our knowledge, this is the largest Australian study to review intervention in DIOS.

Results: Among the patients studied, 94.8% were successfully treated non-surgically. Using computed tomography (CT) confirmation of DIOS as the gold standard, only 9.1% of abdominal x-rays were accurate in finding DIOS. Gastrografin was used in half of cases and was associated with a shorter recovery time. One in 16 patients required operative management, with two cases experiencing surgery following prolonged medical treatment. A history of previous laparotomy increased the odds of requiring surgical intervention by 16 times (95% CI: 1.2-209.9, P = 0.035), while a history of meconium ileus increased the odds by 15.6 times (95% CI: 1.2-204.8, P = 0.036). All patients who underwent surgery also had pancreatic insufficiency.

Conclusion: Medical management was successful in the majority of DIOS presentations. Our study emphasizes a low threshold for abdominal CT scans to identify complete DIOS in high-risk patients, particularly those with a history of laparotomy or meconium ileus, who may require surgical intervention. Furthermore, we advocate for the adjunctive use of Gastrografin alongside medical management. Future research should refine protocols for these high-risk groups to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity.

20年的病例系列远端肠梗阻综合征在全国范围内囊性纤维化服务。
背景:远端肠梗阻综合征(DIOS)对囊性纤维化(pwC)患者提出了重大的管理挑战。我们评估了治疗结果,并确定了与DIOS入院患者需要手术干预相关的危险因素。方法:我们对20年来96例DIOS病例进行了回顾性分析,观察了药物治疗与手术治疗的结果。据我们所知,这是澳大利亚对DIOS干预的最大研究。结果:94.8%的患者非手术治疗成功。以计算机断层扫描(CT)确认DIOS为金标准,腹部x线片发现DIOS的准确率仅为9.1%。一半的病例使用胃grafin,恢复时间较短。16例患者中有1例需要手术治疗,其中2例在长期药物治疗后进行了手术。既往剖腹手术史使需要手术干预的几率增加16倍(95% CI: 1.2-209.9, P = 0.035),而胎粪肠梗阻史使需要手术干预的几率增加15.6倍(95% CI: 1.2-204.8, P = 0.036)。所有接受手术的患者都有胰腺功能不全。结论:大多数DIOS患者的医疗管理是成功的。我们的研究强调在高危患者中,腹部CT扫描识别完全DIOS的低阈值,特别是那些有开腹手术史或胎粪肠梗阻的患者,他们可能需要手术干预。此外,我们提倡在医疗管理的同时辅助使用胃grafin。未来的研究应完善这些高危人群的方案,以改善结果并降低发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信