Pelvic ring ratio: a novel indicator of comprehensive pelvic alignment assessment.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Hiroaki Nakashima, Noriaki Kawakami, Sadayuki Ito, Naoki Segi, Jun Ouchida, Ippei Yamauchi, Tokumi Kanemura, Shiro Imagama
{"title":"Pelvic ring ratio: a novel indicator of comprehensive pelvic alignment assessment.","authors":"Hiroaki Nakashima, Noriaki Kawakami, Sadayuki Ito, Naoki Segi, Jun Ouchida, Ippei Yamauchi, Tokumi Kanemura, Shiro Imagama","doi":"10.31616/asj.2024.0447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of the pelvic ring ratio as an indicator for assessing pelvic tilt (PT) from the frontal view and explore its correlation with various whole-body sagittal alignment (WBSA) parameters using EOS imaging technology.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Traditional indicators of PT often rely on sagittal plane measurements, which can be challenging in cases of pelvic rotation or obesity. A new indicator such as the pelvic ring ratio could address these challenges and aid in the comprehensive assessment of pelvic alignment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 104 healthy participants (28 men, 76 women; mean age, 52.8±12.3 years) with no spinal disorders were recruited. Whole-body radiography using the EOS imaging system was performed to obtain sagittal and coronal parameters, including the pelvic ring ratio. Intra- and interobserver variability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on measurements by three spine surgery specialists. Correlation analyses among the pelvic ring ratio, age, body mass index, and WBSA parameters were conducted, and a multiple linear regression model was developed to predict PT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean pelvic ring ratio was 53.3%±11.5%. The intra- and interobserver ICCs were 0.89 and 0.87, respectively, indicating good reliability. The pelvic ring ratio was negatively correlated with age (r =-0.387, p <0.05) and PT (r =-0.598, p <0.05). The regression model revealed that the pelvic ring ratio and sex significantly predicted PT (p <0.05). Women had higher pelvic ring ratio (55.0%±11.3%) than men (48.6%±10.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pelvic ring ratio is a reliable and valuable indicator for PT assessment from the frontal view. It exhibits significant correlations with age and certain WBSA parameters, showing potential to improving the diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning for patients with spinal and hip disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A cross-sectional study.

Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of the pelvic ring ratio as an indicator for assessing pelvic tilt (PT) from the frontal view and explore its correlation with various whole-body sagittal alignment (WBSA) parameters using EOS imaging technology.

Overview of literature: Traditional indicators of PT often rely on sagittal plane measurements, which can be challenging in cases of pelvic rotation or obesity. A new indicator such as the pelvic ring ratio could address these challenges and aid in the comprehensive assessment of pelvic alignment.

Methods: In total, 104 healthy participants (28 men, 76 women; mean age, 52.8±12.3 years) with no spinal disorders were recruited. Whole-body radiography using the EOS imaging system was performed to obtain sagittal and coronal parameters, including the pelvic ring ratio. Intra- and interobserver variability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on measurements by three spine surgery specialists. Correlation analyses among the pelvic ring ratio, age, body mass index, and WBSA parameters were conducted, and a multiple linear regression model was developed to predict PT.

Results: The mean pelvic ring ratio was 53.3%±11.5%. The intra- and interobserver ICCs were 0.89 and 0.87, respectively, indicating good reliability. The pelvic ring ratio was negatively correlated with age (r =-0.387, p <0.05) and PT (r =-0.598, p <0.05). The regression model revealed that the pelvic ring ratio and sex significantly predicted PT (p <0.05). Women had higher pelvic ring ratio (55.0%±11.3%) than men (48.6%±10.8%).

Conclusions: The pelvic ring ratio is a reliable and valuable indicator for PT assessment from the frontal view. It exhibits significant correlations with age and certain WBSA parameters, showing potential to improving the diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning for patients with spinal and hip disorders.

盆腔环比:综合盆腔排列评估的新指标。
研究设计:横断面研究。目的:利用EOS成像技术,确定骨盆环比值作为骨盆正位倾斜(PT)评估指标的有效性,并探讨其与全身矢状对齐(WBSA)各项参数的相关性。文献综述:传统的PT指标通常依赖于矢状面测量,这在骨盆旋转或肥胖的情况下可能具有挑战性。一个新的指标,如盆腔环比可以解决这些挑战,并有助于盆腔对齐的综合评估。方法:共104例健康受试者(男性28例,女性76例;平均年龄(52.8±12.3岁),无脊柱疾病。采用EOS成像系统进行全身x线摄影,获得矢状面和冠状面参数,包括骨盆环比。使用基于三位脊柱外科专家测量的类内相关系数(ICCs)评估观察者内部和观察者之间的可变性。对骨盆环比与年龄、体重指数、WBSA参数进行相关性分析,建立多元线性回归模型预测pt。结果:骨盆环比平均值为53.3%±11.5%。观察者内部和观察者之间的ICCs分别为0.89和0.87,表明具有良好的信度。盆腔环比值与年龄呈负相关(r =-0.387, p)。结论:盆腔环比值是一项可靠、有价值的正位PT评价指标。它与年龄和某些WBSA参数显着相关,显示出提高脊柱和髋关节疾病患者诊断准确性和治疗计划的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信