Evaluation of patients on immunosuppressants undergoing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and duodenal switch: analysis of 19,414 patients.

Abstract

Background: Bariatric surgery is being offered to more medically complex patients, including patients on immunosuppressants, although outcomes after different bariatrics surgeries have not been studied in this population.

Objectives: We compared perioperative safety of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and duodenal switch (DS) in patients on immunosuppression.

Setting: National sample from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database.

Methods: The MBSAQIP database was queried from the years 2015 to 2021 for adult patients on chronic immunosuppression who underwent SG, RYGB, or DS. Revisional, open, endoscopic, or emergency surgeries were excluded, as were patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists class of 5 and patients without full 30-day follow-up. Propensity-score matching was performed with a 3:3:1 ratio (SG:RYGB:DS) controlling for surgical approach, sex, age, functional status, American Society of Anesthesiologists, body mass index, and comorbidities.

Results: There were 19,414 patients on immunosuppression who underwent SG (n = 14,358), RYGB (n = 4864), or DS (n = 192). After propensity-score matching , RYGB and DS had longer LOS (P < .01), greater global 30-day complication (P < .01), and 30-day reoperation rates (P = .048). Compared with SG and RYGB, DS had greater rates of patients requiring mechanical ventilation >48-hour postoperatively (P < .05). Compared with SG, DS had greater rates of renal insufficiency (P = .01), organ space infection (P = .01), unplanned intubation (P < .01), and unplanned intensive care unit admission (P < .01).

Conclusions: For patients on immunosuppression, SG carried the lowest complication and reoperation rates, whereas DS had overall complication rates in line with RYGB.