[Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments of melanoma].

IF 0.8
Joséphine Cazals de Fabel, Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste
{"title":"[Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments of melanoma].","authors":"Joséphine Cazals de Fabel, Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste","doi":"10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of melanoma has evolved significantly over the past decade with the advent of immunotherapies and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, which have changed the prognosis for patients with advanced disease. Having demonstrated their efficacy in advanced disease, these treatments have been evaluated and shown to be effective in adjuvant treatment at earlier stages, first in stage III and then in stage IIB-IIC. Alongside the development of these adjuvant treatments, which have become the standard of care, new therapeutic strategies have emerged. Neoadjuvant treatments have been shown to be superior to adjuvant treatments in phase II and III trials. These neoadjuvant strategies will undoubtedly become the new standard for patients with macroscopic lymph node disease. However, there are still many unanswered questions regarding the optimal treatment regimen. Should mono- or bi-immunotherapy be used? Can surgery be de-escalated? Is additional adjuvant treatment essential or can it be withheld in the event of a major pathological response? Should patients with BRAFV600 mutations switch to targeted therapies in the event of pathological non-response? Should we switch to targeted therapies in the event of pathological non-response in BRAFV600 mutant patients? Therapeutic strategies, which are becoming increasingly personalised, are evolving very rapidly, with a trend towards de-escalation. We still lack robust biomarkers for patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":93917,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin du cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin du cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.11.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The management of melanoma has evolved significantly over the past decade with the advent of immunotherapies and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, which have changed the prognosis for patients with advanced disease. Having demonstrated their efficacy in advanced disease, these treatments have been evaluated and shown to be effective in adjuvant treatment at earlier stages, first in stage III and then in stage IIB-IIC. Alongside the development of these adjuvant treatments, which have become the standard of care, new therapeutic strategies have emerged. Neoadjuvant treatments have been shown to be superior to adjuvant treatments in phase II and III trials. These neoadjuvant strategies will undoubtedly become the new standard for patients with macroscopic lymph node disease. However, there are still many unanswered questions regarding the optimal treatment regimen. Should mono- or bi-immunotherapy be used? Can surgery be de-escalated? Is additional adjuvant treatment essential or can it be withheld in the event of a major pathological response? Should patients with BRAFV600 mutations switch to targeted therapies in the event of pathological non-response? Should we switch to targeted therapies in the event of pathological non-response in BRAFV600 mutant patients? Therapeutic strategies, which are becoming increasingly personalised, are evolving very rapidly, with a trend towards de-escalation. We still lack robust biomarkers for patient selection.

[黑色素瘤的辅助和新辅助治疗]。
在过去的十年中,随着免疫疗法和BRAF/MEK抑制剂的出现,黑色素瘤的治疗发生了重大变化,改变了晚期疾病患者的预后。这些治疗方法已经证明了它们在晚期疾病中的疗效,并已被评估并显示在早期阶段(首先是III期,然后是IIB-IIC期)的辅助治疗中有效。随着这些辅助治疗的发展,已经成为标准的护理,新的治疗策略也出现了。在II期和III期试验中,新辅助治疗已被证明优于辅助治疗。这些新辅助策略无疑将成为宏观淋巴结疾病患者的新标准。然而,关于最佳治疗方案仍有许多未解之谜。应该使用单免疫疗法还是双免疫疗法?手术可以降级吗?是否需要额外的辅助治疗,或者在发生重大病理反应时可以不进行辅助治疗?BRAFV600突变患者是否应该在病理性无反应的情况下切换到靶向治疗?在BRAFV600突变患者出现病理性无反应的情况下,我们是否应该转向靶向治疗?治疗策略正变得越来越个性化,发展非常迅速,有降级的趋势。我们仍然缺乏可靠的生物标志物来选择患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信