Evaluation of Universal Screening for Substance Use Risk on a Labor and Delivery Unit in Rural Pennsylvania.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Mary R Habashy, Karena M Moran, Kelly Gallagher, Sandra Halbruner
{"title":"Evaluation of Universal Screening for Substance Use Risk on a Labor and Delivery Unit in Rural Pennsylvania.","authors":"Mary R Habashy, Karena M Moran, Kelly Gallagher, Sandra Halbruner","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2025.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate a newly implemented universal screening process for substance use on a labor and delivery (L&D) unit.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Focused program evaluation using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health.</p><p><strong>Setting/local problem: </strong>An L&D unit in a community hospital that was part of a larger health system located in rural Pennsylvania with higher than state average rates of perinatal substance and opioid use.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Women (n = 570) admitted to the L&D unit between July 2021 and July 2022 and the maternity care providers (i.e., nurses, certified nurse-midwives, and physicians; n = 22) on the L&D unit.</p><p><strong>Intervention/measurements: </strong>We analyzed screening rates; provider follow-up rates for at-risk screens; and staff perception of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Quick Screen and the modified Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (NIDA Quick Screen/ASSIST). We also collected staff feedback with open-ended questions in a survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The screening rate on the L&D unit during the study period was 89%. Maternity care providers ordered the appropriate follow-up on at-risk screens 88% of the time. Nurses and providers found the NIDA Quick Screen/ASSIST to be an acceptable, appropriate, and feasible screening tool for identifying substance use risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The screening rate on the L&D unit was greater than the health system goal of 80%, whereas the provider follow-up rate was less than the goal of 100%. In open-ended feedback, staff identified ways to streamline the screening process; improve nurse, provider, and patient education; and enhance patient follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2025.01.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a newly implemented universal screening process for substance use on a labor and delivery (L&D) unit.

Design: Focused program evaluation using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health.

Setting/local problem: An L&D unit in a community hospital that was part of a larger health system located in rural Pennsylvania with higher than state average rates of perinatal substance and opioid use.

Participants: Women (n = 570) admitted to the L&D unit between July 2021 and July 2022 and the maternity care providers (i.e., nurses, certified nurse-midwives, and physicians; n = 22) on the L&D unit.

Intervention/measurements: We analyzed screening rates; provider follow-up rates for at-risk screens; and staff perception of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Quick Screen and the modified Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (NIDA Quick Screen/ASSIST). We also collected staff feedback with open-ended questions in a survey.

Results: The screening rate on the L&D unit during the study period was 89%. Maternity care providers ordered the appropriate follow-up on at-risk screens 88% of the time. Nurses and providers found the NIDA Quick Screen/ASSIST to be an acceptable, appropriate, and feasible screening tool for identifying substance use risk.

Conclusion: The screening rate on the L&D unit was greater than the health system goal of 80%, whereas the provider follow-up rate was less than the goal of 100%. In open-ended feedback, staff identified ways to streamline the screening process; improve nurse, provider, and patient education; and enhance patient follow-up.

评估普遍筛选物质使用风险在劳动和分娩单位在宾夕法尼亚州农村。
目的:评价一个新实施的普遍筛选过程的物质使用在分娩(L&D)单位。设计:使用疾病控制和预防中心公共卫生项目评估框架进行重点项目评估。环境/当地问题:社区医院的L&D部门是位于宾夕法尼亚州农村的大型卫生系统的一部分,其围产期药物和阿片类药物使用率高于州平均水平。参与者:2021年7月至2022年7月期间入住L&D病房的妇女(n = 570)和产科护理提供者(即护士、认证护士助产士和医生;n = 22)在L&D单元上。干预/测量:我们分析了筛查率;高危筛查的提供者随访率;以及工作人员对国家药物滥用快速筛选研究所和改进的酒精、吸烟和物质介入筛选试验(NIDA快速筛选/ASSIST)的可接受性、适当性和可行性的看法。我们还在调查中收集了员工的开放式问题反馈。结果:研究期间L&D单元的筛查率为89%。产科护理提供者在88%的时间里要求对高危筛查进行适当的随访。护士和服务提供者发现NIDA快速筛选/辅助是一种可接受的,适当的,可行的筛选工具,用于识别物质使用风险。结论:L&D单位的筛查率大于卫生系统目标的80%,而提供者随访率低于卫生系统目标的100%。在开放式反馈中,工作人员确定了简化筛选过程的方法;加强对护士、医务人员和患者的教育;加强患者随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信