Die Bedeutung des Wahlrechts gesonderter Berufsabschlüsse in der generalistischen Pflegeausbildung aus Sicht von ausbildenden Akteuren und Auszubildenden – Ergebnisse aus der Begleitforschung im Mixed-Methods-Design

IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Elena Tsarouha , Daniel Großmann , Kristina Greißl , Antje Krause-Zenß , Bernd Reuschenbach , Markus Wochnik , Karin Reiber
{"title":"Die Bedeutung des Wahlrechts gesonderter Berufsabschlüsse in der generalistischen Pflegeausbildung aus Sicht von ausbildenden Akteuren und Auszubildenden – Ergebnisse aus der Begleitforschung im Mixed-Methods-Design","authors":"Elena Tsarouha ,&nbsp;Daniel Großmann ,&nbsp;Kristina Greißl ,&nbsp;Antje Krause-Zenß ,&nbsp;Bernd Reuschenbach ,&nbsp;Markus Wochnik ,&nbsp;Karin Reiber","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The new Nursing Professions Act has been in force in Germany since 2020. Since then, general nursing training has been implemented. The reform of nursing training was the subject of controversial debate beforehand. Concerns were raised about inadequate preparation for different care sectors and settings. As a result, it is possible to choose specialized vocational qualifications in addition to the general nurse training. The article addresses how trainees are currently trained to meet the requirements in nursing and whether specialized vocational qualifications are chosen.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The article presents the results of an accompanying scientific research project (2021–2024). In this mixed methods study, a convergent parallel design was applied. The article is based on 80 guideline-based interviews with vocational trainers. Additionally, trainees were surveyed online in a longitudinal cohort study with three survey waves.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Few of the institutions represented in the sample offer the specialized vocational qualifications. Where an offer exists, trainees make little use of it. Trainees feel that the nursing training does not prepare them equally well for the different care areas.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The qualitative and quantitative findings demonstrate that general nursing training and the general vocational qualification are the preferred choice. Many vocational trainers consider general nursing training to be appropriate in order to meet the complex care requirements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In particular, the practical part of the general nursing training must provide a more appropriate representation of care-oriented pediatric care settings. In order to cope with the fundamental transformation associated with generalistics, further training programs need to be established that adequately qualify future nurses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 86-93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921725000479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The new Nursing Professions Act has been in force in Germany since 2020. Since then, general nursing training has been implemented. The reform of nursing training was the subject of controversial debate beforehand. Concerns were raised about inadequate preparation for different care sectors and settings. As a result, it is possible to choose specialized vocational qualifications in addition to the general nurse training. The article addresses how trainees are currently trained to meet the requirements in nursing and whether specialized vocational qualifications are chosen.

Methods

The article presents the results of an accompanying scientific research project (2021–2024). In this mixed methods study, a convergent parallel design was applied. The article is based on 80 guideline-based interviews with vocational trainers. Additionally, trainees were surveyed online in a longitudinal cohort study with three survey waves.

Results

Few of the institutions represented in the sample offer the specialized vocational qualifications. Where an offer exists, trainees make little use of it. Trainees feel that the nursing training does not prepare them equally well for the different care areas.

Discussion

The qualitative and quantitative findings demonstrate that general nursing training and the general vocational qualification are the preferred choice. Many vocational trainers consider general nursing training to be appropriate in order to meet the complex care requirements.

Conclusion

In particular, the practical part of the general nursing training must provide a more appropriate representation of care-oriented pediatric care settings. In order to cope with the fundamental transformation associated with generalistics, further training programs need to be established that adequately qualify future nurses.
[从职业培训人员和受训人员的角度看普通护理培训中选择专业职业资格权利的重要性--附带混合方法研究的结果]。
导读:新的《护理专业法》自2020年起在德国生效。从那时起,实施了一般护理培训。护理培训改革是事先争论的主题。有人对不同护理部门和环境的准备不足表示关切。因此,除了普通护士培训外,还可以选择专业的职业资格。本文讨论了目前如何培训受训人员以满足护理要求以及是否选择专业职业资格。方法:本文介绍了一项配套科研项目(2021-2024)的研究结果。在混合方法研究中,采用了收敛并行设计。这篇文章是基于对职业培训师的80个基于指导原则的访谈。此外,学员在纵向队列研究中进行了三波在线调查。结果:样本中提供专业职业资格的院校较少。即使有工作机会,受训者也很少利用它。受训者认为护理培训并没有让他们为不同的护理领域做好同等的准备。讨论:定性和定量结果表明,一般护理培训和一般职业资格是首选。许多职业培训师认为一般护理培训是适当的,以满足复杂的护理要求。结论:特别是,普通护理培训的实践部分必须提供更合适的以护理为导向的儿科护理环境。为了应对与通才相关的根本性转变,需要建立进一步的培训计划,以充分合格未来的护士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信