Locations of metastases in and oncological outcomes of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: Real-world data from a multicenter study
{"title":"Locations of metastases in and oncological outcomes of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: Real-world data from a multicenter study","authors":"Fumihiko Urabe M.D., Ph.D. , Kojiro Tashiro M.D. , Katsuki Muramoto M.D. , Takafumi Yanagisawa M.D., Ph.D. , Kota Katsumi M.D. , Hidetsugu Takahashi M.D. , Shuhei Hara M.D. , Wataru Fukuokaya M.D. , Yu Imai M.D., Ph.D. , Kosuke Iwatani M.D. , Mahito Atsuta M.D. , Keiichiro Mori M.D., Ph.D. , Taro Igarashi M.D., Ph.D. , Shoji Kimura M.D., Ph.D. , Masaya Murakami M.D., Ph.D. , Shunsuke Tsuzuki M.D., Ph.D. , Takaya Sasaki M.D., Ph.D. , Tatsuya Shimomura M.D., Ph.D. , Jun Miki M.D., Ph.D. , Takahiro Kimura M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Androgen receptor-signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) have significantly changed the preferred treatments for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Despite such advances, the prognostic significance of metastases at specific sites remains unclear. This study evaluated how metastatic site affected the oncological outcomes of mCSPC patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective multicenter study included 716 mCSPC patients receiving androgen- deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy, or both ARSI and ADT (ARSI doublet) from February 2018 to June 2023. All patients were categorized based on their metastatic sites. The primary endpoint was the time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) development; the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox's regression models were used to analyze the survival outcomes. We stratified mCSPC patients with bone metastases by the volumes of such metastases and lung metastasis status, and explored the clinical significance of lung metastasis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients with lung-only metastases experienced better outcomes than those with other visceral metastases. On multivariate analysis, the bone metastasis volume, but not lung metastasis status, significantly affected CRPC-free survival status. No significant difference in any of CRPC, PFS2, CSS, or OS status was apparent among patients with bone metastases with or without lung metastases. In terms of interaction, lung metastasis did not significantly affect the prognoses of patients with either low- or high-volume bone metastases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In the present era of ARSI doublet therapy, lung-only metastases in mCSPC patients were associated with favorable outcomes. The negative prognostic effects of lung metastases were much lower than was the bone metastasis volume, indicating that treatments targeting low-volume disease may be adequate even when lung metastases are apparent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":"43 5","pages":"Pages 336.e1-336.e11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143925000365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Androgen receptor-signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) have significantly changed the preferred treatments for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Despite such advances, the prognostic significance of metastases at specific sites remains unclear. This study evaluated how metastatic site affected the oncological outcomes of mCSPC patients.
Methods
This retrospective multicenter study included 716 mCSPC patients receiving androgen- deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy, or both ARSI and ADT (ARSI doublet) from February 2018 to June 2023. All patients were categorized based on their metastatic sites. The primary endpoint was the time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) development; the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox's regression models were used to analyze the survival outcomes. We stratified mCSPC patients with bone metastases by the volumes of such metastases and lung metastasis status, and explored the clinical significance of lung metastasis.
Results
Patients with lung-only metastases experienced better outcomes than those with other visceral metastases. On multivariate analysis, the bone metastasis volume, but not lung metastasis status, significantly affected CRPC-free survival status. No significant difference in any of CRPC, PFS2, CSS, or OS status was apparent among patients with bone metastases with or without lung metastases. In terms of interaction, lung metastasis did not significantly affect the prognoses of patients with either low- or high-volume bone metastases.
Conclusion
In the present era of ARSI doublet therapy, lung-only metastases in mCSPC patients were associated with favorable outcomes. The negative prognostic effects of lung metastases were much lower than was the bone metastasis volume, indicating that treatments targeting low-volume disease may be adequate even when lung metastases are apparent.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.