Neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition among healthcare providers after Helping Babies Breathe simulation training using improved tools across two regions in Tanzania.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Florence Salvatory Kalabamu, Vickfarajaeli Daudi, Robert Moshiro, Benjamin Kamala, Paschal Mdoe, Dunstan Bishanga, Hege Ersdal, Rose Mpembeni
{"title":"Neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition among healthcare providers after Helping Babies Breathe simulation training using improved tools across two regions in Tanzania.","authors":"Florence Salvatory Kalabamu, Vickfarajaeli Daudi, Robert Moshiro, Benjamin Kamala, Paschal Mdoe, Dunstan Bishanga, Hege Ersdal, Rose Mpembeni","doi":"10.1186/s41077-025-00338-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neonatal mortality is high in middle- and low-income countries, including Tanzania. Most of these deaths are preventable and linked to suboptimal quality of care. In this study, we assessed neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition after a 1-day Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) simulation training using improved tools and associated factors among healthcare providers in 12 facilities in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare providers working in the labor wards in selected health facilities. The training was conducted in situ using the HBB second edition curriculum with improved simulation tools (Neonatalie Live simulator, NeoBeat heart rate meter, and Upright resuscitator). After training, skills acquisition was evaluated using Objectively Structured Clinical Evaluation. Participants who scored an average of 75% or above were considered passing. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the proportion of staff who passed the evaluation by different demographic categories. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean scores among demographic categories. Factors associated with neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition were analyzed using modified Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 481 participants were enrolled in the study. Among these, 420 (87.3%) passed the skills evaluation on the first attempt. The overall mean skills score was 92.4%. In bivariable analysis, health facility level, region, age, and experience working in the labor ward were associated with passing skills evaluation on the first attempt. However, after controlling other variables in a multivariable model, none of the factors showed a statistically significant association.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In-situ, HBB simulation training using improved training tools effectively imparts neonatal resuscitation skills among healthcare providers. Participants learned skills similarly regardless of their different demographic characteristics, including level of education and working experience. Due to its potential to impart skills, frequent simulation training using improved tools may be considered for scaling up in other health facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"10 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00338-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Neonatal mortality is high in middle- and low-income countries, including Tanzania. Most of these deaths are preventable and linked to suboptimal quality of care. In this study, we assessed neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition after a 1-day Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) simulation training using improved tools and associated factors among healthcare providers in 12 facilities in Tanzania.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare providers working in the labor wards in selected health facilities. The training was conducted in situ using the HBB second edition curriculum with improved simulation tools (Neonatalie Live simulator, NeoBeat heart rate meter, and Upright resuscitator). After training, skills acquisition was evaluated using Objectively Structured Clinical Evaluation. Participants who scored an average of 75% or above were considered passing. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the proportion of staff who passed the evaluation by different demographic categories. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean scores among demographic categories. Factors associated with neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition were analyzed using modified Poisson regression.

Results: A total of 481 participants were enrolled in the study. Among these, 420 (87.3%) passed the skills evaluation on the first attempt. The overall mean skills score was 92.4%. In bivariable analysis, health facility level, region, age, and experience working in the labor ward were associated with passing skills evaluation on the first attempt. However, after controlling other variables in a multivariable model, none of the factors showed a statistically significant association.

Conclusion: In-situ, HBB simulation training using improved training tools effectively imparts neonatal resuscitation skills among healthcare providers. Participants learned skills similarly regardless of their different demographic characteristics, including level of education and working experience. Due to its potential to impart skills, frequent simulation training using improved tools may be considered for scaling up in other health facilities.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信