Treatment Outcomes at Skeletal Maturity After Physeal-sparing Procedures for Early-onset Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Using a Long Screw With a Short-threaded Tip.

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Kwang Ryeol Lee, Whei Jun Kim, Wonik Lee, Chang Ho Shin, Tae-Joon Cho, In Ho Choi, Mi Hyun Song
{"title":"Treatment Outcomes at Skeletal Maturity After Physeal-sparing Procedures for Early-onset Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Using a Long Screw With a Short-threaded Tip.","authors":"Kwang Ryeol Lee, Whei Jun Kim, Wonik Lee, Chang Ho Shin, Tae-Joon Cho, In Ho Choi, Mi Hyun Song","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physeal-sparing procedures are preferred for treating early-onset slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), reducing limb-length discrepancy (LLD), and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study aimed to investigate the treatment outcomes after physeal-sparing procedures for early-onset SCFE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed medical and radiographic records of SCFE patients from 1992 to 2022. Patients under 11 years old and followed up to skeletal maturity were included. Physeal-sparing procedures using a long screw with a short-threaded tip were performed in patients with mild to moderate slips since 2008. Patients were dichotomized into physeal-sparing and traditional in situ fixation (ISF) groups. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were comparatively analyzed between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients underwent physeal-sparing procedures, whereas 12 patients underwent traditional ISF. There was no further slippage in either group. During follow-up, slip angle was significantly decreased in the physeal-sparing group compared with the traditional ISF group (22.0 vs. 8.8 deg, respectively, P<0.01). LLD of>20 mm did not occur in the physeal-sparing group, but was observed in the traditional ISF group (P<0.01). Femoral neck length (FNL), articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD), α angle, and femoral head-neck offset of the physeal-sparing side were comparable to the unaffected healthy side (P=0.08, P=0.25, P=0.14, P=0.13), but differences were seen in healthy versus traditional ISF sides (P<0.01, P<0.01, P<0.01, and P<0.01, respectively). In addition, consistent growth was observed in the physeal-sparing side, but premature physeal arrest developed in the traditional ISF side. Six physeal-sparing patients required screw change procedures as the proximal femur outgrew the screw. The physeal-sparing group scored higher modified Harris Hip Score points than the traditional ISF group (89.5 vs. 85.3, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a long screw with a short-threaded tip can stabilize the proximal femoral physis. It may also allow the continual growth and remodeling of the proximal femur in the treatment of early-onset SCFE.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002942","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physeal-sparing procedures are preferred for treating early-onset slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), reducing limb-length discrepancy (LLD), and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study aimed to investigate the treatment outcomes after physeal-sparing procedures for early-onset SCFE.

Methods: We reviewed medical and radiographic records of SCFE patients from 1992 to 2022. Patients under 11 years old and followed up to skeletal maturity were included. Physeal-sparing procedures using a long screw with a short-threaded tip were performed in patients with mild to moderate slips since 2008. Patients were dichotomized into physeal-sparing and traditional in situ fixation (ISF) groups. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were comparatively analyzed between the groups.

Results: Fifteen patients underwent physeal-sparing procedures, whereas 12 patients underwent traditional ISF. There was no further slippage in either group. During follow-up, slip angle was significantly decreased in the physeal-sparing group compared with the traditional ISF group (22.0 vs. 8.8 deg, respectively, P<0.01). LLD of>20 mm did not occur in the physeal-sparing group, but was observed in the traditional ISF group (P<0.01). Femoral neck length (FNL), articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD), α angle, and femoral head-neck offset of the physeal-sparing side were comparable to the unaffected healthy side (P=0.08, P=0.25, P=0.14, P=0.13), but differences were seen in healthy versus traditional ISF sides (P<0.01, P<0.01, P<0.01, and P<0.01, respectively). In addition, consistent growth was observed in the physeal-sparing side, but premature physeal arrest developed in the traditional ISF side. Six physeal-sparing patients required screw change procedures as the proximal femur outgrew the screw. The physeal-sparing group scored higher modified Harris Hip Score points than the traditional ISF group (89.5 vs. 85.3, respectively).

Conclusions: Using a long screw with a short-threaded tip can stabilize the proximal femoral physis. It may also allow the continual growth and remodeling of the proximal femur in the treatment of early-onset SCFE.

Level of evidence: Level III.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信