{"title":"[Assessment of developmental neurotoxicity of pharmaceuticals using zebrafish behavior].","authors":"Yuhei Nishimura","doi":"10.1254/fpj.24085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmaceuticals used for pregnant women must be safe for the babies while therapeutic to the mothers. To ensure the safety of drugs, developmental neurotoxicity should be evaluated although it is currently not a mandatory requirement in the US and Europe at the regulatory level. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has constituted the test guideline (TG426) to assess developmental neurotoxicity. TG426 requires various assessments using animals (assuming rats), including the brain weight, neuropathology, locomotion, sensorimotor function, and learning ability of dams from the mother treated with the chemical during pregnancy. Due to the huge burden of the cost, time, and labor, the number of chemicals evaluated for developmental neurotoxicity by TG426 remains around 200. To boost the pace of the assessment, OCED has constituted a novel guideline (No. 377) adopting in vitro test batteries. OCED has also evaluated the utility of the neurobehavior of zebrafish larvae in the assessment of developmental neurotoxicity. In this review, I focus on valproic acid, a therapeutic drug to treat epilepsy and bipolar disorder and a well-known developmental neurotoxicant, and summarize the studies using zebrafish neurobehavior to assess the developmental neurotoxicity of valproic acid. The utility and validity of zebrafish neurobehavior for developmental neurotoxicity testing are discussed by comparing the findings from rodents and humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":12208,"journal":{"name":"Folia Pharmacologica Japonica","volume":"160 2","pages":"115-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Pharmacologica Japonica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1254/fpj.24085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pharmaceuticals used for pregnant women must be safe for the babies while therapeutic to the mothers. To ensure the safety of drugs, developmental neurotoxicity should be evaluated although it is currently not a mandatory requirement in the US and Europe at the regulatory level. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has constituted the test guideline (TG426) to assess developmental neurotoxicity. TG426 requires various assessments using animals (assuming rats), including the brain weight, neuropathology, locomotion, sensorimotor function, and learning ability of dams from the mother treated with the chemical during pregnancy. Due to the huge burden of the cost, time, and labor, the number of chemicals evaluated for developmental neurotoxicity by TG426 remains around 200. To boost the pace of the assessment, OCED has constituted a novel guideline (No. 377) adopting in vitro test batteries. OCED has also evaluated the utility of the neurobehavior of zebrafish larvae in the assessment of developmental neurotoxicity. In this review, I focus on valproic acid, a therapeutic drug to treat epilepsy and bipolar disorder and a well-known developmental neurotoxicant, and summarize the studies using zebrafish neurobehavior to assess the developmental neurotoxicity of valproic acid. The utility and validity of zebrafish neurobehavior for developmental neurotoxicity testing are discussed by comparing the findings from rodents and humans.