Chenxi Wang, Senpeng Zhang, Jun Xu, Honghao Wang, Qizheng Wang, Yupeng Zhu, Xiaoying Xing, Dapeng Hao, Ning Lang
{"title":"Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model to Simulate Contrast-enhanced spinal MRI of Spinal Tumors: A Multi-Center Study.","authors":"Chenxi Wang, Senpeng Zhang, Jun Xu, Honghao Wang, Qizheng Wang, Yupeng Zhu, Xiaoying Xing, Dapeng Hao, Ning Lang","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.02.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To generate virtual T1 contrast-enhanced (T1CE) sequences from plain spinal MRI sequences using the denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) and to compare its performance against one baseline model pix2pix and three advanced models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1195 consecutive spinal tumor patients who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI at two hospitals were divided into a training set (n = 809, 49 ± 17 years, 437 men), an internal test set (n = 203, 50 ± 16 years, 105 men), and an external test set (n = 183, 52 ± 16 years, 94 men). Input sequences were T1- and T2-weighted images, and T2 fat-saturation images. The output was T1CE images. In the test set, one radiologist read the virtual images and marked all visible enhancing lesions. Results were evaluated using sensitivity (SE) and false discovery rate (FDR). We compared differences in lesion size and enhancement degree between reference and virtual images, and calculated signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for image quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the external test set, the mean squared error was 0.0038±0.0065, and structural similarity index 0.78±0.10. Upon evaluation by the reader, the overall SE of the generated T1CE images was 94% with FDR 2%. There was no difference in lesion size or signal intensity ratio between the reference and generated images. The CNR was higher in the generated images than the reference images (9.241 vs. 4.021; P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed DDPM demonstrates potential as an alternative to gadolinium contrast in spinal MRI examinations of oncologic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.02.024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: To generate virtual T1 contrast-enhanced (T1CE) sequences from plain spinal MRI sequences using the denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) and to compare its performance against one baseline model pix2pix and three advanced models.
Methods: A total of 1195 consecutive spinal tumor patients who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI at two hospitals were divided into a training set (n = 809, 49 ± 17 years, 437 men), an internal test set (n = 203, 50 ± 16 years, 105 men), and an external test set (n = 183, 52 ± 16 years, 94 men). Input sequences were T1- and T2-weighted images, and T2 fat-saturation images. The output was T1CE images. In the test set, one radiologist read the virtual images and marked all visible enhancing lesions. Results were evaluated using sensitivity (SE) and false discovery rate (FDR). We compared differences in lesion size and enhancement degree between reference and virtual images, and calculated signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for image quality assessment.
Results: In the external test set, the mean squared error was 0.0038±0.0065, and structural similarity index 0.78±0.10. Upon evaluation by the reader, the overall SE of the generated T1CE images was 94% with FDR 2%. There was no difference in lesion size or signal intensity ratio between the reference and generated images. The CNR was higher in the generated images than the reference images (9.241 vs. 4.021; P<0.001).
Conclusion: The proposed DDPM demonstrates potential as an alternative to gadolinium contrast in spinal MRI examinations of oncologic patients.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.