A Real-World Evaluation of Frontline Treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Azacitidine Plus Venetoclax.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Joseph Brandwein, David Page, Elena Liew, Mark Hnatiuk, Lauren Bolster, Marlene Hamilton, Daniel Sawler, Peng Wang
{"title":"A Real-World Evaluation of Frontline Treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Azacitidine Plus Venetoclax.","authors":"Joseph Brandwein, David Page, Elena Liew, Mark Hnatiuk, Lauren Bolster, Marlene Hamilton, Daniel Sawler, Peng Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.01.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The combination of venetoclax + azacitidine (VenAza) has become the standard frontline treatment for older unfit AML patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed outcomes using VenAza for previously untreated unfit AML patients at a single center between 2020-2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate (ORR) was 69/105 (66%), was highest for patients with NPM1 (78%) and IDH1/2 (82%) mutations and lowest with TP53 mutations (40%). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.6 months, and 16.3 months for those achieving CR/CRi. There was no significant difference in OS between those achieving CR and CRi (p = 0.077). Patients treated between 2022-24 had a lower early death rate (8% vs. 22%) and better OS (median 10.4 vs 5.8 mos, p = 0.033) than those treated between 2020-21. There was no difference in OS between by age grouping or for patients with prior hypomethylating agent exposure. Patients with FLT3-ITD/RAS or TP53 mutations had an inferior OS compared with the other patients (median OS 8.1, 1.7 and 16 months, respectively). On multivariate analysis, achievement of CR/CRi was associated with better OS (p < 0.001), and FLT3-ITS/RAS/TP53 mutations were associated with inferior OS (p = 0.003), while ELN2022 risk group was not associated with OS. The median DFS for patients achieving CR/CRi was 7.1, 4.9 and 21 mos, for those with FLT3-ITD/RAS, TP53 and others, respectively (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This real-world analysis confirmed the prognostic importance of the mutational risk classification with VenAza treatment. OS was inferior to that reported in the VIALE A study but did improve over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.01.024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The combination of venetoclax + azacitidine (VenAza) has become the standard frontline treatment for older unfit AML patients.

Methods: We analyzed outcomes using VenAza for previously untreated unfit AML patients at a single center between 2020-2024.

Results: The overall response rate (ORR) was 69/105 (66%), was highest for patients with NPM1 (78%) and IDH1/2 (82%) mutations and lowest with TP53 mutations (40%). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.6 months, and 16.3 months for those achieving CR/CRi. There was no significant difference in OS between those achieving CR and CRi (p = 0.077). Patients treated between 2022-24 had a lower early death rate (8% vs. 22%) and better OS (median 10.4 vs 5.8 mos, p = 0.033) than those treated between 2020-21. There was no difference in OS between by age grouping or for patients with prior hypomethylating agent exposure. Patients with FLT3-ITD/RAS or TP53 mutations had an inferior OS compared with the other patients (median OS 8.1, 1.7 and 16 months, respectively). On multivariate analysis, achievement of CR/CRi was associated with better OS (p < 0.001), and FLT3-ITS/RAS/TP53 mutations were associated with inferior OS (p = 0.003), while ELN2022 risk group was not associated with OS. The median DFS for patients achieving CR/CRi was 7.1, 4.9 and 21 mos, for those with FLT3-ITD/RAS, TP53 and others, respectively (p = 0.003).

Conclusions: This real-world analysis confirmed the prognostic importance of the mutational risk classification with VenAza treatment. OS was inferior to that reported in the VIALE A study but did improve over time.

背景Venetoclax+阿扎胞苷(VenAza)联合疗法已成为老年不适合AML患者的标准一线治疗方法:我们分析了一个中心在2020-2024年间使用VenAza治疗既往未经治疗的不适合AML患者的结果:总反应率(ORR)为69/105(66%),NPM1(78%)和IDH1/2(82%)突变患者的总反应率最高,TP53突变患者的总反应率最低(40%)。中位总生存期(OS)为9.6个月,达到CR/CRi的患者为16.3个月。达到CR和CRi的患者的OS无明显差异(p = 0.077)。与2020-21年间接受治疗的患者相比,2022-24年间接受治疗的患者早期死亡率较低(8% vs. 22%),OS较好(中位10.4个月 vs. 5.8个月,p = 0.033)。不同年龄组或曾接触过低甲基化药物的患者的 OS 没有差异。与其他患者相比,FLT3-ITD/RAS或TP53突变患者的OS较差(中位OS分别为8.1个月、1.7个月和16个月)。多变量分析显示,达到CR/CRi与较好的OS相关(p < 0.001),FLT3-ITS/RAS/TP53突变与较差的OS相关(p = 0.003),而ELN2022风险组与OS无关。FLT3-ITD/RAS、TP53和其他基因突变患者达到CR/CRi的中位DFS分别为7.1、4.9和21天(p = 0.003):这项真实世界分析证实了VenAza治疗中突变风险分类对预后的重要性。OS 不如 VIALE A 研究报告的结果,但随着时间的推移确实有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信