Workforce Dementia Training Needs and Preferences for Residential Aged Care.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Hannah Gulline, Lauren Bruce, Marta Woolford, Phillipa Horsman, Niluksha Morawaka, Silvia Alberti, Darshini Ayton
{"title":"Workforce Dementia Training Needs and Preferences for Residential Aged Care.","authors":"Hannah Gulline, Lauren Bruce, Marta Woolford, Phillipa Horsman, Niluksha Morawaka, Silvia Alberti, Darshini Ayton","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore residential aged care (RAC) staff and volunteers' needs and preferences for dementia training.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed methods action research study was conducted to codesign a new Dementia Model of Care for RAC homes provider Baptcare. This paper reports on one component of model development and implementation: understanding the training that staff and volunteers receive about dementia, and subsequently, through a needs assessment process, identifying their needs and preferences for dementia training.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Staff and volunteers from 8 RAC homes participated in a survey (staff n = 275; volunteers n = 11), with a 77.5% completion rate (n = 241). Forty-five staff and 5 volunteers completed focus groups/interviews about their dementia knowledge, current training, future training preferences, and factors influencing access to training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey included the Confidence in Dementia (CODE) Scale and Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale (DKAS) validated tools and additional training content and delivery questions. Survey data were analyzed descriptively. Transcripts were analyzed thematically and then mapped to training topics/approaches identified from the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although staff and volunteers felt \"somewhat confident\" to care for residents living with dementia, gaps in dementia knowledge were identified. Staff and volunteers addressed this knowledge gap through internal training modules or external informal or formal training. Survey comments resulted in 3 key desired training topics identified: person-centered care, dementia knowledge and behavior management, and understanding the resident's experience. Four approaches to training were recognized: in-person over online training, self-directed learning, peer-to-peer learning, and training new staff/volunteers during onboarding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Additional staff and volunteer training is required to address knowledge gaps and promote the delivery of quality care. Considering staff and volunteers' needs and preferences as well as addressing barriers to training is crucial to building workforce capacity and improving dementia care provision in RAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105495"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore residential aged care (RAC) staff and volunteers' needs and preferences for dementia training.

Design: A mixed methods action research study was conducted to codesign a new Dementia Model of Care for RAC homes provider Baptcare. This paper reports on one component of model development and implementation: understanding the training that staff and volunteers receive about dementia, and subsequently, through a needs assessment process, identifying their needs and preferences for dementia training.

Setting and participants: Staff and volunteers from 8 RAC homes participated in a survey (staff n = 275; volunteers n = 11), with a 77.5% completion rate (n = 241). Forty-five staff and 5 volunteers completed focus groups/interviews about their dementia knowledge, current training, future training preferences, and factors influencing access to training.

Methods: The survey included the Confidence in Dementia (CODE) Scale and Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale (DKAS) validated tools and additional training content and delivery questions. Survey data were analyzed descriptively. Transcripts were analyzed thematically and then mapped to training topics/approaches identified from the data.

Results: Although staff and volunteers felt "somewhat confident" to care for residents living with dementia, gaps in dementia knowledge were identified. Staff and volunteers addressed this knowledge gap through internal training modules or external informal or formal training. Survey comments resulted in 3 key desired training topics identified: person-centered care, dementia knowledge and behavior management, and understanding the resident's experience. Four approaches to training were recognized: in-person over online training, self-directed learning, peer-to-peer learning, and training new staff/volunteers during onboarding.

Conclusions and implications: Additional staff and volunteer training is required to address knowledge gaps and promote the delivery of quality care. Considering staff and volunteers' needs and preferences as well as addressing barriers to training is crucial to building workforce capacity and improving dementia care provision in RAC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信