Effect of Salivary Flow Rate, Particle Size, and Concentration on Sensations and Liking for Fiber-Fortified Beverages

IF 2.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Kai Kai Ma, Nicole M. Etter, John E. Hayes
{"title":"Effect of Salivary Flow Rate, Particle Size, and Concentration on Sensations and Liking for Fiber-Fortified Beverages","authors":"Kai Kai Ma,&nbsp;Nicole M. Etter,&nbsp;John E. Hayes","doi":"10.1111/jtxs.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Xerostomia (perceived oral dryness) is a common problem in older adults, often due to hyposalivation, which can cause difficulty in eating and swallowing, resulting in insufficient dietary fiber intake. Recent work shows salivary flow rate, particle size, and concentration are major factors for particle perception in beverages. Given that disliking drives non-consumption, here we explore how particle size, concentration, and salivary flow rate may affect liking in a fiber-fortified model beverage. Beverages made with 2 particle sizes of wheat brans (D<sub>90</sub> = 976 μm and 209 μm) in 3 concentrations (5%, 7.5%, 10% w/v) were compared to a control beverage (no fiber added) and 2 commercial fiber-fortified beverages (Detoxifiber, ARG Cellulose) at 7.5% w/v concentration. Under controlled laboratory conditions, 90 adults (30% men, 58% women; age range = 18–79 years) rated beverage liking and the intensity of particles remaining in the mouth/throat. Individuals were divided into low and high salivary flow groups; rinsing time and rinse water weight were also recorded following consumption. As expected, higher particle concentration reduced liking, but particle size showed no main effect on liking. Surprisingly, no significant difference was found between salivary flow groups on liking and remaining particles perception. However, we saw a significant negative correlation (<i>r</i> = −0.93) between liking and particles remaining ratings. Collectively, higher concentration reduced liking, but finer particles have less impact on liking at moderate concentrations. Product developers should avoid formulating highly concentrated fiber supplement beverages and consider using finer particles to prevent beverage unacceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":17175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of texture studies","volume":"56 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtxs.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of texture studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jtxs.70009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Xerostomia (perceived oral dryness) is a common problem in older adults, often due to hyposalivation, which can cause difficulty in eating and swallowing, resulting in insufficient dietary fiber intake. Recent work shows salivary flow rate, particle size, and concentration are major factors for particle perception in beverages. Given that disliking drives non-consumption, here we explore how particle size, concentration, and salivary flow rate may affect liking in a fiber-fortified model beverage. Beverages made with 2 particle sizes of wheat brans (D90 = 976 μm and 209 μm) in 3 concentrations (5%, 7.5%, 10% w/v) were compared to a control beverage (no fiber added) and 2 commercial fiber-fortified beverages (Detoxifiber, ARG Cellulose) at 7.5% w/v concentration. Under controlled laboratory conditions, 90 adults (30% men, 58% women; age range = 18–79 years) rated beverage liking and the intensity of particles remaining in the mouth/throat. Individuals were divided into low and high salivary flow groups; rinsing time and rinse water weight were also recorded following consumption. As expected, higher particle concentration reduced liking, but particle size showed no main effect on liking. Surprisingly, no significant difference was found between salivary flow groups on liking and remaining particles perception. However, we saw a significant negative correlation (r = −0.93) between liking and particles remaining ratings. Collectively, higher concentration reduced liking, but finer particles have less impact on liking at moderate concentrations. Product developers should avoid formulating highly concentrated fiber supplement beverages and consider using finer particles to prevent beverage unacceptability.

Abstract Image

唾液流速、粒度和浓度对纤维强化饮料的感觉和喜爱的影响
口干症(感觉口腔干燥)是老年人的常见问题,通常是由于唾液分泌不足,这可能导致进食和吞咽困难,导致膳食纤维摄入不足。最近的研究表明,唾液流速、颗粒大小和浓度是饮料中颗粒感知的主要因素。考虑到不喜欢驱动不消费,在这里我们探索颗粒大小,浓度和唾液流量如何影响对纤维强化模型饮料的喜爱。将2种粒径的麦麸(D90 = 976 μm和209 μm)在3种浓度(5%、7.5%、10% w/v)下制成的饮料与对照饮料(不添加纤维)和2种商业纤维强化饮料(Detoxifiber, ARG Cellulose)在7.5% w/v浓度下制成的饮料进行比较。在受控的实验室条件下,90名成年人(男性30%,女性58%;年龄范围= 18-79岁)对饮料的喜爱程度和残留在口腔/喉咙中的颗粒强度进行评分。将个体分为低流量组和高流量组;冲洗时间和冲洗水的重量也被记录下来。正如预期的那样,较高的颗粒浓度降低了喜欢度,但颗粒大小对喜欢度没有主要影响。令人惊讶的是,在唾液流组之间,在喜欢和剩余颗粒感知上没有发现显著差异。然而,我们发现喜欢程度和颗粒剩余评分之间存在显著的负相关(r = - 0.93)。总的来说,较高的浓度降低了喜欢度,但较细的颗粒在中等浓度下对喜欢度的影响较小。产品开发人员应避免配制高度浓缩的纤维补充饮料,并考虑使用更细的颗粒,以防止饮料不可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of texture studies
Journal of texture studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Texture Studies is a fully peer-reviewed international journal specialized in the physics, physiology, and psychology of food oral processing, with an emphasis on the food texture and structure, sensory perception and mouth-feel, food oral behaviour, food liking and preference. The journal was first published in 1969 and has been the primary source for disseminating advances in knowledge on all of the sciences that relate to food texture. In recent years, Journal of Texture Studies has expanded its coverage to a much broader range of texture research and continues to publish high quality original and innovative experimental-based (including numerical analysis and simulation) research concerned with all aspects of eating and food preference. Journal of Texture Studies welcomes research articles, research notes, reviews, discussion papers, and communications from contributors of all relevant disciplines. Some key coverage areas/topics include (but not limited to): • Physical, mechanical, and micro-structural principles of food texture • Oral physiology • Psychology and brain responses of eating and food sensory • Food texture design and modification for specific consumers • In vitro and in vivo studies of eating and swallowing • Novel technologies and methodologies for the assessment of sensory properties • Simulation and numerical analysis of eating and swallowing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信