Correction to “Advantages of Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision With Partial Prostatectomy Compared With Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study”
{"title":"Correction to “Advantages of Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision With Partial Prostatectomy Compared With Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/ases.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>R. Shimano, S. Kasai, H. Kagawa, et al., “Advantages of Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision With Partial Prostatectomy Compared With Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study,” <i>Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery</i> 18, no. 1 (2025): e70003.</p><p>In Table 4, the number of patients written in the Recurrence site Lung area for Robotic surgery, “1(7.1),” and its <i>p</i> value, “0.056,” were incorrect. These should have changed to “2(14.2)” and “0.177” for each.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ases.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.70042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
R. Shimano, S. Kasai, H. Kagawa, et al., “Advantages of Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision With Partial Prostatectomy Compared With Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study,” Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery 18, no. 1 (2025): e70003.
In Table 4, the number of patients written in the Recurrence site Lung area for Robotic surgery, “1(7.1),” and its p value, “0.056,” were incorrect. These should have changed to “2(14.2)” and “0.177” for each.