Effectiveness of dipyrone (metamizole) in postoperative analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.7 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Mariana Luz , Selma Alves Valente do Amaral Lopes , Bruna Brandao Barreto , Jamine da Silva Vieira , Julia Tavares-Pereira , Luisa Pereira Novaes , Dimitri Gusmao-Flores
{"title":"Effectiveness of dipyrone (metamizole) in postoperative analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mariana Luz ,&nbsp;Selma Alves Valente do Amaral Lopes ,&nbsp;Bruna Brandao Barreto ,&nbsp;Jamine da Silva Vieira ,&nbsp;Julia Tavares-Pereira ,&nbsp;Luisa Pereira Novaes ,&nbsp;Dimitri Gusmao-Flores","doi":"10.1016/j.tacc.2025.101540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postoperative pain requires effective management. This study reviews the effectiveness and safety of dipyrone/metamizole for postoperative pain management in adults and children.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The online databases Medline, OVID, Embase, and LILACS were searched in November 2024 for randomized controlled trials comparing dipyrone/metamizole with other drugs or placebo in postoperative settings. Outcomes included immediate postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption (Oral Morphine Equivalence, OME) in the first 24 h.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty studies were included. In adult patients, no significant OME differences were found between dipyrone and NSAIDs (2.1 mg; 95%CI -3.4 to 7.7), paracetamol (−1.3 mg; 95%CI -5.9 to 3.3), or placebo (−2.7 mg; 95%CI -9.2 to 3.8). In the ICU study, dipyrone showed lower OME than paracetamol (−9.9 mg; 95%CI -18.2 to −1.6). In pediatric studies, there were no differences in OME between dipyrone and paracetamol (0 mg; 95%CI -0.1 to 0.1) or placebo (−0.1 mg; 95%CI -0.3 to 0.2). No significant side effects were reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dipyrone is as effective as other non-opioid analgesics commonly used for postoperative analgesia, and more effective than paracetamol in ICU patients. The reviewed studies indicate that its use is safe, and therefore it should be considered as an option for multimodal analgesia in pain management guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44534,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101540"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210844025000243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Postoperative pain requires effective management. This study reviews the effectiveness and safety of dipyrone/metamizole for postoperative pain management in adults and children.

Materials and methods

The online databases Medline, OVID, Embase, and LILACS were searched in November 2024 for randomized controlled trials comparing dipyrone/metamizole with other drugs or placebo in postoperative settings. Outcomes included immediate postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption (Oral Morphine Equivalence, OME) in the first 24 h.

Results

Thirty studies were included. In adult patients, no significant OME differences were found between dipyrone and NSAIDs (2.1 mg; 95%CI -3.4 to 7.7), paracetamol (−1.3 mg; 95%CI -5.9 to 3.3), or placebo (−2.7 mg; 95%CI -9.2 to 3.8). In the ICU study, dipyrone showed lower OME than paracetamol (−9.9 mg; 95%CI -18.2 to −1.6). In pediatric studies, there were no differences in OME between dipyrone and paracetamol (0 mg; 95%CI -0.1 to 0.1) or placebo (−0.1 mg; 95%CI -0.3 to 0.2). No significant side effects were reported.

Conclusion

Dipyrone is as effective as other non-opioid analgesics commonly used for postoperative analgesia, and more effective than paracetamol in ICU patients. The reviewed studies indicate that its use is safe, and therefore it should be considered as an option for multimodal analgesia in pain management guidelines.
双吡隆(甲氨唑)在术后镇痛中的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
术后疼痛需要有效的治疗。本研究回顾了双吡隆/安咪唑治疗成人和儿童术后疼痛的有效性和安全性。材料和方法于2024年11月检索在线数据库Medline、OVID、Embase和LILACS,以比较双吡酮/元氨唑与其他药物或安慰剂在术后环境中的随机对照试验。结果包括术后即刻疼痛评分和前24小时阿片类药物消耗(口服吗啡当量,OME)。在成人患者中,双吡隆和非甾体抗炎药(2.1 mg;95%CI -3.4 ~ 7.7),扑热息痛(- 1.3 mg;95%CI -5.9 - 3.3),或安慰剂(- 2.7 mg;95%CI -9.2 ~ 3.8)。在ICU的研究中,双吡喃酮的OME低于扑热息痛(- 9.9 mg;95%CI -18.2 ~−1.6)。在儿科研究中,双吡酮和扑热息痛(0 mg;95%CI -0.1 ~ 0.1)或安慰剂(-0.1 mg;95%CI -0.3 ~ 0.2)。没有明显的副作用报告。结论双吡隆用于ICU患者术后镇痛的效果与其他常用非阿片类镇痛药相当,优于扑热息痛。综述的研究表明,它的使用是安全的,因此它应该被认为是疼痛管理指南中多模式镇痛的一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
60
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信