The utility of initial lactate for the quick sequential organ failure assessment (LqSOFA) for emergency septic patients

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Saqer M. Althunayyan MBBS SBEM , Ahmed Abdullah Aledeny MBBS , Mohammed A. Malabarey MBBS , Ali Ibrahim Alshaqaqiq MBBS , Eyman Okbah Haj-Ali MBBS , Mhd Walid Alhomsi MBBS , Hagar Khaled Elgazar MBBS , Tamim S.M. Alrefaei MBBS , Saad Ali AlAsiri MBBS
{"title":"The utility of initial lactate for the quick sequential organ failure assessment (LqSOFA) for emergency septic patients","authors":"Saqer M. Althunayyan MBBS SBEM ,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdullah Aledeny MBBS ,&nbsp;Mohammed A. Malabarey MBBS ,&nbsp;Ali Ibrahim Alshaqaqiq MBBS ,&nbsp;Eyman Okbah Haj-Ali MBBS ,&nbsp;Mhd Walid Alhomsi MBBS ,&nbsp;Hagar Khaled Elgazar MBBS ,&nbsp;Tamim S.M. Alrefaei MBBS ,&nbsp;Saad Ali AlAsiri MBBS","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.02.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Lactate-enhanced Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (LqSOFA) has been identified as a tool for predicting sepsis outcomes. We evaluated the predictive power of the LqSOFA for adult patients suspected of having sepsis in the Emergency Department (ED). It was assessed as an indicator for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, the necessity for vasopressors, and mortality within 72 h. This was then compared with the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective, cohort observational study of suspected sepsis patients from four branches of Dr. Sulaiman Al-Habib Medical Group (HMG) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 1 May 2022 to 30 April 2023. We calculated the initial LqSOFA and qSOFA for all patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve were evaluated for both LqSOFA and qSOFA scores (with ≥2 criteria) for each targeted outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included a total of 1274 patients, the majority of whom were males (754 (59.2 %)), with a mean age of 68.80 ± 17.9 years. LqSOFA demonstrated higher sensitivity for ICU admission, vasopressor requirement, and mortality (48 %, 68 %, and 76 % respectively) in comparison to qSOFA (30 %, 50 %, and 71 % respectively). However, the specificities of the LqSOFA score for ICU admission, vasopressor requirements, and mortality were lower (81 %, 71 %, and 67 % respectively) than those of the qSOFA score (89 %, 83 %, and 80 % respectively). The AUC of LqSOFA was greater than that of qSOFA for each outcome of interest but the difference was only statistically significant for mortality outcome (<em>p</em>-value &lt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LqSOFA exhibits strong predictive reliability compared to qSOFA. Prospective multiregional studies need to be conducted to validate LqSOFA's performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"Pages 118-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725001500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Lactate-enhanced Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (LqSOFA) has been identified as a tool for predicting sepsis outcomes. We evaluated the predictive power of the LqSOFA for adult patients suspected of having sepsis in the Emergency Department (ED). It was assessed as an indicator for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, the necessity for vasopressors, and mortality within 72 h. This was then compared with the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, cohort observational study of suspected sepsis patients from four branches of Dr. Sulaiman Al-Habib Medical Group (HMG) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 1 May 2022 to 30 April 2023. We calculated the initial LqSOFA and qSOFA for all patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve were evaluated for both LqSOFA and qSOFA scores (with ≥2 criteria) for each targeted outcome.

Results

The study included a total of 1274 patients, the majority of whom were males (754 (59.2 %)), with a mean age of 68.80 ± 17.9 years. LqSOFA demonstrated higher sensitivity for ICU admission, vasopressor requirement, and mortality (48 %, 68 %, and 76 % respectively) in comparison to qSOFA (30 %, 50 %, and 71 % respectively). However, the specificities of the LqSOFA score for ICU admission, vasopressor requirements, and mortality were lower (81 %, 71 %, and 67 % respectively) than those of the qSOFA score (89 %, 83 %, and 80 % respectively). The AUC of LqSOFA was greater than that of qSOFA for each outcome of interest but the difference was only statistically significant for mortality outcome (p-value <0.05).

Conclusion

LqSOFA exhibits strong predictive reliability compared to qSOFA. Prospective multiregional studies need to be conducted to validate LqSOFA's performance.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信