Social Desirability Tendency in Personality-Based Job Interviews—A Question of Interview Format?

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Valerie Schröder, Anna Luca Heimann, Pia Ingold, Nicolas Roulin, Marianne Schmid Mast, Manuel Bachmann, Martin Kleinmann
{"title":"Social Desirability Tendency in Personality-Based Job Interviews—A Question of Interview Format?","authors":"Valerie Schröder,&nbsp;Anna Luca Heimann,&nbsp;Pia Ingold,&nbsp;Nicolas Roulin,&nbsp;Marianne Schmid Mast,&nbsp;Manuel Bachmann,&nbsp;Martin Kleinmann","doi":"10.1111/ijsa.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Today's variety of interview formats raises the question of their interchangeability. For personality interviews, a crucial question is whether different formats are comparably robust against applicants' social desirability tendency (SDT) to ensure an accurate measurement. Using a within-subjects design in a simulated selection setting with 211 participants, this study examined how SDT affects personality scores in a face-to-face, asynchronous video, and written interview—all with similar interview questions designed to measure personality. Relationships between interview scores and SDT were weakest in the face-to-face format and strongest in the written format and differed depending on which personality trait was assessed. The findings highlight the suitedness of different interview formats for measuring personality with important implications for interview design and personality assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today's variety of interview formats raises the question of their interchangeability. For personality interviews, a crucial question is whether different formats are comparably robust against applicants' social desirability tendency (SDT) to ensure an accurate measurement. Using a within-subjects design in a simulated selection setting with 211 participants, this study examined how SDT affects personality scores in a face-to-face, asynchronous video, and written interview—all with similar interview questions designed to measure personality. Relationships between interview scores and SDT were weakest in the face-to-face format and strongest in the written format and differed depending on which personality trait was assessed. The findings highlight the suitedness of different interview formats for measuring personality with important implications for interview design and personality assessment.

个性求职面试中的社会可取倾向——一个面试形式问题?
今天各种各样的面试形式提出了他们的可互换性的问题。对于个性面试来说,一个关键的问题是,不同的面试形式是否对应聘者的社会期望倾向(SDT)具有相当的稳稳性,以确保准确的测量。在211名参与者的模拟选择设置中,本研究使用了受试者内设计,研究了SDT如何影响面对面,异步视频和书面面试中的个性得分,所有面试都有类似的面试问题来测量个性。面试分数与SDT之间的关系在面对面形式中最弱,在书面形式中最强,并且根据评估的人格特质而有所不同。研究结果强调了不同面试形式对人格测量的适用性,对面试设计和人格评估具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
31.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Selection and Assessment publishes original articles related to all aspects of personnel selection, staffing, and assessment in organizations. Using an effective combination of academic research with professional-led best practice, IJSA aims to develop new knowledge and understanding in these important areas of work psychology and contemporary workforce management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信