Xiaoyan Gong, Yan Gong, Shuhua Peng, Qiaoying Huang, Wenting Luo, Man Jin, Ling Xiao, Liping Xiong
{"title":"The Effect of Out-of-Hospital Extended Care on the Prognosis of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","authors":"Xiaoyan Gong, Yan Gong, Shuhua Peng, Qiaoying Huang, Wenting Luo, Man Jin, Ling Xiao, Liping Xiong","doi":"10.1111/jep.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Nursing services are crucial for the recovery and prognosis of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study is to evaluate the impact of out-of-hospital extended care services on patients with COPD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 67 COPD patients were enroled in this study, divided into a control group and an intervention group. The intervention group was provided with out-of-hospital extended care services for 6 months, and at the end of the follow-up visit, the patients' psychological status, pulmonary function, and exercise endurance were assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared with the control group, patients in the intervention group showed significant improvement in pulmonary function, as reflected in FVC, FEV1, FEV1%, and FEV1/FVC. Meanwhile, after 6 months of extended care services, patients in the intervention group showed significant improvement in exercise endurance, with a significant increase in 6-min walking distance. In addition, patients in the intervention group experienced a significant reduction in anxiety and depression after extended care services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Extended care service as a new care model can significantly improve the prognosis of COPD patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Nursing services are crucial for the recovery and prognosis of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study is to evaluate the impact of out-of-hospital extended care services on patients with COPD.
Methods
A total of 67 COPD patients were enroled in this study, divided into a control group and an intervention group. The intervention group was provided with out-of-hospital extended care services for 6 months, and at the end of the follow-up visit, the patients' psychological status, pulmonary function, and exercise endurance were assessed.
Results
Compared with the control group, patients in the intervention group showed significant improvement in pulmonary function, as reflected in FVC, FEV1, FEV1%, and FEV1/FVC. Meanwhile, after 6 months of extended care services, patients in the intervention group showed significant improvement in exercise endurance, with a significant increase in 6-min walking distance. In addition, patients in the intervention group experienced a significant reduction in anxiety and depression after extended care services.
Conclusions
Extended care service as a new care model can significantly improve the prognosis of COPD patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.