4 Steps to 4Ms: A Navigation Guide for a Hospital-Based Composite Measure of 4Ms Care and the Implications for Outcomes Assessment.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Benjamin Rosner, Robert Thombley, Stephanie Rogers, Julia Adler Milstein
{"title":"4 Steps to 4Ms: A Navigation Guide for a Hospital-Based Composite Measure of 4Ms Care and the Implications for Outcomes Assessment.","authors":"Benjamin Rosner, Robert Thombley, Stephanie Rogers, Julia Adler Milstein","doi":"10.1177/00469580251323135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 4Ms Framework is the foundation of the Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) movement. While the framework is based on standalone evidence for each M, there is limited evidence about the impact on outcomes when practiced as a set. A composite measure capturing adherence to the many care processes that comprise the 4Ms is a necessary but complex component of closing the evidence gap. We offer a navigation guide that addresses key considerations for developing a hospital-based composite measure of 4Ms care. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement operationalizes the 4Ms Framework as a minimum set of Assessment and Act On care processes. In developing a composite measure of inpatient 4Ms adherence, we offer a 4 step framework with associated discussion of considerations related to composite measure type (eg, continuous, dichotomous), and synchrony within and across the Ms containing these care processes. Using real-world electronic health record data capturing care process adherence in the 4Ms implementation at a large academic hospital, we illustrate the considerations, and report the implications for sample size and composite measure scoring. We also present our selected composite measure-a dichotomous measure delineating 4Ms care when all encounter-level processes (those needing to be done only once during the hospital encounter) are followed and all day- and shift-level processes are followed for at least 50% of hospital days. While there is no single, standard approach to create a 4Ms composite at this early stage of the AFHS movement, as organizations develop their measure(s), our guide and the considerations we suggest should serve to inform this process and support progress toward meaningful measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251323135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251323135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 4Ms Framework is the foundation of the Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) movement. While the framework is based on standalone evidence for each M, there is limited evidence about the impact on outcomes when practiced as a set. A composite measure capturing adherence to the many care processes that comprise the 4Ms is a necessary but complex component of closing the evidence gap. We offer a navigation guide that addresses key considerations for developing a hospital-based composite measure of 4Ms care. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement operationalizes the 4Ms Framework as a minimum set of Assessment and Act On care processes. In developing a composite measure of inpatient 4Ms adherence, we offer a 4 step framework with associated discussion of considerations related to composite measure type (eg, continuous, dichotomous), and synchrony within and across the Ms containing these care processes. Using real-world electronic health record data capturing care process adherence in the 4Ms implementation at a large academic hospital, we illustrate the considerations, and report the implications for sample size and composite measure scoring. We also present our selected composite measure-a dichotomous measure delineating 4Ms care when all encounter-level processes (those needing to be done only once during the hospital encounter) are followed and all day- and shift-level processes are followed for at least 50% of hospital days. While there is no single, standard approach to create a 4Ms composite at this early stage of the AFHS movement, as organizations develop their measure(s), our guide and the considerations we suggest should serve to inform this process and support progress toward meaningful measurement.

4Ms 的 4 个步骤:以医院为基础的 4Ms 护理综合测量导航指南及其对成果评估的影响》。
“ms框架”是“老年人友好型健康系统”(AFHS)运动的基础。虽然该框架是基于每个M的独立证据,但作为一组实践时对结果的影响证据有限。一项综合措施可以捕捉到包括4Ms在内的许多护理过程的遵守情况,这是缩小证据差距的必要但复杂的组成部分。我们提供了一个导航指南,解决了开发基于医院的4Ms护理复合度量的关键考虑因素。医疗保健改进研究所将4m框架作为一套最低限度的评估和行动护理流程进行操作。在开发住院患者4Ms依从性的复合测量时,我们提供了一个4步框架,并讨论了与复合测量类型(例如,连续的,二分类的)以及包含这些护理过程的Ms内部和跨Ms的同步性相关的考虑因素。在一家大型学术医院的4m实施中,我们使用真实世界的电子健康记录数据捕获护理过程依从性,说明了注意事项,并报告了对样本量和复合测量评分的影响。我们还提出了我们所选择的复合测量方法——一种二分法测量方法,描述了在所有就诊级流程(在医院就诊期间只需要完成一次的流程)被遵循,并且在至少50%的住院天数内遵循全天和轮班级流程时的4Ms护理。虽然在AFHS运动的早期阶段没有单一的、标准的方法来创建4Ms组合,但随着组织开发他们的测量方法,我们的指南和我们建议的考虑因素应该有助于告知这一过程,并支持有意义的测量进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信