Translation and interrater reliability of the structured interview for the extended glasgow outcome scale among Moroccan patients with traumatic brain injury

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Neurochirurgie Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.neuchi.2025.101658

Younes Iderdar, Soumia Marzouk, Nadia Al Wachami, Maryem Arraji, Karima Boumendil, Yassmine Mourajid, Amina Aquil, Elmadani Saad, Mohamed Chahboune

{"title":"Translation and interrater reliability of the structured interview for the extended glasgow outcome scale among Moroccan patients with traumatic brain injury","authors":"Younes Iderdar, Soumia Marzouk, Nadia Al Wachami, Maryem Arraji, Karima Boumendil, Yassmine Mourajid, Amina Aquil, Elmadani Saad, Mohamed Chahboune","doi":"10.1016/j.neuchi.2025.101658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) is a commonly used assessment tool to evaluate the outcome following traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aims to evaluate the applicability of the GOSE structured interview in the Moroccan context and to examine its reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective validation study, we assessed the inter-rater reliability of GOSE scoring for 123 TBI patients who attended Avicenna University Hospital's outpatient unit. Interrater agreement of the GOSE was assessed, with Cohen's weighted κ, between the rater with the structured interview and the rater without the structured interview and between the rater specialized in TBI and the non-specialized rater.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The findings demonstrated a high level of agreement (weighted kappa = 0.96) between the rater specialized in TBI and the non-specialized rater with (p < 0.001) and a high level of agreement (weighted kappa = 0.85) between the rater with the structured interview and the neurosurgeon without the structured interview. The Moroccan version is capable of assessing the GOSE Score at a level similar to the original version.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The use of this version has the potential to expedite the process of evaluating outcomes in patients with TBI in both clinical practice and research settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51141,"journal":{"name":"Neurochirurgie","volume":"71 3","pages":"Article 101658"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurochirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028377025000311","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) is a commonly used assessment tool to evaluate the outcome following traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aims to evaluate the applicability of the GOSE structured interview in the Moroccan context and to examine its reliability.

Methods

In this prospective validation study, we assessed the inter-rater reliability of GOSE scoring for 123 TBI patients who attended Avicenna University Hospital's outpatient unit. Interrater agreement of the GOSE was assessed, with Cohen's weighted κ, between the rater with the structured interview and the rater without the structured interview and between the rater specialized in TBI and the non-specialized rater.

Results

The findings demonstrated a high level of agreement (weighted kappa = 0.96) between the rater specialized in TBI and the non-specialized rater with (p < 0.001) and a high level of agreement (weighted kappa = 0.85) between the rater with the structured interview and the neurosurgeon without the structured interview. The Moroccan version is capable of assessing the GOSE Score at a level similar to the original version.

Conclusion

The use of this version has the potential to expedite the process of evaluating outcomes in patients with TBI in both clinical practice and research settings.

查看原文本刊更多论文

摩洛哥外伤性脑损伤患者扩展格拉斯哥结果量表结构化访谈的翻译和翻译者信度。

目的：扩展格拉斯哥预后量表（GOSE）是一种常用的评估工具，用于评估创伤性脑损伤（TBI）后的预后。本研究旨在评估摩洛哥背景下GOSE结构化访谈的适用性，并检查其可靠性。方法：在这项前瞻性验证研究中，我们评估了在阿维森纳大学医院门诊就诊的123名TBI患者的GOSE评分的评分者间信度。采用科恩加权κ (Cohen's weighted κ)，对采用结构化访谈的评分者与不采用结构化访谈的评分者之间，以及专门从事TBI的评分者与非专业评分者之间的GOSE一致性进行评估。结果：研究结果表明，专门从事TBI的评分者和非专业评分者之间的一致性很高（加权kappa = 0.96）。结论：在临床实践和研究环境中，使用该版本有可能加快评估TBI患者预后的过程。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Neurochirurgie 医学-临床神经学

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

6.20%

发文量

100

审稿时长

29 days

期刊介绍： Neurochirurgie publishes articles on treatment, teaching and research, neurosurgery training and the professional aspects of our discipline, and also the history and progress of neurosurgery. It focuses on pathologies of the head, spine and central and peripheral nervous systems and their vascularization. All aspects of the specialty are dealt with: trauma, tumor, degenerative disease, infection, vascular pathology, and radiosurgery, and pediatrics. Transversal studies are also welcome: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurology, neuropediatrics, psychiatry, neuropsychology, physical medicine and neurologic rehabilitation, neuro-anesthesia, neurologic intensive care, neuroradiology, functional exploration, neuropathology, neuro-ophthalmology, otoneurology, maxillofacial surgery, neuro-endocrinology and spine surgery. Technical and methodological aspects are also taken onboard: diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, methods for assessing results, epidemiology, surgical, interventional and radiological techniques, simulations and pathophysiological hypotheses, and educational tools. The editorial board may refuse submissions that fail to meet the journal''s aims and scope; such studies will not be peer-reviewed, and the editor in chief will promptly inform the corresponding author, so as not to delay submission to a more suitable journal. With a view to attracting an international audience of both readers and writers, Neurochirurgie especially welcomes articles in English, and gives priority to original studies. Other kinds of article - reviews, case reports, technical notes and meta-analyses - are equally published. Every year, a special edition is dedicated to the topic selected by the French Society of Neurosurgery for its annual report.