Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the prescribing pattern of oral anticoagulants in the English primary care setting: a population-based segmented interrupted time series analysis of over 53 million individuals.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Amanj Kurdi, Abdulaziz Albutti, Omeed Darweesh, Karwan M Amen, Kirmanj Baker, Hardee Karwi, Brian Godman
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the prescribing pattern of oral anticoagulants in the English primary care setting: a population-based segmented interrupted time series analysis of over 53 million individuals.","authors":"Amanj Kurdi, Abdulaziz Albutti, Omeed Darweesh, Karwan M Amen, Kirmanj Baker, Hardee Karwi, Brian Godman","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2473613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery, impacting oral anticoagulants (OAC) prescribing due to increased thromboembolic risks, Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, and guidelines favoring Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin. Previous studies were limited to short-term analyses.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A segmented interrupted time series analysis was conducted using the English primary care Prescription Cost Analysis data from March/2018-March/2024 to assess the impact of the first and second COVID-19 lockdowns in March and November 2020, respectively. Trends in OAC utilisation were measured using number of items per 1,000 inhabitants (NIT) and defined daily dose per 1,000 inhabitants per day (DTD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, oral anticoagulants prescribing increased significantly. Pre-pandemic, both NIT (β<sub>1</sub>: 0.09; 95%CI: 0.02, 0.16) and DTD (β<sub>1</sub>:0.13; 95%CI: 0.09, 0.16) showed positive trends. Post-first lockdown, DTD slope declined significantly (β<sub>3</sub>:-0.22; 95%CI: -0.42, -0.03). Post-second lockdown, DTD rose in both immediate level (β<sub>4</sub>:1.39; 95%CI: 0.34, 2.45) and slope (β<sub>5</sub>: 0.20; 95%CI: 0.0015, 0.39). Warfarin usage declined initially but rebounded, while DOACs, particularly apixaban, increased substantially (β<sub>4</sub>:0.96; 95%CI: 0.11, 1.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted oral anticoagulant prescribing patterns in England. While DOAC utilisation continued to rise, warfarin use declined significantly post-first lockdown but rebounded after the second lockdown.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"237-246"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2025.2473613","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery, impacting oral anticoagulants (OAC) prescribing due to increased thromboembolic risks, Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, and guidelines favoring Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin. Previous studies were limited to short-term analyses.

Research design and methods: A segmented interrupted time series analysis was conducted using the English primary care Prescription Cost Analysis data from March/2018-March/2024 to assess the impact of the first and second COVID-19 lockdowns in March and November 2020, respectively. Trends in OAC utilisation were measured using number of items per 1,000 inhabitants (NIT) and defined daily dose per 1,000 inhabitants per day (DTD).

Results: Overall, oral anticoagulants prescribing increased significantly. Pre-pandemic, both NIT (β1: 0.09; 95%CI: 0.02, 0.16) and DTD (β1:0.13; 95%CI: 0.09, 0.16) showed positive trends. Post-first lockdown, DTD slope declined significantly (β3:-0.22; 95%CI: -0.42, -0.03). Post-second lockdown, DTD rose in both immediate level (β4:1.39; 95%CI: 0.34, 2.45) and slope (β5: 0.20; 95%CI: 0.0015, 0.39). Warfarin usage declined initially but rebounded, while DOACs, particularly apixaban, increased substantially (β4:0.96; 95%CI: 0.11, 1.81).

Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted oral anticoagulant prescribing patterns in England. While DOAC utilisation continued to rise, warfarin use declined significantly post-first lockdown but rebounded after the second lockdown.

COVID-19大流行对英国初级保健机构口服抗凝剂处方模式的影响:对5300多万人进行的基于人群的分段中断时间序列分析
背景:COVID-19大流行扰乱了医疗服务,影响了口服抗凝剂(OAC)的处方,原因是血栓栓塞风险增加、疫苗诱导的免疫性血栓性血小板减少症,以及指南更倾向于直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)而不是华法林。以前的研究仅限于短期分析。研究设计和方法:利用2018年3月至2024年3月英国初级保健处方成本分析数据进行分段中断时间序列分析,评估分别于2020年3月和11月进行的第一次和第二次COVID-19封锁的影响。使用每1000名居民的物品数量(NIT)和每1000名居民每天的定义日剂量(DTD)来衡量OAC利用的趋势。结果:总体而言,口服抗凝剂处方明显增加。大流行前,两者的NIT (β 1:0 .09;95%CI: 0.02, 0.16)和DTD (β1:0.13;95%CI: 0.09, 0.16)呈阳性趋势。首次锁定后,DTD斜率显著下降(β3:-0.22;95%ci: -0.42, -0.03)。第二秒锁定后,DTD立即上升(β4:1.39;95%CI: 0.34, 2.45)和斜率(β5: 0.20;95%ci: 0.0015, 0.39)。华法林的使用最初下降,但随后反弹,而doac,特别是阿哌沙班,大幅增加(β4:0.96;95%ci: 0.11, 1.81)。结论:COVID-19大流行显著影响了英国口服抗凝血药的处方模式。虽然DOAC的使用率继续上升,但华法林的使用率在第一次封城后显著下降,但在第二次封城后出现反弹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信