Safety of in-hospital delay of appendectomy – a propensity score–matched analysis of 4900 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for suspected appendicitis
Andrea Mair , Stefan Schiele , Lena Anthuber , Michael Hoffmann , Gernot Müller , Matthias Anthuber , Matthias C. Schrempf
{"title":"Safety of in-hospital delay of appendectomy – a propensity score–matched analysis of 4900 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for suspected appendicitis","authors":"Andrea Mair , Stefan Schiele , Lena Anthuber , Michael Hoffmann , Gernot Müller , Matthias Anthuber , Matthias C. Schrempf","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Historically, urgent surgery was advocated in patients with suspected appendicitis because of the risk of perforation and possible complications. Although recent studies have shown that it is safe to delay surgery under certain circumstances, many studies do not report adjusted data and exclude patients based on risk factors. Furthermore, it is unclear whether an ultrasound-based diagnostic workup is sufficient to safely delay surgery. This large retrospective study aimed to analyze the risk-adjusted association between delayed appendectomy and perforation and complication rates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected appendicitis at a single institution were reviewed and analyzed. The investigated outcomes were perforation and complication rates. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to create equal groups regarding confounding factors, and multivariate analysis was performed to control for risk factors and to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for in-hospital delay.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between January 2008 and June 2023, 4900 patients underwent appendectomy for suspected appendicitis. Ultrasound imaging was performed in 4754 patients. Multivariate analysis of PS-matched data showed no association between a waiting time of >12 h and perforation rate (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.67–1.31; <em>P</em> =.69) or complication rate (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.62–1.30; <em>P</em> =.56). Similar results were obtained for a waiting time of 18 h and perforation rate (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.48–1.56; <em>P</em> =.88) or complication rate (adjusted OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.57–1.68; <em>P</em> =.93).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This large PS-matched analysis showed that it is safe to delay surgery by 12 and 18 h, even when the diagnostic workup is based on ultrasound. In patients with risk factors for complications, postponement of the procedure can be considered if it can improve overall conditions or allow the procedure to be performed with a higher level of expertise.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"29 4","pages":"Article 102003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X25000629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Historically, urgent surgery was advocated in patients with suspected appendicitis because of the risk of perforation and possible complications. Although recent studies have shown that it is safe to delay surgery under certain circumstances, many studies do not report adjusted data and exclude patients based on risk factors. Furthermore, it is unclear whether an ultrasound-based diagnostic workup is sufficient to safely delay surgery. This large retrospective study aimed to analyze the risk-adjusted association between delayed appendectomy and perforation and complication rates.
Methods
Data from consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected appendicitis at a single institution were reviewed and analyzed. The investigated outcomes were perforation and complication rates. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to create equal groups regarding confounding factors, and multivariate analysis was performed to control for risk factors and to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for in-hospital delay.
Results
Between January 2008 and June 2023, 4900 patients underwent appendectomy for suspected appendicitis. Ultrasound imaging was performed in 4754 patients. Multivariate analysis of PS-matched data showed no association between a waiting time of >12 h and perforation rate (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.67–1.31; P =.69) or complication rate (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.62–1.30; P =.56). Similar results were obtained for a waiting time of 18 h and perforation rate (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.48–1.56; P =.88) or complication rate (adjusted OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.57–1.68; P =.93).
Conclusion
This large PS-matched analysis showed that it is safe to delay surgery by 12 and 18 h, even when the diagnostic workup is based on ultrasound. In patients with risk factors for complications, postponement of the procedure can be considered if it can improve overall conditions or allow the procedure to be performed with a higher level of expertise.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.