Health Care Professionals' Views and Practices Regarding Bereavement Support.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jennifer McAdam, Jeneva Gularte-Rinaldo, Steven Kim, Alyssa Erikson
{"title":"Health Care Professionals' Views and Practices Regarding Bereavement Support.","authors":"Jennifer McAdam, Jeneva Gularte-Rinaldo, Steven Kim, Alyssa Erikson","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2025717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because the death of a loved one is distressing for families, bereavement support is recommended for high-quality end-of-life care. Although health care professionals provide support during the death, many do not routinely follow up with bereaved families.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe and compare how health care professionals view and provide bereavement support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, cross-sectional study assessed registered nurses, physicians, social workers, respiratory therapists, and unlicensed assistive personnel working in the intensive care unit, step-down unit, and emergency department. Health care professionals completed a survey assessing their views, practices, and training in providing bereavement support to families. Descriptive statistics and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to describe and compare the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 123 health care professionals, 67.5% were registered nurses and 78% were female. Most (64.2%) supported families at the time of death; however, only 6.5% followed up with bereaved families in the weeks after the death. Physicians, social workers, and registered nurses provided bereavement support more often than unlicensed assistive personnel and respiratory therapists did (P = .001). Only 29.3% were very comfortable providing support to bereaved families. Respiratory therapists were less comfortable than other health care professionals (P = .002). Most health care professionals (54.5%) wanted formal training on providing bereavement support. The main barriers to providing bereavement support included lack of training, time, and resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding health care professionals' views and practices on providing bereavement support may help inform the development of appropriate educational materials, interventions, and protocols around bereavement support.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"34 2","pages":"84-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2025717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Because the death of a loved one is distressing for families, bereavement support is recommended for high-quality end-of-life care. Although health care professionals provide support during the death, many do not routinely follow up with bereaved families.

Objectives: To describe and compare how health care professionals view and provide bereavement support.

Methods: This prospective, cross-sectional study assessed registered nurses, physicians, social workers, respiratory therapists, and unlicensed assistive personnel working in the intensive care unit, step-down unit, and emergency department. Health care professionals completed a survey assessing their views, practices, and training in providing bereavement support to families. Descriptive statistics and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to describe and compare the groups.

Results: Among 123 health care professionals, 67.5% were registered nurses and 78% were female. Most (64.2%) supported families at the time of death; however, only 6.5% followed up with bereaved families in the weeks after the death. Physicians, social workers, and registered nurses provided bereavement support more often than unlicensed assistive personnel and respiratory therapists did (P = .001). Only 29.3% were very comfortable providing support to bereaved families. Respiratory therapists were less comfortable than other health care professionals (P = .002). Most health care professionals (54.5%) wanted formal training on providing bereavement support. The main barriers to providing bereavement support included lack of training, time, and resources.

Conclusions: Understanding health care professionals' views and practices on providing bereavement support may help inform the development of appropriate educational materials, interventions, and protocols around bereavement support.

医疗保健专业人员对丧亲支持的看法和做法。
背景:因为一个亲人的死亡是痛苦的家庭,丧亲支持被推荐为高质量的临终关怀。虽然卫生保健专业人员在死亡期间提供支持,但许多人并不定期跟进失去亲人的家庭。目的:描述和比较卫生保健专业人员如何看待和提供丧亲支持。方法:这项前瞻性横断面研究评估了在重症监护室、减员病房和急诊科工作的注册护士、医生、社会工作者、呼吸治疗师和无证辅助人员。卫生保健专业人员完成了一项调查,评估他们在向家庭提供丧亲支持方面的观点、做法和培训。使用描述性统计和Kruskal-Wallis检验来描述和比较各组。结果:123名卫生专业人员中,注册护士占67.5%,女性占78%。大多数人(64.2%)在死亡时支持家庭;然而,只有6.5%的人在死亡后的几周内对死者家属进行了随访。医生、社工和注册护士比无证辅助人员和呼吸治疗师更常提供丧亲支持(P = .001)。只有29.3%的人愿意为丧亲者家属提供支持。呼吸治疗师比其他卫生保健专业人员更不舒服(P = 0.002)。大多数卫生保健专业人员(54.5%)希望接受关于提供丧亲支持的正式培训。提供丧亲支持的主要障碍包括缺乏培训、时间和资源。结论:了解卫生保健专业人员对提供丧亲支持的看法和做法可能有助于制定适当的教育材料、干预措施和有关丧亲支持的协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信