Gender inequality in intergenerational contact after parental separation in the digital era

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Marco Tosi, Bruno Arpino
{"title":"Gender inequality in intergenerational contact after parental separation in the digital era","authors":"Marco Tosi,&nbsp;Bruno Arpino","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The goal of this brief report is to analyze parent-adult child contact frequency in intact and non-intact families by focusing on parent and child gender and the type of contact.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Parental separation increases gender differences in parent–child relationships, with separated fathers having less frequent contact with their adult children compared to separated mothers. We investigate whether the father–mother gap in post-separation contact varies according to parent–child gender mismatch and the type of contact, that is, face-to-face, phone, or digital (e.g., via video calls).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We use data on Italian families from the Family and Social Subjects survey to examine parent–child contact frequency among 6770 adult children aged 30–55 (11,041 parent–child dyads). We estimate random and fixed effects models on the probability of having frequent contact with biological parents in intact and non-intact families (parental separation before age 18).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fathers' reduced contact frequency compared to mothers is particularly evident with daughters, more pronounced in face-to-face and phone contact than in digital contact, and greater among younger daughters at the time of separation. Gender differences in phone and digital contact are larger for fathers who have also less frequent face-to-face contact compared to mothers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We interpret these findings by focusing on the centrality of mother–daughter ties and the loyalty that children have with the same-gender parent. We also suggest that different types of contact reinforce gender differences between parents and may lead to a polarization of older parents with “strong” and “weak” family ties.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 2","pages":"824-839"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.13037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The goal of this brief report is to analyze parent-adult child contact frequency in intact and non-intact families by focusing on parent and child gender and the type of contact.

Background

Parental separation increases gender differences in parent–child relationships, with separated fathers having less frequent contact with their adult children compared to separated mothers. We investigate whether the father–mother gap in post-separation contact varies according to parent–child gender mismatch and the type of contact, that is, face-to-face, phone, or digital (e.g., via video calls).

Method

We use data on Italian families from the Family and Social Subjects survey to examine parent–child contact frequency among 6770 adult children aged 30–55 (11,041 parent–child dyads). We estimate random and fixed effects models on the probability of having frequent contact with biological parents in intact and non-intact families (parental separation before age 18).

Results

Fathers' reduced contact frequency compared to mothers is particularly evident with daughters, more pronounced in face-to-face and phone contact than in digital contact, and greater among younger daughters at the time of separation. Gender differences in phone and digital contact are larger for fathers who have also less frequent face-to-face contact compared to mothers.

Conclusion

We interpret these findings by focusing on the centrality of mother–daughter ties and the loyalty that children have with the same-gender parent. We also suggest that different types of contact reinforce gender differences between parents and may lead to a polarization of older parents with “strong” and “weak” family ties.

Abstract Image

数字时代父母分离后代际交往中的性别不平等
目的分析完整家庭和非完整家庭中父母与成人子女接触的频率,重点分析父母与儿童的性别和接触类型。父母分居增加了亲子关系中的性别差异,与分居的母亲相比,分居的父亲与成年子女的联系更少。我们调查了父母与子女的性别不匹配和接触类型(面对面、电话或数字(如视频通话))是否会影响分离后接触的父亲与母亲差距。方法采用意大利家庭和社会调查的数据,对6770名年龄在30-55岁的成年子女(11041对亲子对)进行亲子接触频率分析。我们估计了在完整和非完整家庭(父母在18岁之前分居)中与亲生父母频繁接触的概率的随机和固定效应模型。结果与母亲相比,父亲与女儿的联系频率减少尤其明显,在面对面和电话联系中比在数字联系中更为明显,在小女儿分离时更为明显。与母亲相比,父亲在电话和数字联系方面的性别差异更大,因为他们面对面联系的频率也更低。结论我们通过关注母女关系的中心性和孩子对同性父母的忠诚度来解释这些发现。我们还认为,不同类型的接触强化了父母之间的性别差异,并可能导致家庭关系“强”和“弱”的老年父母两极分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信