Using Self-Scheduling to Improve Screening Mammography Completion Rates

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Gillean Cortes DO , Wen-Pin Chen MS , Ziogas Aryagus PhD , Ali Rashidi MD , Irene Tsai MD , Gelareh Sadigh MD
{"title":"Using Self-Scheduling to Improve Screening Mammography Completion Rates","authors":"Gillean Cortes DO ,&nbsp;Wen-Pin Chen MS ,&nbsp;Ziogas Aryagus PhD ,&nbsp;Ali Rashidi MD ,&nbsp;Irene Tsai MD ,&nbsp;Gelareh Sadigh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Self-scheduling has the potential to enhance convenience and patient engagement. We compared outpatient screening mammography completion rates before and after implementing an online self-scheduling system between patients who use self-scheduling versus traditional scheduling.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In February 2021, a self-scheduling process was implemented at an institutional level through the Epic MyChart online portal, allowing patients to self-schedule screening mammography. This retrospective cohort study included women aged 18 and over who scheduled outpatient screening mammography in a tertiary health care facility from October 1, 2017, to June 30, 2023, had at least one encounter during the pre-implementation phase and one encounter during the postimplementation period, and only used one scheduling method (self-scheduling or traditional scheduling) in the postimplementation period. Difference-in-difference analyses were conducted to compare screening mammography completion rates between patients who used traditional versus self-scheduling in the postimplementation period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In all, 29,893 screening mammography were scheduled by 7,203 patients (mean age: 58.1 years; 70.0% White, 18.2% Asian, 1.8% Black, and 19.5% Hispanic). The overall mammography completion rate in pre-implementation period was 78.9% and increased to 79.8% in the postimplementation period. Using difference-in-difference estimator, the completion rates in the self-scheduling cohort was 8.4 percentage point (95% confidence interval, 5.2-11.6) higher than traditional scheduling. The change in screening mammography completion rate from the postimplementation to pre-implementation period was +8.5 percentage point (88.1% postimplementation versus 79.6% pre-implementation) for the self-scheduling cohort and +0.1 percentage point (80.8% postimplementation versus 80.7% pre-implementation) for the traditional scheduling cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Self-scheduling was linked to increased screening mammography completion rates postimplementation when compared to traditional scheduling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":"22 3","pages":"Pages 307-314"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144024008421","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Self-scheduling has the potential to enhance convenience and patient engagement. We compared outpatient screening mammography completion rates before and after implementing an online self-scheduling system between patients who use self-scheduling versus traditional scheduling.

Methods

In February 2021, a self-scheduling process was implemented at an institutional level through the Epic MyChart online portal, allowing patients to self-schedule screening mammography. This retrospective cohort study included women aged 18 and over who scheduled outpatient screening mammography in a tertiary health care facility from October 1, 2017, to June 30, 2023, had at least one encounter during the pre-implementation phase and one encounter during the postimplementation period, and only used one scheduling method (self-scheduling or traditional scheduling) in the postimplementation period. Difference-in-difference analyses were conducted to compare screening mammography completion rates between patients who used traditional versus self-scheduling in the postimplementation period.

Results

In all, 29,893 screening mammography were scheduled by 7,203 patients (mean age: 58.1 years; 70.0% White, 18.2% Asian, 1.8% Black, and 19.5% Hispanic). The overall mammography completion rate in pre-implementation period was 78.9% and increased to 79.8% in the postimplementation period. Using difference-in-difference estimator, the completion rates in the self-scheduling cohort was 8.4 percentage point (95% confidence interval, 5.2-11.6) higher than traditional scheduling. The change in screening mammography completion rate from the postimplementation to pre-implementation period was +8.5 percentage point (88.1% postimplementation versus 79.6% pre-implementation) for the self-scheduling cohort and +0.1 percentage point (80.8% postimplementation versus 80.7% pre-implementation) for the traditional scheduling cohort.

Conclusion

Self-scheduling was linked to increased screening mammography completion rates postimplementation when compared to traditional scheduling.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Journal of the American College of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.90%
发文量
312
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信