Gillean Cortes DO , Wen-Pin Chen MS , Ziogas Aryagus PhD , Ali Rashidi MD , Irene Tsai MD , Gelareh Sadigh MD
{"title":"Using Self-Scheduling to Improve Screening Mammography Completion Rates","authors":"Gillean Cortes DO , Wen-Pin Chen MS , Ziogas Aryagus PhD , Ali Rashidi MD , Irene Tsai MD , Gelareh Sadigh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Self-scheduling has the potential to enhance convenience and patient engagement. We compared outpatient screening mammography completion rates before and after implementing an online self-scheduling system between patients who use self-scheduling versus traditional scheduling.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In February 2021, a self-scheduling process was implemented at an institutional level through the Epic MyChart online portal, allowing patients to self-schedule screening mammography. This retrospective cohort study included women aged 18 and over who scheduled outpatient screening mammography in a tertiary health care facility from October 1, 2017, to June 30, 2023, had at least one encounter during the pre-implementation phase and one encounter during the postimplementation period, and only used one scheduling method (self-scheduling or traditional scheduling) in the postimplementation period. Difference-in-difference analyses were conducted to compare screening mammography completion rates between patients who used traditional versus self-scheduling in the postimplementation period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In all, 29,893 screening mammography were scheduled by 7,203 patients (mean age: 58.1 years; 70.0% White, 18.2% Asian, 1.8% Black, and 19.5% Hispanic). The overall mammography completion rate in pre-implementation period was 78.9% and increased to 79.8% in the postimplementation period. Using difference-in-difference estimator, the completion rates in the self-scheduling cohort was 8.4 percentage point (95% confidence interval, 5.2-11.6) higher than traditional scheduling. The change in screening mammography completion rate from the postimplementation to pre-implementation period was +8.5 percentage point (88.1% postimplementation versus 79.6% pre-implementation) for the self-scheduling cohort and +0.1 percentage point (80.8% postimplementation versus 80.7% pre-implementation) for the traditional scheduling cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Self-scheduling was linked to increased screening mammography completion rates postimplementation when compared to traditional scheduling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":"22 3","pages":"Pages 307-314"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144024008421","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Self-scheduling has the potential to enhance convenience and patient engagement. We compared outpatient screening mammography completion rates before and after implementing an online self-scheduling system between patients who use self-scheduling versus traditional scheduling.
Methods
In February 2021, a self-scheduling process was implemented at an institutional level through the Epic MyChart online portal, allowing patients to self-schedule screening mammography. This retrospective cohort study included women aged 18 and over who scheduled outpatient screening mammography in a tertiary health care facility from October 1, 2017, to June 30, 2023, had at least one encounter during the pre-implementation phase and one encounter during the postimplementation period, and only used one scheduling method (self-scheduling or traditional scheduling) in the postimplementation period. Difference-in-difference analyses were conducted to compare screening mammography completion rates between patients who used traditional versus self-scheduling in the postimplementation period.
Results
In all, 29,893 screening mammography were scheduled by 7,203 patients (mean age: 58.1 years; 70.0% White, 18.2% Asian, 1.8% Black, and 19.5% Hispanic). The overall mammography completion rate in pre-implementation period was 78.9% and increased to 79.8% in the postimplementation period. Using difference-in-difference estimator, the completion rates in the self-scheduling cohort was 8.4 percentage point (95% confidence interval, 5.2-11.6) higher than traditional scheduling. The change in screening mammography completion rate from the postimplementation to pre-implementation period was +8.5 percentage point (88.1% postimplementation versus 79.6% pre-implementation) for the self-scheduling cohort and +0.1 percentage point (80.8% postimplementation versus 80.7% pre-implementation) for the traditional scheduling cohort.
Conclusion
Self-scheduling was linked to increased screening mammography completion rates postimplementation when compared to traditional scheduling.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.