Are we truly ready for what is coming? A reflection on supply chain resilience in face of megatrends

IF 9.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Guilherme Luz Tortorella , Tarcisio Abreu Saurin , Moacir Godinho Filho , Rafaela Alfalla-Luque , Andrea Trianni
{"title":"Are we truly ready for what is coming? A reflection on supply chain resilience in face of megatrends","authors":"Guilherme Luz Tortorella ,&nbsp;Tarcisio Abreu Saurin ,&nbsp;Moacir Godinho Filho ,&nbsp;Rafaela Alfalla-Luque ,&nbsp;Andrea Trianni","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Supply chains (SCs) have increasingly faced major disruptive events that defy existing management approaches, affecting their processes in both the short and long term. Current megatrends (e.g., digital transformation, aging population, growing urbanization, shifts in consumer demands, geopolitical tension, depletion of natural resources, climate change) have impacted organizations, requiring managers to rethink the foundational assumptions and develop new capabilities to obtain more resilient SCs. In this study, we analyse the readiness of SCs for coping with disruptions caused by seven megatrends. Based on extensive debates among the authors and supported by a narrative literature review, we framed this analysis according to four potentials of resilient systems (monitoring, anticipation, responding, and learning) and three types of SC structure (linear, networked, and hub-and-spoke). We debated and pooled our viewpoints to identify readiness levels for coping with each megatrend, which allowed the formulation of research propositions to be further investigated. Overall, the readiness of all resilience potentials varies across megatrends and SC structures, although the potentials to anticipate, respond and learn seem to be less developed (either lowly or moderately ready) than monitoring, especially when considering disruptions caused by changing demographics and climate change. Further, linear SCs appear to be more vulnerable to most megatrends. Finally, we outline opportunities for further investigation regarding SCs resilience to megatrends’ disruptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"283 ","pages":"Article 109585"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325000702","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supply chains (SCs) have increasingly faced major disruptive events that defy existing management approaches, affecting their processes in both the short and long term. Current megatrends (e.g., digital transformation, aging population, growing urbanization, shifts in consumer demands, geopolitical tension, depletion of natural resources, climate change) have impacted organizations, requiring managers to rethink the foundational assumptions and develop new capabilities to obtain more resilient SCs. In this study, we analyse the readiness of SCs for coping with disruptions caused by seven megatrends. Based on extensive debates among the authors and supported by a narrative literature review, we framed this analysis according to four potentials of resilient systems (monitoring, anticipation, responding, and learning) and three types of SC structure (linear, networked, and hub-and-spoke). We debated and pooled our viewpoints to identify readiness levels for coping with each megatrend, which allowed the formulation of research propositions to be further investigated. Overall, the readiness of all resilience potentials varies across megatrends and SC structures, although the potentials to anticipate, respond and learn seem to be less developed (either lowly or moderately ready) than monitoring, especially when considering disruptions caused by changing demographics and climate change. Further, linear SCs appear to be more vulnerable to most megatrends. Finally, we outline opportunities for further investigation regarding SCs resilience to megatrends’ disruptions.
我们真的准备好迎接即将到来的一切了吗?大趋势下供应链弹性的思考
供应链(sc)越来越多地面临着重大的破坏性事件,这些事件违背了现有的管理方法,在短期和长期内影响着他们的过程。当前的大趋势(如数字化转型、人口老龄化、城市化进程、消费者需求变化、地缘政治紧张局势、自然资源枯竭、气候变化)已经对组织产生了影响,要求管理者重新思考基本假设,并开发新的能力,以获得更具弹性的SCs。在本研究中,我们分析了服务提供商应对七个大趋势造成的中断的准备情况。基于作者之间的广泛争论,并在一篇叙述性文献综述的支持下,我们根据弹性系统的四种潜力(监测、预测、响应和学习)和三种类型的SC结构(线性、网络化和轮辐式)构建了这一分析。我们讨论并汇集了我们的观点,以确定应对每种大趋势的准备程度,从而可以进一步研究研究命题的制定。总体而言,所有复原力潜力的准备程度因大趋势和SC结构而异,尽管预测、响应和学习的潜力似乎不如监测那么发达(准备程度低或中等),特别是考虑到人口变化和气候变化造成的破坏。此外,线性SCs似乎更容易受到大多数大趋势的影响。最后,我们概述了进一步研究SCs对大趋势中断的恢复能力的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信