Challenging Conventional Diagnostic Methods by Comprehensive Molecular Diagnostics: A Nationwide Prospective Comparison in Children With ALL.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1200/PO-24-00788
Judith M Boer, Marco J Koudijs, Lennart A Kester, Edwin Sonneveld, Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa, Simone Snijder, Esme Waanders, Arjan Buijs, Valérie de Haas, Inge M van der Sluis, Rob Pieters, Monique L den Boer, Bastiaan B J Tops
{"title":"Challenging Conventional Diagnostic Methods by Comprehensive Molecular Diagnostics: A Nationwide Prospective Comparison in Children With ALL.","authors":"Judith M Boer, Marco J Koudijs, Lennart A Kester, Edwin Sonneveld, Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa, Simone Snijder, Esme Waanders, Arjan Buijs, Valérie de Haas, Inge M van der Sluis, Rob Pieters, Monique L den Boer, Bastiaan B J Tops","doi":"10.1200/PO-24-00788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Treatment stratification in ALL includes diverse (cyto)genetic aberrations, requiring diverse tests to yield conclusive data. We optimized the diagnostic workflow to detect all relevant aberrations with a limited number of tests in a clinically relevant time frame.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 467 consecutive patients with ALL (0-20 years), we compared RNA sequencing (RNAseq), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), karyotyping, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for technical success, concordance of results, and turnaround time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To detect stratifying fusions (<i>ETV6</i>::<i>RUNX1</i>, <i>BCR</i>::<i>ABL1</i>, ABL-class, <i>KMT2A</i>r, <i>TCF3</i>::<i>HLF</i>, <i>IGH</i>::<i>MYC</i>), RNAseq and FISH were conclusive for 97% and 96% of patients, respectively, with 99% concordance. RNAseq performed well in samples with a low leukemic cell percentage or low RNA quality. RT-PCR for six specific fusions was conclusive for >99% but false-negative for six patients with alternatively fused exons. RNAseq also detected gene fusions not yet used for stratification in 14% of B-cell precursor-ALL and 33% of T-ALL. For aneuploidies and intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21, SNP array gave a conclusive result in 99%, thereby outperforming karyotyping, which was conclusive for 64%. To identify deletions in eight stratifying genes/regions, SNP array was conclusive in 99% and MLPA in 95% of patients, with 98% concordance. The median turnaround times were 10 days for RNAseq, 9 days for FISH, 10 days for SNP array, and <7 days for MLPA and RT-PCR in this real-world prospective study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining RNAseq and SNP array outperformed current diagnostic tools to detect all stratifying genetic aberrations in ALL. The turnaround time is <15 days matching major treatment decision time points. Moreover, combining RNAseq and SNP array has the advantage of detecting new lesions for studies on prognosis and pathobiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400788"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11913173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-24-00788","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment stratification in ALL includes diverse (cyto)genetic aberrations, requiring diverse tests to yield conclusive data. We optimized the diagnostic workflow to detect all relevant aberrations with a limited number of tests in a clinically relevant time frame.

Methods: In 467 consecutive patients with ALL (0-20 years), we compared RNA sequencing (RNAseq), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), karyotyping, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for technical success, concordance of results, and turnaround time.

Results: To detect stratifying fusions (ETV6::RUNX1, BCR::ABL1, ABL-class, KMT2Ar, TCF3::HLF, IGH::MYC), RNAseq and FISH were conclusive for 97% and 96% of patients, respectively, with 99% concordance. RNAseq performed well in samples with a low leukemic cell percentage or low RNA quality. RT-PCR for six specific fusions was conclusive for >99% but false-negative for six patients with alternatively fused exons. RNAseq also detected gene fusions not yet used for stratification in 14% of B-cell precursor-ALL and 33% of T-ALL. For aneuploidies and intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21, SNP array gave a conclusive result in 99%, thereby outperforming karyotyping, which was conclusive for 64%. To identify deletions in eight stratifying genes/regions, SNP array was conclusive in 99% and MLPA in 95% of patients, with 98% concordance. The median turnaround times were 10 days for RNAseq, 9 days for FISH, 10 days for SNP array, and <7 days for MLPA and RT-PCR in this real-world prospective study.

Conclusion: Combining RNAseq and SNP array outperformed current diagnostic tools to detect all stratifying genetic aberrations in ALL. The turnaround time is <15 days matching major treatment decision time points. Moreover, combining RNAseq and SNP array has the advantage of detecting new lesions for studies on prognosis and pathobiology.

目的:ALL的治疗分层包括多种(细胞)基因畸变,需要进行多种检测才能得出结论性数据。我们对诊断工作流程进行了优化,以便在临床相关的时间内通过有限的检测项目检测出所有相关的畸变:方法:在467例连续的ALL患者(0-20岁)中,我们比较了RNA测序(RNAseq)、荧光原位杂交(FISH)、逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)、核型分析、单核苷酸多态性(SNP)阵列和多重连接依赖性探针扩增(MLPA)的技术成功率、结果一致性和周转时间:为检测分层融合(ETV6::RUNX1、BCR::ABL1、ABL-class、KMT2Ar、TCF3::HLF、IGH::MYC),RNAseq和FISH分别对97%和96%的患者具有确证作用,一致性达99%。在白血病细胞比例较低或 RNA 质量较低的样本中,RNAseq 的效果良好。对六种特定融合基因的 RT-PCR 检测结果显示,超过 99% 的患者为确诊,但有六名患者的外显子存在替代性融合,为假阴性。在 14% 的 B 细胞前体-ALL 和 33% 的 T-ALL 中,RNAseq 还检测到了尚未用于分层的基因融合。对于 21 号染色体的非整倍体和染色体内扩增,SNP 阵列可在 99% 的患者中得到确诊结果,因此优于核型分析,后者可在 64% 的患者中得到确诊结果。在确定 8 个分层基因/区域的缺失方面,99% 的患者通过 SNP 阵列得出结论,95% 的患者通过 MLPA 得出结论,一致性达到 98%。RNAseq 的中位周转时间为 10 天,FISH 为 9 天,SNP 阵列为 10 天:结合 RNAseq 和 SNP 阵列检测 ALL 中所有分层基因畸变的效果优于目前的诊断工具。周转时间为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信