Do images really do the talking?

Siddhanth U. Hegde, Adeep Hande, Ruba Priyadharshini, Sajeetha Thavareesan, Ratnasingam Sakuntharaj, Sathiyaraj Thangasamy, B. Bharathi, Bharathi Raja Chakravarthi
{"title":"Do images really do the talking?","authors":"Siddhanth U. Hegde,&nbsp;Adeep Hande,&nbsp;Ruba Priyadharshini,&nbsp;Sajeetha Thavareesan,&nbsp;Ratnasingam Sakuntharaj,&nbsp;Sathiyaraj Thangasamy,&nbsp;B. Bharathi,&nbsp;Bharathi Raja Chakravarthi","doi":"10.1007/s43674-025-00079-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A meme is a part of media created to share an opinion or emotion across the internet. Due to their popularity, memes have become the new form of communication on social media. However, they are used in harmful ways such as trolling and cyberbullying progressively due to their nature. Various data modelling methods create different possibilities in feature extraction and turn them into beneficial information. The variety of modalities included in data plays a significant part in predicting the results. We try to explore the significance of visual features of images in classifying memes. Memes are a blend of both image and text, where the text is embedded into the picture. We consider a meme to be trolling if the meme in any way tries to troll a particular individual, group, or organisation. We try to incorporate the memes as a troll and non-trolling memes based on their images and text. We evaluate if there is any major significance of the visual features for identifying whether a meme is trolling or not. Our work illustrates different textual analysis methods and contrasting multimodal approaches ranging from simple merging to cross attention to utilising both worlds’—visual and textual features. The fine-tuned cross-lingual language model, XLM, performed the best in textual analysis, and the multimodal transformer performs the best in multimodal analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72089,"journal":{"name":"Advances in computational intelligence","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43674-025-00079-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in computational intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43674-025-00079-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A meme is a part of media created to share an opinion or emotion across the internet. Due to their popularity, memes have become the new form of communication on social media. However, they are used in harmful ways such as trolling and cyberbullying progressively due to their nature. Various data modelling methods create different possibilities in feature extraction and turn them into beneficial information. The variety of modalities included in data plays a significant part in predicting the results. We try to explore the significance of visual features of images in classifying memes. Memes are a blend of both image and text, where the text is embedded into the picture. We consider a meme to be trolling if the meme in any way tries to troll a particular individual, group, or organisation. We try to incorporate the memes as a troll and non-trolling memes based on their images and text. We evaluate if there is any major significance of the visual features for identifying whether a meme is trolling or not. Our work illustrates different textual analysis methods and contrasting multimodal approaches ranging from simple merging to cross attention to utilising both worlds’—visual and textual features. The fine-tuned cross-lingual language model, XLM, performed the best in textual analysis, and the multimodal transformer performs the best in multimodal analysis.

图像真的能说话吗?
模因是媒体的一部分,用来在互联网上分享观点或情感。由于其受欢迎程度,表情包已经成为社交媒体上新的交流形式。然而,由于它们的性质,它们被越来越多地用于有害的方式,如拖钓和网络欺凌。不同的数据建模方法为特征提取创造了不同的可能性,并将其转化为有益的信息。数据中包含的各种模式在预测结果方面起着重要作用。我们试图探讨图像的视觉特征在模因分类中的意义。模因是图像和文本的混合体,文本嵌入到图片中。如果一个模因试图以任何方式“喷子”某个特定的个人、团体或组织,我们就认为这个模因是“喷子”。我们试着根据图片和文字将这些表情包分为喷子表情包和非喷子表情包。我们评估是否有任何重大意义的视觉特征,以确定是否恶搞或不。我们的工作展示了不同的文本分析方法和对比的多模态方法,从简单的合并到交叉注意,再到利用两个世界的视觉和文本特征。经过微调的跨语言模型XLM在文本分析中表现最好,而多模态转换器在多模态分析中表现最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信