Giancarlo Speranza, Sven Mischkewitz, Fouad Al-Noor, Bernhard Kainz
{"title":"Value of clinical review for AI-guided deep vein thrombosis diagnosis with ultrasound imaging by non-expert operators","authors":"Giancarlo Speranza, Sven Mischkewitz, Fouad Al-Noor, Bernhard Kainz","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01518-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) carries high morbidity, mortality, and costs globally. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) image acquisition by non-ultrasound-trained providers, supported by an AI-based guidance and remote image review system, is believed to improve the timeliness and cost-effectiveness of diagnosis. We examine a database of 381 patients with suspected DVT who underwent an AI-guided ultrasound scan by a non-ultrasound-trained nurse and an expert sonographer-performed standard compression ultrasound scan. Each AI-guided scan was reviewed remotely by blinded radiologists or blinded independent POCUS-certified American Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians. Remote reviewer and standard scan diagnoses were compared. The primary endpoint is AI-guidance system sensitivity with clinician review; secondary endpoints include specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, image quality, inter-observer image quality, and vein compressibility agreement. Data was analysed through the bootstrapping method, bootstrapping with a second reader for each scan, and a majority voting system. Eighty percent (<i>n</i> = 304) of scans were of sufficient diagnostic quality. Radiologist reviewer sensitivity ranged from 90%–95%, specificity from 74%–84%, NPV from 98%–99%, PPV from 30%–42%, and potential expert-led ultrasound scans avoided from 39%–50%. Inter-observer agreement for image quality was 0.15 and for compressibility 0.61. EM reviewer sensitivity ranged from 95%–98%, specificity from 97%–100%, NPV was 99%, PPV from 81%–100%, and potential expert-led ultrasound scans avoided from 29%–38%. Inter-observer agreement for image quality was 0.59 and for compressibility 0.67. Diagnosing lower extremity DVT through AI-guided image acquisition with clinician review is feasible. Performance is influenced by reviewer expertise. We find potential positive impacts on health economics, including safely avoiding expert-led ultrasound scans.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01518-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) carries high morbidity, mortality, and costs globally. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) image acquisition by non-ultrasound-trained providers, supported by an AI-based guidance and remote image review system, is believed to improve the timeliness and cost-effectiveness of diagnosis. We examine a database of 381 patients with suspected DVT who underwent an AI-guided ultrasound scan by a non-ultrasound-trained nurse and an expert sonographer-performed standard compression ultrasound scan. Each AI-guided scan was reviewed remotely by blinded radiologists or blinded independent POCUS-certified American Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians. Remote reviewer and standard scan diagnoses were compared. The primary endpoint is AI-guidance system sensitivity with clinician review; secondary endpoints include specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, image quality, inter-observer image quality, and vein compressibility agreement. Data was analysed through the bootstrapping method, bootstrapping with a second reader for each scan, and a majority voting system. Eighty percent (n = 304) of scans were of sufficient diagnostic quality. Radiologist reviewer sensitivity ranged from 90%–95%, specificity from 74%–84%, NPV from 98%–99%, PPV from 30%–42%, and potential expert-led ultrasound scans avoided from 39%–50%. Inter-observer agreement for image quality was 0.15 and for compressibility 0.61. EM reviewer sensitivity ranged from 95%–98%, specificity from 97%–100%, NPV was 99%, PPV from 81%–100%, and potential expert-led ultrasound scans avoided from 29%–38%. Inter-observer agreement for image quality was 0.59 and for compressibility 0.67. Diagnosing lower extremity DVT through AI-guided image acquisition with clinician review is feasible. Performance is influenced by reviewer expertise. We find potential positive impacts on health economics, including safely avoiding expert-led ultrasound scans.
期刊介绍:
npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics.
The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.