Barriers and facilitators influencing midwives' implementation of South Africa's maternal care guidelines in postnatal health: a scoping review.

Ngozichika Okeke, Roinah Ngunyulu
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators influencing midwives' implementation of South Africa's maternal care guidelines in postnatal health: a scoping review.","authors":"Ngozichika Okeke, Roinah Ngunyulu","doi":"10.1017/S1463423625000015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The implementation of South Africa's maternal care guidelines is still subpar, especially during the postnatal periods, despite midwives playing a key part in postnatal care for women and their newborns. This article aimed to pinpoint the obstacles to and enablers of midwives' roles in putting South Africa's maternal care recommendations for postnatal health into practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley method. Systematic searches were conducted using the PsycINFO, Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), PubMed, EBSCOhost web, and Google Scholar. The screening was guided by the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were analyzed using the Braun and Clarke method for thematic content analysis and included 22 articles. The quality of included studies was determined by Mixed Method Appraisal Tool and these were reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis for Scoping Review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a gap between inadequate postnatal care services provision and suboptimal implementation of maternal recommendations. Owing to a lack of basic knowledge about the guidelines, an absence of midwives in the maternity units, inadequate facilities and resources, a lack of drive and support, inadequate training of midwives in critical competencies, and poor information sharing and communication. Maintaining qualified midwives in the maternity units and providing them with training to increase their capacity, knowledge, and competencies on the guidelines' critical information for managing postnatal complications and providing high-quality care to women and their babies is necessary to effectively implement the recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The relative success in implementing maternal care guidelines in South Africa lies in the contextual consideration of these factors for the development of intersectoral healthcare packages, strengthening health system collaborations, and stakeholder partnerships to ameliorate maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"26 ","pages":"e16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The implementation of South Africa's maternal care guidelines is still subpar, especially during the postnatal periods, despite midwives playing a key part in postnatal care for women and their newborns. This article aimed to pinpoint the obstacles to and enablers of midwives' roles in putting South Africa's maternal care recommendations for postnatal health into practice.

Method: A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley method. Systematic searches were conducted using the PsycINFO, Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), PubMed, EBSCOhost web, and Google Scholar. The screening was guided by the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were analyzed using the Braun and Clarke method for thematic content analysis and included 22 articles. The quality of included studies was determined by Mixed Method Appraisal Tool and these were reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis for Scoping Review.

Results: There is a gap between inadequate postnatal care services provision and suboptimal implementation of maternal recommendations. Owing to a lack of basic knowledge about the guidelines, an absence of midwives in the maternity units, inadequate facilities and resources, a lack of drive and support, inadequate training of midwives in critical competencies, and poor information sharing and communication. Maintaining qualified midwives in the maternity units and providing them with training to increase their capacity, knowledge, and competencies on the guidelines' critical information for managing postnatal complications and providing high-quality care to women and their babies is necessary to effectively implement the recommendations.

Conclusion: The relative success in implementing maternal care guidelines in South Africa lies in the contextual consideration of these factors for the development of intersectoral healthcare packages, strengthening health system collaborations, and stakeholder partnerships to ameliorate maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality.

导言:尽管助产士在妇女及其新生儿的产后护理中发挥着关键作用,但南非孕产妇护理指南的执行情况仍不理想,尤其是在产后期间。本文旨在明确助产士在将南非孕产妇护理产后健康建议付诸实践方面所面临的障碍以及助产士发挥作用的促进因素:方法:按照 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的方法进行了范围界定审查。使用 PsycINFO、护理与联合健康(CINAHL)、PubMed、EBSCOhost web 和 Google Scholar 进行了系统检索。筛选以纳入和排除标准为指导。采用布劳恩和克拉克专题内容分析法对数据进行了分析,共纳入 22 篇文章。采用混合方法评估工具确定了纳入研究的质量,并根据《系统综述首选报告项目》和《范围界定综述的元分析》进行了报告:产后护理服务的提供不足与孕产妇建议的实施不理想之间存在差距。原因包括缺乏对指南的基本了解、产科缺乏助产士、设施和资源不足、缺乏动力和支持、助产士关键能力培训不足以及信息共享和沟通不畅。在产科保留合格的助产士,并为她们提供培训,以提高她们在处理产后并发症和为妇女及其婴儿提供优质护理方面的能力、知识和指南关键信息的能力,是有效实施建议的必要条件:结论:南非在实施孕产妇护理指南方面取得的相对成功在于,在制定跨部门一揽子医疗保健计划时考虑到了这些因素,加强了卫生系统的合作以及利益相关者之间的伙伴关系,从而降低了孕产妇和新生儿的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信