Impact of a 3-year transformational change project in family violence clinical response: Qualitative evaluation of the depth and breadth of knowledge in hospital clinicians by training level.

Kirsty Troy, Catherine Rushan, Toni D Withiel, Kim L Felmingham, Caroline A Fisher
{"title":"Impact of a 3-year transformational change project in family violence clinical response: Qualitative evaluation of the depth and breadth of knowledge in hospital clinicians by training level.","authors":"Kirsty Troy, Catherine Rushan, Toni D Withiel, Kim L Felmingham, Caroline A Fisher","doi":"10.1177/17455057241305264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the impact of different levels of training in family violence (no training, some training, clinical champions), on the clinician knowledge of key family violence response skills, using qualitative, survey obtained text-box responses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional, online, survey of hospital clinicians in a major trauma hospital was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Assisting Patient/Clients Experiencing Family Violence: Royal Melbourne Hospital Clinician Survey tool was utilised and open for clinicians to complete, anonymously over a 6-week period. Free-text survey responses were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred twenty-six clinical staff participated, 30% with no training, 52% with some training and 18% who were trained as clinical champions. A clear pattern was observed across training levels. Those with no training opted to demonstrate their family violence knowledge base less frequently. When they did, answers lacked specific information and details, showed limited knowledge of covert family violence indicators and provided a higher proportion of responses that did not align with best practice guidelines. Staff with some training showed a more sophisticated understanding in these areas. However, the quality of their responses did not match those of the clinical champions, who also provided an ongoing community of practice to further their skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing some training in family violence yields a higher degree of family violence knowledge in clinicians, relative to no training. However, the extra resourcing required to train and maintain a clinical champions model in family violence provides demonstratable benefits, via a more sophisticated and nuanced understanding of indicators, enquiry and disclosure response skills, that align with best practice guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"21 ","pages":"17455057241305264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057241305264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impact of different levels of training in family violence (no training, some training, clinical champions), on the clinician knowledge of key family violence response skills, using qualitative, survey obtained text-box responses.

Design: A cross-sectional, online, survey of hospital clinicians in a major trauma hospital was conducted.

Methods: The Assisting Patient/Clients Experiencing Family Violence: Royal Melbourne Hospital Clinician Survey tool was utilised and open for clinicians to complete, anonymously over a 6-week period. Free-text survey responses were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.

Results: Five hundred twenty-six clinical staff participated, 30% with no training, 52% with some training and 18% who were trained as clinical champions. A clear pattern was observed across training levels. Those with no training opted to demonstrate their family violence knowledge base less frequently. When they did, answers lacked specific information and details, showed limited knowledge of covert family violence indicators and provided a higher proportion of responses that did not align with best practice guidelines. Staff with some training showed a more sophisticated understanding in these areas. However, the quality of their responses did not match those of the clinical champions, who also provided an ongoing community of practice to further their skills.

Conclusions: Providing some training in family violence yields a higher degree of family violence knowledge in clinicians, relative to no training. However, the extra resourcing required to train and maintain a clinical champions model in family violence provides demonstratable benefits, via a more sophisticated and nuanced understanding of indicators, enquiry and disclosure response skills, that align with best practice guidelines.

研究目的本研究旨在利用定性调查获得的文本框回复,调查不同程度的家庭暴力培训(未接受过培训、接受过一些培训、临床冠军)对临床医生掌握主要家庭暴力应对技能的影响:设计:对一家大型创伤医院的临床医生进行横向在线调查:方法:协助遭受家庭暴力的患者/客户:方法:使用 "协助遭受家庭暴力的病人/患者:墨尔本皇家医院临床医生调查 "工具,并开放给临床医生在 6 周内匿名填写。采用归纳式主题分析方法对自由文本调查回复进行了分析:共有 526 名临床医务人员参与了调查,其中 30% 未接受过培训,52% 接受过一些培训,18% 接受过临床卫士培训。在不同的培训级别中观察到了一个明显的模式。没有接受过培训的人员较少选择展示他们的家庭暴力知识库。他们的回答缺乏具体信息和细节,对隐蔽性家庭暴力指标的了解有限,不符合最佳实践指南的回答比例较高。接受过一定培训的工作人员对这些方面的理解更为深刻。然而,他们的回答质量却无法与临床倡导者相提并论,因为临床倡导者还提供了一个持续的实践社区来提高他们的技能:结论:提供一些家庭暴力方面的培训比不提供培训能使临床医生获得更多的家庭暴力知识。然而,培训和维持家庭暴力临床倡导者模式所需的额外资源,可通过对指标、询问和披露应对技能的更复杂和更细致的理解,带来与最佳实践指南一致的明显益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信